JudgeRightly's latest activity
-
JudgeRightly reacted to Right Divider's post in the thread What did you believe before Open Theism? with
Like.
No, it does NOT! You're like a broken record BR. Again, you've not listened to a single thing that others have said. You are DEAF and... -
JudgeRightly reacted to Right Divider's post in the thread What did you believe before Open Theism? with Like.
Because we don't believe YOUR definitions about God. Instead... wait for it... we believe the BIBLE.
-
So I believe this was assassination attempt #4 at the Washington Correspondents Dinner last night.
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread What did you believe before Open Theism?.No, you have not represented me correctly. First, your sentence has a double negative, so I’m not entirely sure what you intended to...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread What did you believe before Open Theism?.The “why” has been stated repeatedly, but here it is plainly. You are treating exhaustive settled foreknowledge as though it were...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread What did you believe before Open Theism?.I’m not sure what you mean by “the God knowing Future Foreknowledge.” It sounds like you are treating your doctrine of exhaustive...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread What did you believe before Open Theism?.Yes, that article is describing the general issue, but it makes the same mistake you are making. Open Theism does not deny that God...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Honest struggles on God’s omniscience..Fulfilled Scripture is not a problem for open theism. Open theists do not deny prophecy. We do not deny that God can declare what He...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread What did you believe before Open Theism?.There are several problems with this. First, Open Theism does not deny omniscience. It denies your philosophical definition of...
-
JudgeRightly reacted to Right Divider's post in the thread Paul was NEVER under Peter's authority with Like.
I really enjoy how you completely miss the point and ignore what people write. The new covenant is a replacement for the old covenant...
-
JudgeRightly reacted to Right Divider's post in the thread Paul was NEVER under Peter's authority with Like.
A Mid-Acts dispensational view identifies Paul as the unique apostle for the current Dispensation of Grace. This perspective argues that...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Progressive Disenchantment Atonement.Several of your posts appear to be copied or closely adapted from your prewritten Progressive Disenchantment Atonement material. TOL is...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Progressive Disenchantment Atonement.He seems to be adapting his own papers/articles to this discussion. Definitely something that needs to be addressed, given our rules.
-
And any of that is relevant, how? Maybe try to actually respond rather than just copy/pasting stuff from a favorite teacher? Also, you...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Honest struggles on God’s omniscience..Okay, and? You quoted Revelation saying some people did not repent. What argument are you making from that? Open theists do not deny...