Search results

Or your doctrine is wrong and lying isn't always a sin.

The problem at the border is politcal in nature. The law is being intentionally ignored by those who are supposed to enforce it and they are doing it for political reasons in contradiction to their oath of office. It's fix is simply the application of the law, which will not happen so long as...

Agree with what? That you're not a Christian? You know nothing about either God's word or His Spirit. You don't even have a child's understanding of what justice is! How could you possibly understand the gospel much less have accepted it as true?

I will no longer act as if you're a Christian. You have no grounds to debate against me on any Christian topic. You are not practicing the Christian religion any more than a Morman would be. If God does not exist nothing can be proven at all.

Don't ever make the mistake of thinking that it appropriate for you to correct me. You'll be invariably wrong - no matter what. I stated the sentence precisely as intended. Irrelevant. No one suggested otherwise. It doesn't even make any sense, you dullard! Fairness has exactly nothing to do...

No! That's your question begging presupposition again! It very simply is NOT a lesser evil. Telling a lie to protect the innocent is one biblical example of an act of righteousness - NOT EVIL!

Sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't.

We are going in circles. Remember the point about when the bible tells us that God does not repent and I pointed out that He doesn't repent OF EVIL and how God cannot do evil in the sense that doing so would be against His will and no one has the ability to make God act against His own will and...

We don't believe that because that isn't "the only way such could be justified". Rather than saying that 'it is never a sin to lie to someone in authority over you' we say, in agreement with the biblical material, that 'it is NOT ALWAYS a sin to lie to someone in authority over you'. Pretty...

I can live with that.

Yes. Same question as before. What does it mean to be the "epitome of absoluteness"? The point being that I doubt that you can explain it because its basically a meaningless thing to say. It is, at best, a tautology, which is why I said that "God is what He is.". False. King Sol I Samuel 13:13...

You then live under a non-existent covenant that does not adhere to justice.

No one has suggested that you should. What we are talking about is what bible believing Christians as well as anyone else who is interested in seeing justice done should advocate that the laws SHOULD BE. It does and you will. I'm telling you that your knowledge of the scriptures is on level...

You win the prize for patience, JR! You've got me beat. That's for sure!

You hope that I'm right? There isn't any question at all that I'm right and you know it. As of right now, I no longer consider you to be a Christian. You're a left wing, religious hack that wouldn't know the living God if He showed up to slap your prideful face. Your economic worldview is...

You are truly and idiot. If that's how you do doctrine, it's no wonder that you're so upside down on practically everything. That isn't at all relevant. Far fewer than have died at the hands of criminals that should have been put to death. FAR FEWER! You are literally stupid. There isn't...

Exactly. As if justice has somehow changed since the time of Moses.

Is there ANYTHING that you believe that is biblical? I'm beginning to doubt it! Luke 23:40 But the other, answering, rebuked him, saying, “Do you not even fear God, seeing you are under the same condemnation? 41 And we indeed justly, for we receive the due reward of our deeds; but this Man has...

Wow! That's one I hadn't noticed before. That's a tough one to explain, or, at least, it isn't as intuitively understood as the other examples that have been shown. What do you suppose was going on there?

That is the best post I've read on TOL in years! COMPLETELY BRILLIANT!!!! 👏👏👏👏