Then why are you participating in this thread?
Because you're saying things about scripture that are false. I don't just state that they are false though, I make the argument. Theology isn't about personal opinions. At least that's true the vast majority of the time. Most Christian have no concept at all of building their doctrine, whether eschatology or any other aspect of their theology, from first principles. They just play. They effectively treat God's word like it's their own personal theological Lego set. They cram various bricks together, some more mindlessly than others, and then try to pass it off as something brilliant.
In short, your doctrine is false because you ignore nearly every objective aspect of the passages you are interpreting. You ignore who is speaking, you ignore who that person is speaking to, you are willing to even ignore the normal definitions or common words if need be. When those things aren't ignored and instead are treated as the objective biblical facts that they are, your doctrine crumbles to dust without even needing to make any further argument. Just the intuitive implications alone are sufficient to pulverize nearly everything you believe.
That's the power of first principles. The more foundation the issue the more impactful an error related to that issue will be. That's how Calvinism, for example, disintegrates by simply refuting the singular unbiblical doctrine of immutability. The error you're making with your eschatology isn't quite so foundational as that, but it's plenty foundational enough. The issue of rightly dividing the word of truth is the fork in the road where you're eschatology made a dramatically important wrong turn. Everything after that was significantly off course and moving in the wrong direction.
