End of Roe Vs Wade?

[ok doser]

 

[Gary K]

View attachment 3257

That looks like a mob out to burn witches.

 

[Rusha]

Does it bother anyone that having already made the decision, the SC then chose to keep it a secret until just before they break? Why be so cowardly and under-handed about it? It's the kind of thing we've come to expect politicians to do, not judges.

Quite simple. Several of the *judges* misrepresented themselves while auditioning for their role on the SC. Secondly, the decision was made with wrong motivation. The only acceptable excuse for limiting other people’s rights is to save lives and protect the innocent who are incapable of defending themselves. The GOP’s motivation is to power boost the role of men. Which is exactly why they will be going after contraception next.

Zealots don’t care one iota about the family AFTER the child is born.

 

[ok doser]

Quite simple. Several of the *judges* misrepresented themselves while auditioning for their role on the SC.

yes this is the lie that's currently being pushed by the people you rely upon to tell you what to think

Secondly, the decision was made with wrong motivation.

You presume to know the motivation of the five justices who are apparently going to vote to overturn Roe v Wade?

The only acceptable excuse for limiting other people’s rights is to save lives and protect the innocent.

Like babies

I thought you used to pretend that you were against abortion here

The GOP’s motivation is to power boost the role of men.

Oh of course. The well-known misandry of rusha

Which is exactly why they will be going after contraception next.

Who will?

The Supreme Court?

Dude - put down the crack pipe and step away

Zealots

That's you sweetie

don’t care about the family AFTER the child is born.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Zealots don’t care one iota about the family AFTER the child is born.

This is a lie.

 

[PureX]

Quite simple. Several of the *judges* misrepresented themselves while auditioning for their role on the SC. Secondly, the decision was made with wrong motivation. The only acceptable excuse for limiting other people’s rights is to save lives and protect the innocent who are incapable of defending themselves. The GOP’s motivation is to power boost the role of men. Which is exactly why they will be going after contraception next.

Zealots don’t care one iota about the family AFTER the child is born.

I predict it'll be the gays, next.

 

[ok doser]

This is a lie.

rusha and the bananahead and the other leftists here who have for years pretended to be against abortion are severely conflicted now, now that Roe v Wade, which they never thought would be overturned, is set to be overturned.

More and more you will see the scales slipping from their masks and their true nature is being revealed.

 

[Rusha]

I predict it'll be the gays, next.

Yep.

 

[ok doser]

I predict it'll be the gays, next.

I predict it will be the government's claim to the power to influence the decisions of private individuals including owners of private businesses. And yes this will affect homosexuals and other perverts.

 

[Rusha]

This is a lie.

IF the intent were for the mother, baby and children to flourish, the GOP and their followers would support free or affordable healthcare (including prenatal) and childcare, pre-k, a livable wage, Free contraception, free tubalsand vasectomies. They would treat deadbeat parents as criminals and lock them away until they financially contribute OR forever sign away their parental rights.

 

[Derf]

God did not pardon Jerusalem so what is the only conclusion to be drawn? There were no honest people there for only honest people seek the truth.

It certainly appears that way.

 

[Derf]

IF the intent were for the mother, baby and children to flourish, the GOP and their followers would support free or affordable healthcare (including prenatal) and childcare, pre-k, a livable wage, Free contraception, free tubalsand vasectomies. They would treat deadbeat parents as criminals and lock them away until they financially contribute OR forever sign away their parental rights.

False dichotomy. Like: If God didn't intend for people to steal, He would have told us to give the thieves everything they wanted.

 

[JudgeRightly]

IF the intent were for the mother, baby and children to flourish...

... then the goal should be to keep parents together, where the father provides and cares for both mother and child.

the GOP and their followers would support free or affordable healthcare (including prenatal) and childcare, pre-k, a livable wage, Free contraception, free tubalsand vasectomies.

Only if they hated men, women, and their children.

The government should have ZERO part in providing for families. That responsibility belongs to the father. Having the government provide those things lessens the need for the father to stick around.

They would treat deadbeat parents as criminals and lock them away until they financially contribute OR forever sign away their parental rights.

Putting people in cages is inhumane. We (should) put animals in cages, not humans.

 

[Derf]

Quite simple. Several of the *judges* misrepresented themselves while auditioning for their role on the SC. Secondly, the decision was made with wrong motivation. The only acceptable excuse for limiting other people’s rights is to save lives and protect the innocent who are incapable of defending themselves. The GOP’s motivation is to power boost the role of men. Which is exactly why they will be going after contraception next.

Zealots don’t care one iota about the family AFTER the child is born.

I thought liberals didn't like the slippery slope argument.

 

[ok doser]

IF the intent were for the mother, baby and children to flourish

The first step is not to murder the child

, the GOP and their followers would support free or affordable healthcare (including prenatal) and childcare, pre-k, a livable wage, Free contraception, free tubalsand vasectomies.

Again this is the talking point that's being pushed by the people you count on to tell you what to think. Intelligent people can pick it apart and examine it and understand that it's all crap. Stupid people like you find it persuasive.

They would treat deadbeat parents as criminals and lock them away until they financially contribute OR forever sign away their parental rights.

you understand that this sort of a policy would disproportionately fall on African Americans, right? But you're okay with that because you're a racist. You're a racist, you're a misandrist, and you support abortion on demand

 

[ok doser]

I thought liberals didn't like the slippery slope argument.

If not for double standards leftists would have no standards at all

 

[Rusha]

I predict it'll be the gays, next.

Of course it will be. Women. Gays. Blacks. Religious freedom. And for anti-vaxxers … children.

 

[Rusha]

Putting people in cages is inhumane. We (should) put animals in cages, not humans.

Deadbeat parents who go out of their way to dodge child support need to have their parental rights revoked or rot in a jail cell.

 

[ok doser]

Of course it will be. Women. Gays. Blacks. Religious freedom. And for anti-vaxxers … children.

Praying that God releases you from the grip of the demons that control your thinking

 

[JudgeRightly]

Deadbeat parents

Should not be given the excuse that the government will provide for their family if they abandon them.

who go out of their way to dodge child support

"Child support" should mean "Parents providing and caring for their children." That's the best child support a child can get.

need to have their parental rights revoked

God said "Be fruitful and multiply." He never gave the condition that it should only be for those who pay child support.

You oppose God when you promote this idea.

or rot in a jail cell.

Again, caging up humans is, by definition, inhumane. Animals go in cages, not humans.