Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What if God needed Adam to fall early on?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Derf
    replied
    Originally posted by Truster View Post
    You accepted Christ? By this of course it is evident that if you hadn't then Messiah was powerless to save. Your concept of the power of the evangelism is warped.
    You haven't? Would you like to know about how you can be saved?

    Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved. You don't even have to wait for someone to tell you you've been regenerated (or not)!

    Whereas from what I'm hearing from you, your evangelism says--don't bother believing, because if you believe without regeneration, your belief isn't effective. And belief with regeneration is an unknown process by which you really don't know if it has happened or not--you just assume it has to you and assume it hasn't to everyone you don't agree with.

    Be careful: you might be one of those individuals who THINKS they are saved, only to fall away at the end of your life, because God really doesn't love you enough to want you to live forever.

    Whose concept of evangelism is warped?

    [1Co 15:1-4 KJV] 1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:


    But still...what does this have to do with the topic. If we can only have meaningful conversations if you, the keeper of the keys of heaven apparently, allow me to be considered regenerate, then I appreciate the time you've wasted on me so far, and I hope you enjoy the meaningless content in this forum.

    If, however, there's a possibility that some of our conversation might still be somewhat intelligible, I urge you to continue with me in it. It's up to you (or up to God who ordained this conversation to be perfectly meaningless from all eternity, but also ordained that you be stuck in it, perhaps).

    Leave a comment:


  • Truster
    replied
    You accepted Christ? By this of course it is evident that if you hadn't then Messiah was powerless to save. Your concept of the power of the evangelism is warped.

    Leave a comment:


  • Derf
    replied
    Originally posted by Truster View Post
    You wander in the dark pretending you can see. I'll not be giving that which is holy...
    To dogs? I'm asking you questions about your faith. Are you not willing to give an answer for the hope that lies within you? Or not able to?

    And you have to think for just a second. If the faith of a Christian is only understood by the regenerate, then you have to wonder if YOU really understand it, don't you think?? And maybe you're not a Christian, but only think you are, because maybe you're not really regenerated.

    If that doesn't hit you like a ton of bricks, put yourself in my supposed shoes for just a minute. I accepted Christ when I was young, believing that His blood was powerful enough to save me from death and hell. I continue to believe in Him today. Yet I've been deceived all these years and continue to be deceived today, because there's some kind of secret initiation that God gives to those He deems worthy.

    Secret initiations are tough on everyone, because even if you think you're in the know, maybe you're not--maybe you just THINK you understand, but only the next level up of understanding is good enough to get into the secret club.

    Please consider that maybe, just maybe, God really wants people to know about Him and believe in Him, and He provided the "good news" to us in such a way that we don't have to be a member of a special club to receive and process and understand and accept the "good news". If not, then the good news is only good for those people who don't need it. Like you, I suppose. For the rest of us, who aren't allowed in, it's pretty bad news, I'm afraid. News fit for dogs, yes???

    Leave a comment:


  • Truster
    replied
    Originally posted by Derf View Post
    Ok, then if regeneration and repentance are simultaneous, does belief precede or follow? It sounds like the mind must be renewed first, before one can believe, correct? Isn't repentance the same? If we truly repent, we must have a change of minds about God and His commands. Thus it seems like you are really saying that repentance AND belief must FOLLOW regeneration, despite your words?

    But Paul seems to think otherwise. In Rom 12:1-2, he says to "Brothers" (which must mean fellow believers, yes?), that they need to be transformed by the renewing of their minds. Thus, the renewing has not happened yet, but they are already brothers. "...but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to discern ..."


    You have to experience eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil to understand it? I guess that makes sense, but seems like a no-brainer--what's your point about it?
    You wander in the dark pretending you can see. I'll not be giving that which is holy...

    Leave a comment:


  • Derf
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
    To what "death" are you making reference?
    Let's just say, for discussion's sake, the death that Christ came to reverse/defeat with His death on the cross.

    Leave a comment:


  • Derf
    replied
    Originally posted by Truster View Post
    Regeneration and repentance are simultaneous. Both are graces that renew the mind/intellect.
    Ok, then if regeneration and repentance are simultaneous, does belief precede or follow? It sounds like the mind must be renewed first, before one can believe, correct? Isn't repentance the same? If we truly repent, we must have a change of minds about God and His commands. Thus it seems like you are really saying that repentance AND belief must FOLLOW regeneration, despite your words?

    But Paul seems to think otherwise. In Rom 12:1-2, he says to "Brothers" (which must mean fellow believers, yes?), that they need to be transformed by the renewing of their minds. Thus, the renewing has not happened yet, but they are already brothers. "...but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to discern ..."

    It has to be experienced to be understood. "Understanding", that is of the mind as well.?
    You have to experience eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil to understand it? I guess that makes sense, but seems like a no-brainer--what's your point about it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry Shugart
    replied
    Originally posted by Derf View Post
    But then what? God's ONLY begotten son was already slated to redeem Adam's children, who were condemned to death because of Adam's sin.
    To what "death" are you making reference?

    Leave a comment:


  • Truster
    replied
    Originally posted by Derf View Post
    I thought you said regeneration was the key to understanding. Now you are saying repentance is the key that brings clarity. Which is it?

    Sent from my Z992 using TheologyOnline mobile app
    Regeneration and repentance are simultaneous. Both are graces that renew the mind/intellect.It has to be experienced to be understood. "Understanding", that is of the mind as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Derf
    replied
    Originally posted by Truster View Post
    A belief in the historical existence of Messiah and the doctrine of salvation is not salvation. Even if you should shout it from the roof tops every day, it is not salvation. Regeneration or the new birth is the start of salvation and without the experience of being taken out of darkness into light, from death to life and the clarity that repentance provides a man has a form of religion, but denies the power of the evangelism.
    I thought you said regeneration was the key to understanding. Now you are saying repentance is the key that brings clarity. Which is it?

    Sent from my Z992 using TheologyOnline mobile app
    Last edited by Derf; March 5, 2017, 07:23 PM. Reason: Clarity

    Leave a comment:


  • Truster
    replied
    Originally posted by Derf View Post
    So you are asserting that I don't understand what you're saying because I'm not regenerated.

    Let's pretend that's true for just a minute. That means that my belief in Jesus Christ as the only Son of God and the only hope of salvation, who died for my sins and rose again to demonstrate what waits for us who believe, i.e. resurrection from the dead, is a false gospel. Because something else needs to happen apart from belief in Christ for me to be regenerated.

    Is that truly what you are saying?

    Not only that, but such a response is a cop out--it removes from you the responsibility of giving an answer for the hope that lies within you. Only the regenerate will understand the important stuff anyway--and they already know it--so there's no need to explain anything important. Kind of makes me wonder why you would respond to anything in one of these forums--those who understand won't need to hear your response, and everybody else CAN'T understand your response.

    Kind of makes all Christianity seem like an exercise of preaching to the choir, don't you think? But Jesus came into the world to save SINNERS, not the regenerate--they don't need saving.
    A belief in the historical existence of Messiah and the doctrine of salvation is not salvation. Even if you should shout it from the roof tops every day, it is not salvation. Regeneration or the new birth is the start of salvation and without the experience of being taken out of darkness into light, from death to life and the clarity that repentance provides a man has a form of religion, but denies the power of the evangelism.

    Leave a comment:


  • Derf
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
    Yes, but not until they sin.
    But then what? God's ONLY begotten son was already slated to redeem Adam's children, who were condemned to death because of Adam's sin.

    Sent from my Z992 using TheologyOnline mobile app

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry Shugart
    replied
    Originally posted by Derf View Post
    But, if there's a possibility of sin for those that were born to Adam before he sinned, then Jesus' death becomes a necessity for them, but maybe it doesn't apply to them in the same way.
    Yes, but not until they sin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Derf
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
    Yes, I agree. So I do not think that it was necessary "that all of the people on the whole earth would be covered by Jesus' sacrifice," as you said earlier.
    But, if there's a possibility of sin for those that were born to Adam before he sinned, then Jesus' death becomes a necessity for them, but maybe it doesn't apply to them in the same way.

    Sent from my Z992 using TheologyOnline mobile app

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry Shugart
    replied
    Originally posted by Derf View Post
    I don't see the point of Christ's sacrifice for a sinless man that was not going to die. Christ died to save the ungodly....from death.
    Yes, I agree. So I do not think that it was necessary "that all of the people on the whole earth would be covered by Jesus' sacrifice," as you said earlier.

    Leave a comment:


  • Derf
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
    If Adam would have remained in a state of innocence and therefore remained sinless then he could have continued to eat of the Tree of Life and live for ever.

    Then what need would he have had for the Lord Jesus dying on the cross? Was Christ's sacrifice for men's sins not necessary until a man became guilty of sinning?

    What do you think?
    I don't see the point of Christ's sacrifice for a sinless man that was not going to die. Christ died to save the ungodly....from death.

    Sent from my Z992 using TheologyOnline mobile app

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X