JudgeRightly's latest activity
-
So you're either blind, or you're a woman. Or, you're a feminist. -
An extensive tutorial on how to speak to a feminist https://www.facebook.com/share/r/188m4aR8st/...
-
No, she's not. Your choice. It was.
-
JudgeRightly reacted to Right Divider's post in the thread Paul was NEVER under Peter's authority with
Like.
I believe that you have made such a claim. It is claimed by Rome (the RCC) that Peter (and his successors), as "pope" is the sole... -
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Constitutional Monarchy.Before it gets lost... @Clete, something like this is why I'm generally against there being any means of removing a sitting king...
-
"‘Not democratic in any way’ is probably an overstatement. I'm not allergic to groups of people making certain decisions. For instance...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Paul was NEVER under Peter's authority.@Right Divider
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Paul was NEVER under Peter's authority.Did you read the chapter? Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and also took Titus with me. And I...
-
JudgeRightly reacted to Idolater's post in the thread Paul was NEVER under Peter's authority with Haha.
Post #7
-
JudgeRightly reacted to Idolater's post in the thread Paul was NEVER under Peter's authority with Haha.
My objection to the OP is post #7
-
JudgeRightly reacted to Right Divider's post in the thread When did the gospel go to the Gentiles? with Like.
Terrific post @Clete
-
-
The selection process would yield a small group of candidates (i.e. at least two, and possibly as many as five, perhaps more) from which...
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Constitutional Monarchy.No idea. But the constitution presented here: Judges of ten are appointed not by the communities, but by a higher authority.
-
JudgeRightly replied to the thread Constitutional Monarchy.Lotteries are a thing, you know. A la Acts 1:21-26...