Recent content by Nick M

I was on X on my phone. Most discussions with the RCC quickly moves to "sola scriptura" because their positions are indefensible otherwise.

Paul repeats certain things in letters. He reconciled the world, including his enemies at the cross. He is not imputing trespasses. But, you are not indwelt with the Spirit until salvation. You have eternal life when he seals us into Christ.

The responses never move past "It is obvious symbolism".

Isn't really you reject all of his letters as authoritative? And claim he isn't part of the succession? It isn't a disqualifier, but if you peel the onion back you will find they also reject the gospel of grace.

That doesn't make it right.

Is there a point to your post?

Only for Israel.

I will lob grenades at anyone who perverts the gospel.

Because it is in the Federalist Papers, Declaration of Independence, or Constitution doesn't make it right. That is my point. Not to disparage him.

29 Then he called for a light, ran in, and fell down trembling before Paul and Silas. 30 And he brought them out and said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 So they said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household. Luke recorded this event regarding...

I already know what it says, as do the others here. You're probably an idiot atheist who thinks he is trolling.

This is a dual topic. 8 of the 9 Justices need to be removed for being too far to the left (of God). But that is a different area of the forum.

Never say you have heard it all. Because the internet will make us liars.

Not every answer Kirk gave was correct. Just like most of us. Neither are those taking up the slack. Tucker Carlson might be the worst choice. I appreciate that he is at least candid. He is just wrong often. Ray Comfort decided not to talk politics at Turning Point. And they agreed. He preaches...