Search results

That is, you're taking a lot of what you choose to refer to as "science" on faith. Obviously you wish to put it that way, since you did put it that way. On what "evidence" is your faith based that what you choose to call "evidence" is evidence?

What are you even talking about?

After your having said why would you ever turn around and say (thrice) ? Did you mean to ask me a question? I read all of what you posted, and you've posted absolutely nothing that is going to whitewash your glaring self-contradiction.

Huh? Which? Or better, whence? How so? OK?

I'm not thinking "jack" cares a whole lot about what the Bible has to say.

Greek? Yeah, right. More like Orc:

I'm so far not set up to post comments in TGP (or Breitbart, or other such platforms) but I scroll through them fairly frequently. So many times I've been itching to chime in, though. It's always nice to see that a few others are posting in those threads, doing what they can to refute such...

This kind of reminds me of when "old-earth" "creationists" tell me the 6 days of Creation couldn't be 24-hour periods "because" the sun wasn't created until Day 4; I always point out to them that if you cannot have 24-hour periods prior to the creation of the sun, then, all the more, you cannot...

That sounds like it could almost be a description of the idea of "plate tectonics".

"jack" also writes: They throw out pc-diktats like ''anti semitism'' or claim that 'Jesus was jewish'' which serves to derail the discussion into abstractions and steer away from the actual fact that the TaImud is the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind Which is why 8...

In the comments section at The Gateway Pundit, some Father Coughlin-wannabe called "jack" routinely performs the "Let’s join Hitler in blaming the Jews for all the evils in the world!" shtick. He gets incensed when Christians point out the Bible truth that Jesus is a Jew. He writes:Jesus could...

You're really going to continue running with that shtick, eh? -- you're trying to hand us mumbo jumbo in vain hope that it will somehow smokescreen the abject irrationality that is your thinking. Please describe for us what it would even be to "see [someone] by the works that [they do]". Give...

Ergo, you're not people?:ROFLMAO:

Oh, like how, because of your presuppositions, you call things "evidence" that aren't evidence, and you call things "not evidence" that are evidence.

That's hilarious! "Real expert" about what, exactly? Name some "real expert[s ]" you have in mind, here.

What a piece of garbage that AI is! It gets derailed if you even so much as use quotation marks around text, giving you a message basically telling you it cannot handle them. And, in the entry field, you can't even use your "Enter" key, so as to simply do a carriage return to start a new...

That's interesting. I hadn't even noticed until after I posted my previous post that it's a JW-manipulated AI; and if it is, that makes it all the more puzzling why it refuses to answer the question I asked it. Why does it refuse to take the opportunity to answer NO to my question?

Did the Apostles state that what Vincent of Lerins said or wrote is Apostolic? Yes or No? Is that a Yes or a No? Why can't the AI answer the question I asked it?

"Need evidence" for what, exactly? When you presupposed this "truth" claim of yours: -- what "evidence" led you to presuppose @Clete provided no evidence for his truth claims?