Yet you support democrats who are way more likely to take your guns away from you than republicans.I'm also a gun owner and truck owner, as is almost every family in my large extended family.
Yet you support democrats who are way more likely to take your guns away from you than republicans.I'm also a gun owner and truck owner, as is almost every family in my large extended family.
And replace her truck with something that runs on a battery.Yet you support democrats who are way more likely to take your guns away from you than republicans.
And make sure her family does not have another large family by cramming abortion, transgenderism and condoms into the young ones' headsAnd replace her truck with something that runs on a battery.
Yet you support democrats who are way more likely to take your guns away from you than republicans.
Obama backed away from the gun issue after he and Eric Holder got caught sending fast and furious automatic weapons to drug dealers in Mexico which resulted in the deaths of two American law enforcement officers.You mean like Obama was supposed to?
Obama backed away from the gun issue after he and Eric Holder got caught sending fast and furious automatic weapons to drug dealers in Mexico which resulted in the deaths of two American law enforcement officers.
Obama is smarter than Biden and others in his godless party. He knows real Americans will never allow their government to confiscate their guns no matter how many fake ballots and corrupted polls they present to push behind their unAmerican gun-grabbing nonsense.Gunwalking started during the Bush administration. Not a great idea, but certainly not why Obama didn't come take all yer guns in the 8 years he was president.
Works for meMarge agrees with conservatives who dream of taking voting rights away from their opposing party constituents.
Well....I suppose that that would be much more civilized than burning the scumbags out within a week of arrival, and sending them packing back to the stew-bum infested liberal hellholes that they voted for themselves.Marge agrees with conservatives who dream of taking voting rights away from their opposing party constituents.
Talking about setting the bar low we have Biden who hid during the campaign, is brain dead, killed America’s economy, threw open the southern border, and donated billions of dollars worth of military equipment to terrorist in Afghanistan . Now that is setting the bar low. Then we have obtuse demon rat’s who advocated for defunding the police now throwing 1.68 billion to police departments, which of course will end up in mismanaged blue states and cities.Because the bar is that low. So Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert...
My first choice was barring them entryWell....I suppose that that would be much more civilized than burning the scumbags out within a week of arrival, and sending them packing back to the stew-bum infested liberal hellholes that they voted for themselves.
But I don't suppose that it would be constitutional.
Requiring proof of legitimacy does not take any legitimate voter's rights away in spite of leftists' claims to the contrary for the purpose of protecting voter fraud.Marge agrees with conservatives who dream of taking voting rights away from their opposing party constituents.
So, if one state accepted student ids and another state did not bit accepted military ids, would different groups of voters have equal ease of meeting the requirement?Requiring proof of legitimacy does not take any legitimate voter's rights away in spite of leftists claims to the contrary for the purpose of protecting voter fraud.
I was at my State's DMV a couple days ago ( NY), and there was a sign on the window that said for certain transactions you needed six degrees of identification, or an enhanced driver's license (which I had). In my experience this is no different from using the services of a public notary or getting a car loan.So, if one state accepted student ids and another state did not bit accepted military ids, would different groups of voters have equal ease of meeting the requirement?
Inexperienced children who don't understand why the following post is a sign of retardation. Inexperienced children who will squabble over it all day long. Inexperienced children who confirm my belief that social media is for retards.I was at my State's DMV a couple days ago ( NY), and there was a sign on the window that said for certain transactions you needed six degrees of identification, or an enhanced driver's license (which I had). In my experience this is no different from using the services of a public notary or getting a car loan.
I suspect that most of the whining that I see on the left from people saying that requiring identification is discriminatory, most of the whining is coming from children - inexperienced children who don't understand the adult world.
Unfortunately, many of these children are in their twenties and thirties.
I suspect that most of the whining that I see on the left from people saying that requiring identification is discriminatory, most of the whining is coming from children - inexperienced children who don't understand the adult world.
Unfortunately, many of these children are in their twenties and thirties.
I'm still wondering how Barry Sotero got into HarvardI'm wondering how did they get the student ID without valid forms of ID?..Like a Military ID or State Issued ID?
But, wait a moment...I thought this type of suppressing rights was the remit of the "left"?!Marge agrees with conservatives who dream of taking voting rights away from their opposing party constituents.