Search results

Clearly @Right Divider didn't think you took his comment as a compliment. Do you really need to ask him that? Really?

That's the best emoji option I could think of for "Yikes!" So, I know it says "Wow!" but think of it as "Yikes!"

Here's a picture of Joe Biden from maybe 10-15 years back: Here's a picture they use at Breitbart, purportedly of Joe Biden: I tell y'all, I just can't see that those could be pictures of one and the same man, even taking the fact of years of aging into account. Such different eyes, noses...

Huh? LOL What (if anything) are you even trying to say? You don't even type, do you? You just ramble into a microphone and let a computer convert your raving into text as well as it can, and then paste the output right onto TOL, right?

Who was? @Avajs was? Like I said, I'm waiting to see a conversation happen between @Avajs and @Arthur Brain. Why can't that happen? And, why wouldn't @Avajs pay @Arthur Brain an actual compliment (and vice-versa)?

Do you mean you're @Avajs? Yes or No?

Good idea! Irony: the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect. OK, so the meaning of your irony is You're right, then: it would take much to raise the content. And, time and time again, even up to now...

Yep. Didn't ask. What "leaps of the imagination"? Your leaps of imagination, such as that subtle details of coincidence in literary habit (such as I documented above) are not at least suspicious, you person who has operated more than one TOL account? False. Not obviously not. Did I say it's...

I don't know that that's true, but even were it true, so what? What's your "point"? What's "backfired" on me? I'm not seeing that anything has backfired on me. Not as @Arthur Brain, no, obviously. But what's that supposed to prove? That's what you say. LOL @ you expecting me to believe it...

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/17/former-nih-director-admits-government-was-top-source-of-covid-misinformation/

But what else do Darwin cheerleaders have if they can't play their go-to "This Darwinstspeak is evidence for that Darwinistspeak!" shtick?

No bubble bursted. Wait...don't you have me on "ignore"?

Did I say you're the person who posts as @Avajs? No. I didn't. But remember, if I will think you are, obviously I don't need permission from you to think so. And, you read my posts, so you already know that the reasons I've given for my suspicion didn't even include the obvious fact of your...

There again, interestingly, your writing is peculiarly similar to a certain habit featured often in @Arthur Brain's writing. Your technically grammatically-incomplete "so..." clause is what caught my eye. Instead of "so it is a bit hard to evaluate", you cut corners by writing "so a bit hard to...

Wait...have you and I talked before? Oh, I know what it is; it's that the way you write, you sound quite a bit like @Arthur Brain. Weird. In fact, so far as I can find using TOL's search feature as best I know how, you're the first person since @Arthur Brain to have used that "sounds about...

In this thread, on 25 April 2024, @Avajs wrote: Hmmm. Where'd you hear that from, @Avajs? It's funny that the day you wrote that post (three weeks ago) happens to have been the same day The Guardian had published the article linked by @Arthur Brain (just yesterday, three weeks later) in reply...

Now, that runs along the border of the mythical, sunken land of Creditcartha, which borders the kingdom of Agartha, right? Didn't they Discover it back during the war, while going under water with debth charges, in the Chase for U-boats?

And, perhaps the most amusing thing is that Dawkins made that inadvertent attack on the professional Darwin cheerleaders' own craft by deliberately mocking and contradicting God's Word at 1 Timothy 6:10: For the love of money is the root of all evil...

https://theologyonline.com/threads/a-moronic-richard-dawkins-saying.48598/post-1716795