Search results

False. You're wrong again. Adam killed himself: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. Adam knew he would die by eating the fruit. He ate the fruit anyway, thereby killing himself. Adam...

You've already admitted that you don't even know whether or not you are obeying God. If one cannot obey God without always obeying God, then, since you don't know that you will always obey God, you don't know that you have ever obeyed God. People (such as yourself, and Calvinists) who trumpet...

@Hoping, here you are admitting that you do not know you are right. That's you admitting you don't know what you're talking about. So, why are you even talking?

False. You did state that nobody is justified by faith. Here is where you posted that statement: To state that all who are justified were justified before they believed is to state that nobody is justified by faith. Any reasonable person can read your own words in which you are making the...

We don't, I think, find your phrases, "read minds" and "read motives" in the Bible, do we? So, could you tell us exactly what you mean by them--precisely what it would be for someone to "read someone's mind/motives"?

According to your claim, no one can speak derogatorily of wrongdoers/wrongthinkers, except God. @JudgeRightly gave an example of someone who is not God speaking derogatorily of wrongdoers/wrongthinkers, showing that your claim is false: Instead of acknowledging that he proved you wrong in your...

The fact that you can answer "Yes" to that question shows that you're not going to get any rationally-thinking person to take you seriously whenever you whine that this or that thing you don't like to hear is an "insult". You're not right in the head if you really think that to call someone who...

VS Out of the one side of your mouth, you say you know certain people are deceived, whereas, out of the other side of your mouth, you say you can't know that they are deceived.

That might actually be almost mesmerizing if, instead of looping abruptly back to the beginning, it would reverse itself from the last frame all the way back to the first frame, and then play forward again to the last frame, and then back to the first frame, and so on.

Heard that before. From you.

So, according to your hypocrisy, it would be an insult for me to call you "hypocrite", but you somehow give yourself a free pass when you call people whom you consider deceived, "deceived"? You want to hear what your hypocrisy sounds like? Go call someone whom you consider deceived...

It was hard for you to figure out?

Correct: None of it was not true.😂

Oh, are you answering "Yes" to that question, @Gary K??

@Gary K: <NO ANSWER> @Gary K: <NO ANSWER> To what question is your "yes" supposed to be an answer? I don't remember having asked you any Yes/No question.

What "insult(s)" are you referring to? You'd consider calling someone who distributes poison, "poison distributor", to be a vicious thing to do? Which names do you not like, and why? Why don't you stop being a poser and start coughing up specifics?

Why is it funny to you that you cannot respond rationally to what I wrote in the post to which you have just reacted? You're going to demand I call your fallacious thinking, "logical"? You've addressed nothing from my post. And you've no hope of responding rationally to anything I have...

Oh, I doubt that. At least, one wouldn't know it by the way you sit there in silence while he airs his ravings. Why don't you start challenging the things he says, if you really think he's in error, you poser? To what, exactly, are you referring by your phrase, "ad hominem attacks"? "Get him...

From what @Rebel for truth's post-writing seems to suggest as to the complete disarray and fragility of his mind, I'd not be all too surprised if he actually thinks you were calling _him,_ rather than what he said, a "straw man"!

Were you then curious as to whether or not by the time you would reach your present age, you would still be handling English the same way you handled it then? Did "the preacher" specifically say that God said it's wrong for Cain to marry his sister?