Search results

Since you claim (w/out proving) that Trump is pro- all those things you love (sodomy, baby murder, injecting foreign substances into veins, etc.) why do you so hate his guts, @User Name? Also, since you say Trump is pro- all those things, what do you mean by calling him "MAGA"?

@User Name is a retard.

BTW, since you say that the phrase "bloodied pulp" is violent, then what about the word 'violent'? Is the word 'violent' violent?

What do you mean by that? It's not even a sentence.

Correct. Because, as I already pointed out to you, rhetoric is words, and words do not/cannot inflict bodily harm. So, rhetoric does not/cannot inflict bodily harm. Since to be violent is to inflict bodily harm, and since rhetoric does not inflict bodily harm, rhetoric is not violent. Are...

LOL @ your oxymoronic phrase, "violent rhetoric". Rhetoric isn't violent, you lying fool. Rhetoric is words. Words do not inflict bodily harm, do they? No. They do not. But the fact that you are asinine enough to claim that they do, and to misuse the adjective 'violent' the way you do...

@User Name: <NO PROOF>

Prove it.

When are you going to give until it hurts and go risk your neck to save the Ukrainians--for whose lives you leftards laughably pretend to care--from Putin's forces?

When are you going to leave for the Ukraine, to go die on the battlefield fighting against Putin?

Changed from what to what?

If Democrats were supporters of the Ukrainians whom they laughably pretend to care about, and enemies of Putin, they'd be over fighting and dying alongside the Ukrainians in the Ukraine/Russia border war.

Since you agree that that "Republican", Thomas Liddy, dismissed the fact of election fraud, why do you not condemn him for doing so? Why do you consider it good for someone to dismiss fact (something you do constantly, @User Name)?

Um, @Stripe was pointing out that Thomas Liddy, the "Republican" @annabenedetti quoted as having said "no voter was disenfranchised because of the difficulty the county experienced with some of its printers," was, in saying that, dismissing the fact of election fraud and printer tampering that...

Here, you've just pointed out how useless it is for Democrats to keep mindlessly chanting the word, "evidence", since rationally-thinking people know that Democrats have no evidence to accompany their chant.

Why do you claim to know what Meadows will say, before he has even testified? What's that? Oh, you don't know what he will say before the grand jury? Of couse you don't. Thus, you don't know that what Meadows will say will be against Donald Trump, do you, @User Name? No, you don't. But...

"Dr." "First 'Lady'" Jill. (Heck, I'm not even certain that its name is really 'Jill'.)

Why do you keep talking "RINO vs. RINO" in a thread you, yourself, started and titled:

When did Jill Biden have her hair cut sort like that? Is that a photo of Jill Biden?