JudgeRightly's latest activity

Water baptism for a members of the body of Christ. Pros: Permissible. Cons: Completely unnecessary Causes confusion (eg.. one...

The assumption is that Paul is NOT referring to water baptism, not that he was doing so! The natural reading would be for the original...

It means that we are assuming water. That's just a statement of the commonly held position. I'd say that the "natural idea" comes from...

So, "not water" is not an argument. It's just a statement of your position. Having said that, my quoting the passages wasn't an argument...

Have you noticed that most people who identify as Christians almost always see "water" whenever they see any of the "bapt*" words? We've...

This is so incoherent that it staggers one's ability to believe that anyone could hold such a view long enough to have typed it all out...

Do any of you catholics think Mary, wife of Joseph is already resurrected? The Bible says no, I wonder what you think.

Acts 9 church origin is confirmed by Paul himself. 15 This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came...

That's because you don't really understand either.

Romans 6:3–4 Not water I Corinthians 1:13–17 Paul was glad that he baptized so few I Corinthians 10:2 Not water (i.e., the one's...

I'm out of time! Here are the passages about baptism related to or discussed by the Apostle Paul. (Compiled by AI).... Here are the...

It's not explicitly prohibited. It's just completely inappropriate and confusing. It might be the most contentious issue in the...