Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HANDLE THIS ??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Theology Club: HANDLE THIS ??

    Hi to all and since MID-ACTS is all man made , have anyone considered this THEORY ?

    #1 . In Gal 1:15 Paul was saved !

    #2 , Saved from his mother's WOMB !

    #3 , This means , that Gal 1:15 Paul was saved by GRACE !

    #4 , This also means that Paul was saved in his mother's WOMB 2 years after Jesus BIRTH !!

    #5 , So , does this mean that the Body of Christ began in Gal 1:15 ?

    #6 , Or maybe in Matthew ??

    MID-ACTS was man-made so that Acts 2 , 9 , 11 , 13 and 28 could worship together in the 1940's !!


    #7 , What I written I believe to be true , BUT since I am a strict Acts 9:6 I can destroy this position with one verse !!

    dan p
    Last edited by DAN P; January 12th, 2016, 03:23 PM.

  • #2
    MID-ACTS was man-made so that Actys 2 , 9 , 11 , 13 and 28 could worship together in the 1940's !!
    How'd that work out?
    "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
    Terence Mc Lean

    [most will be very surprised]


    Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
    By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by musterion View Post
      How'd that work out?

      Hi and have you seen anyone prove a MID-ACTS position with a verse ??

      I have not and we have that position in our by-laws and to me that is dis-honest and do not have the guts or know why it in rhere and I have stood up and opposed it in our assembly and and it was voted down , but the Elder board has brought up again in 2016 !!

      dan p

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DAN P View Post
        Hi and have you seen anyone prove a MID-ACTS position with a verse ??
        Not that I recall, anymore than anyone ever proved the Jew/Gentile Body of Christ began at Pentecost.
        "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
        Terence Mc Lean

        [most will be very surprised]


        Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
        By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by musterion View Post
          Not that I recall, anymore than anyone ever proved the Jew/Gentile Body of Christ began at Pentecost.

          Hi and many Grace assemblies have this in there Constitution " that we are a MID-ACTS Assembly clearly and Planily " and are dis-honest to say we are Acts 9 !!

          dan p

          Comment


          • #6
            So what you're saying is (correct me if I'm wrong), don't say "we're Acts chapter __," just say "Mid-Acts" instead?
            "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
            Terence Mc Lean

            [most will be very surprised]


            Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
            By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DAN P View Post
              Hi to all and since MID-ACTS is all man made , have anyone considered this THEORY ?

              #1 . In Gal 1:15 Paul was saved !

              #2 , Saved from his motehr's WOMB !

              #3 , This means , that Gal 1:15 Paul was saved by GRACE !

              #4 , This also means that Paul was saved in his mother's WOMB 2 years after Jesus BIRTH !!

              #5 , So , does this mean that the Body of Christ began in Gal 1:15 ?

              #6 , Or maybe in Matthew ??

              MID-ACTS was man-made so that Actys 2 , 9 , 11 , 13 and 28 could worship together in the 1940's !!


              #7 , What I written I believe to be true , BUT since I am a strict Acts 9:6 I can destroy this position with one verse !!

              dan p
              Acts 2 is the birth of the churchie

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by musterion View Post
                So what you're saying is (correct me if I'm wrong), don't say "we're Acts chapter __," just say "Mid-Acts" instead?
                Yeah, if you wanna get DP's goat, that is lol

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by intojoy View Post
                  Acts 2 is the birth of the churchie

                  Hi and now show how PENTECOAT a Jewish Feast Day is connected to the BODY of CHRIST !!

                  dan p
                  Last edited by DAN P; January 12th, 2016, 12:15 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by musterion View Post
                    So what you're saying is (correct me if I'm wrong), don't say "we're Acts chapter __," just say "Mid-Acts" instead?

                    Hi and as far as I know I am the only one saying that Mid-Acts is man made an I am A STRICT Acts 9:6 .

                    One Mid-Acts proponent said that Mid-Acts is to get as many under a dispensational umbrella !!

                    All I am doing is letting all know that Mid-Acts is man made and not scriptural whatsoever , so BELIEVE it OR NOT !!

                    DAN P

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by intojoy View Post
                      Acts 2 is the birth of the churchie
                      Hi and you are still alive , so there is still HOPE for all , before the BEMA SEAT , don't you see !!

                      If you really are Acts 2 , where do you take sacrifice , ask Danoh , maybe he can help you !!

                      dan p

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                        Yeah, if you wanna get DP's goat, that is lol

                        Hi and are Goats easier to care for than Donkeys ??

                        Are you ready to embrace Mid-Gal OR maybe Mid-Matt ??

                        dan p

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DAN P View Post
                          Hi and as far as I know I am the only one saying that Mid-Acts is man made an I am A STRICT Acts 9:6 .

                          One Mid-Acts proponent said that Mid-Acts is to get as many under a dispensational umbrella !!

                          All I am doing is letting all know that Mid-Acts is man made and not scriptural whatsoever , so BELIEVE it OR NOT !!

                          DAN P
                          Who said that? Pretty much all who hear of MAD hate it.
                          "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
                          Terence Mc Lean

                          [most will be very surprised]


                          Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
                          By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by musterion View Post
                            Who said that? Pretty much all who hear of MAD hate it.

                            Hi one higher up in the Grace Movement !! Sorry , as I am always in trouble !!

                            Most say it bagan with Paul when Paul wrote his first epistle !!

                            What epistle was that ?

                            dan p

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by musterion View Post
                              Who said that? Pretty much all who hear of MAD hate it.
                              This notion of DP's "Mid-Acts is to get as many under a dispensational umbrella !!"

                              I once heard Richard Jordan say something along that line - along that line that is, when his words are misunderstood, whether intentionally, or out of plain old sloppiness in one's careful observation of details.

                              His words were more along the line of how that the Mid-Acts label was the result of an attempt between Acts 9 and Acts 13 leaders to allow each their respective differences in understanding, out of their collective agreement that each individual was where he was in his particular understanding given each's time, talents, etc., in the Word.

                              It was an attempt between those who were neither Acts 2 nor 28 to allow their different understanding, Acts 9, or 13, or what have you, seeing as it did not compromise all they held in common.

                              And they were ever willing to explore their different understandings as to what began where, etc. Each did not need the other to agree with them on the minors, or else.

                              Many of them are still agreeable.

                              Thus, why one still hears or reads of the label, Mid-Acts.

                              And then you have the legalists and their “my way or the highway.”

                              They talk Paul this, Grace that, and “that’s not for us,” til the cows come home.

                              Attempt to voice difference in your understanding; see how much Grace they truly understand, let alone, practice.

                              There is no exploring anything with such. They only project their own agenda into it, catch said projection’s reflection shining back at them, and only conclude it’s actually the other side that is up to no good.

                              Paul himself was often the target of such hypocrisy from his own.

                              Given this dynamic between the two, the best thing to do is to leave such to their dissimulation.

                              Not mad, just MAD

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X