Nobody has done that, lie #1
Nobody has done that, lie #2
Nobody has done that, lie #3
Nobody has done that, lie #4
Nobody has done that, lie #5
Nobody has done that, lie #6
Nobody has done that, lie #7
Nobody has done that, lie #8
You obsess about the Holy Spirit and ignore the Christ of Christianity and His Father.
Your ninth (at least) lie in this post alone. You are a disgusting example of a false brethren. Your idea of faith is a vague abstraction without any content whatsoever. You think that you can be a Christian without fundamental Christian doctrine. You are a poser extraordinaire.
Oh yes, many have done that and theologians have criticized this reduction of divinity. Fabien Muller argues that modern theology often reduces ideas about God to immanent, social, psychological, or political categories, abandoning the older sense of divine transcendence and mystery. He critiques the cultural forces that pressure theology to renounce "speculative audacity," warning that such reductionism flattens the divine into human conceptual schemes.
https://cswr.hds.harvard.edu/news/2...ive-theology-why-theorizing-about-god-matters
Finley Lawson's analysis of
ontological reductionism warns that attempts to compress divine reality into simplified conceptual models undermine the complexity of doctrines like the Trinity and Incarnation. He argues that reductionist approaches distort the divine mystery by forcing it into overly tidy conceptual categories.
https://www.athensjournals.gr/humanities/2019-6-1-5-Lawson.pdf
Theological discourse must remain holistic, resisting the temptation to compress divine complexity into simplified formulas. Doctrines are necessary but not exhaustive; they point toward the divine but cannot contain it. Several historical theologians share this concern. Gregory of Nyssa insisted that
God is infinite and incomprehensible, and therefore cannot be contained within conceptual definitions. His apophatic emphasis warned against treating theology as a set of intellectual conclusions rather than a path of spiritual ascent.
https://philopedia.org/periods/patristic-philosophy/
Pseudo‑Dionysius argued that all doctrinal statements about God are inadequate and must be negated to preserve divine transcendence. His entire corpus is a protest against reducing God to conceptual categories.
https://philopedia.org/periods/patristic-philosophy/
Clement of Alexandria integrated Greek philosophy into Christian thought but emphasized that
true knowledge of God is ultimately experiential and moral, not merely doctrinal. He saw doctrine as a guide toward the divine life, not a substitute for it.
https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/patristic-era-foundations-medieval-thought
Augustine of Hippo repeatedly stressed that
God exceeds all human concepts. Doctrines are necessary, but they function as signs pointing beyond themselves. He warned that intellectual mastery of doctrine without love and humility leads to pride and distortion.
https://www.apuritansmind.com/histo...ical-theology-the-patristic-period-c-100-450/
