Search results

@Sepent1 seems to even include the Byzantine texts as "Greek translating" that "was translated out of Catholicism translating": Which makes you wonder what @Serpent1 would even use for a New Testament.

Too late. You already said they did, here: And here:

LOL You Catholics always say that sort of thing. Similarly, you were saying Catholicism gave us the Bible:

What do you even mean by that? Here's what I had written: Do you mean that what I meant is: ? It's very clear that I did not judge myself to not be a Christian, inasmuch as my words "my fellow Christians" show me judging myself to be a Christian.

You’re not even a Christian, so you're not one of my fellow Christians, you illiterate hypocrite.

Yeah, because, originally it was called "Codex Sinaiticus", and he thought that would be too hard for knotheads to be able to read, let alone type out on a keyboard. Hence, today we have the "codex sinacticus".

In other words, @Servant1 cannot be taught.

Why can't you even write a sentence? You're literally stating nothing, at all, in that post. You've got severe mental problems.

Sure it is. It's His name. It's one of His names. Your "point"? Wait... Which of those two words is His name: "YHVH" or "Jehovah"? (And, if one of them isn't His name, then why'd you write it?)

Six-digit salary, too!💰😎💰 Now behave, or I may draw on my plenary power and prerogative as moderator and put you on IGNORE!🤣

I've asked you at least twice, now: @Servant1: <STILL NO ANSWER> I've asked you at least twice, now: @Servant1: <STILL NO ANSWER> Why can't you answer these simple questions, you vicious, Christ-hating liar?

Your post was a reply to your own post. You literally just told yourself you have a thread and no clue. True and true.🤣

Oh, wait...I see you put no comma between "No" and "titles". You're merely voicing your agreement with me by an out-of-the-ordinary use of a double-negative. It is true indeed that no titles are not names/that all titles are names. Or, to put it in a way that will really resonate with you: "No...

You'll be able to prove that as soon as you're able to prove that you haven't sustained severe, permanent brain damage. You're glaringly wrong about that, though.

Titles are names. About which title(s) used in the Bible to name God are you complaining?

What you wrote, here, is why you don't want to answer the questions I asked you. If you answer that Yes, God is a worker/God works, you know how inconvenient it will be for you that you call God merely "worker" having already called Jesus "master worker".🤣

@Servant1: <NO ANSWER> @Servant1: <NO ANSWER> Answer these questions, weasel, or I'll put you on IGNORE for being a lying troll.

What's and where's "the bible well" and how do you "know" it?🤪🤠🤯😱🤡👺🐽

I asked you: You wrote: Is that a Yes or a No? Answer the question, weasel: Did Jehovah work? Yes or No? Then why did you bring up Proverbs 8:22 -- "The Lord possessed me [Wisdom] in the beginning of his way, before his works of old" -- to tell me that what is meant by the Hebrew behind...

Are you seriously trying to say that Wisdom was created? That would be you saying that God did not always have Wisdom. It would be you saying God was not always wise.