Search results

If '2,000 Mules' is your yardstick for "fact" then says it all...

Too easy...

Not in all convictions, no. If there's value in it then why would I want to do away with it?

You don't give answers on point either. You do realize that there are cases where absolute proof has been ascertained, right? That particular goal is certainly possible if absolute guilt is established before taking someone's life.

No she didn't, she lost by 17,000 votes fair and square.

Who would those be exactly?

Why on earth would I want to waste my time doing that?

How do you know? It is isn't it?

Who would those be exactly?

Of course I haven't. Strange...

You don't "speak" to people anyway TPP. You just go on long winded, silly, unsubstantiated rants. No wonder you like Trump so much...

Most Americans aren't conspiratorial wingnuts who accept the results of the 2020 election as certified. The MAGA nutjobs who stormed the capitol deserved to be jailed.

So do you if you think that remotely resembles anything I believe.

Then what's wrong with the yardstick being 100%? That way no innocent blood would be shed. Well, where it comes to what a few on here advocate as swift then execution pretty much immediately happens upon conviction.

Can hardly go back to a position I never held to start with and you just really aren't that bright are ya?

So, instead of addressing my actual position you're intent on still jumping on the coat tails of one of Stripe's silly soundbites? Heck, even he's done a flip on that whereby now I want people caged for life. Hilarious in some senses, in another it's just typical Stripe. That's some leap of...

How can I? Not so long ago you accused me of wanting to see murderers and rapists go free, remember? Learn to engage sensibly.

If God abhors the shedding of innocent blood then protocols in place to ensure that doesn't happen should be observed should't they? There's plenty cases where a swiftly enacted DP upon conviction would have resulted in the loss of innocent lives.

Funny, according to you I supposedly want rapists and murderers to be set free as per your previous posits, dopey as they were. Now I supposedly want this instead? If I now want them 'caged for life' then that's the diametric opposite of wanting them set free isn't it? You're wrong again of...

It isn't, but at least there's the chance for them to be released and compensated if evidence comes to light that proves their innocence. Can't exactly release and compensate a corpse can you?