Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

both in one Body by the cross

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
    Oooh, oooh, I know!

    For the sake of the Jew...as Paul was still gathering a remnant during Acts.
    Nope; Paul was dealing with Jews concluded spiritual UNcircumcision, Romans 1-3.

    Jews are that to this very day.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by heir View Post
      You did not answer the questions.

      Why were certain Gentiles to whom Paul was sent under the handwriting of ordinances? Are we? Why or why not?
      Define "ordinances" - in their various senses throughout the KJV, including the Apostle Paul's various uses of that word.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Danoh View Post
        Define "ordinances" - in their various senses throughout the KJV, including the Apostle Paul's various uses of that word.
        http://theologyonline.com/showthread...=1#post4669075
        2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

        Paul defines the word of truth as the gospel of your salvation (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, Ephesians 1:13 KJV). Now, study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed by rightly dividing it!

        Comment


        • All you are doing is proof texting your view - and poorly.

          Unless it is now okay to ignore two of those and go and fornicate and go and worship with the Roman Catholics and their idols

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Danoh View Post
            Nope; Paul was dealing with Jews concluded spiritual UNcircumcision, Romans 1-3.
            Of course.
            But they were not yet cast away, and he did not want blood drinking Diana worshiping Gentiles offending them during Acts.
            Originally posted by Interplanner
            They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
            Originally posted by Interplanner
            You're too literal to get it.
            Originally posted by Interplanner
            The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
              Of course.
              But they were not yet cast away, and he did not want blood drinking Diana worshiping Gentiles offending them during Acts.
              Nope; their casting away took place in Acts 7. Paul himself was from that point forward spiritual UNcircumcision, Matt. 12; 1 Tim. 1.

              Romans 11:11 I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy. 11:12 Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?

              Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: 11:14 If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them. 11:15 For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?

              They'd been cast away; no longer "not my people...for a season."

              He was hoping he might provoke some of them to jelousy that he might save some via his UNcircumcision ministry - which was all they now had access to - for there was now "no difference" as to Jew and Gentile - both were now "under sin" Rom. 1-3.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                Nope; their casting away took place in Acts 7.


                No way.
                Originally posted by Interplanner
                They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                Originally posted by Interplanner
                You're too literal to get it.
                Originally posted by Interplanner
                The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post


                  No way.
                  Romans 11:15 For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                    Romans 11:15 For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?
                    Romans 1
                    11 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

                    2 God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel saying,

                    3 Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.

                    4 But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal.

                    5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.



                    There was a still at remnant at the time Paul wrote Romans, probably Acts 20.
                    And the Jew still had an advantage.



                    Romans 11:15 (KJV) looks ahead to the end of Acts and the mystery of the gospel that heir and I are trying to get you to see.
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    You're too literal to get it.
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                      Romans 1
                      11 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

                      2 God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel saying,

                      3 Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.

                      4 But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal.

                      5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.



                      There was a still at remnant at the time Paul wrote Romans, probably Acts 20.
                      And the Jew still had an advantage.



                      Romans 11:15 (KJV) looks ahead to the end of Acts and the mystery of the gospel that heir and I are trying to get you to see.
                      You are proof texting that.

                      Said remant was a reference to those who had believed and were sealed before God concluded the rest in unbelief.

                      Romans 11:5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace. 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. 11:7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                        You are proof texting that.
                        So you say, Tet...
                        Originally posted by Interplanner
                        They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                        Originally posted by Interplanner
                        You're too literal to get it.
                        Originally posted by Interplanner
                        The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                          So you say, Tet...
                          Don't tell me you want to go there, STP; not when you would come off as better than that.

                          I think I'll just leave you to that; if that is where you want to go.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                            Don't tell me you want to go there, STP; not when you would come off as better than that.

                            I think I'll just leave you to that; if that is where you want to go.


                            You rib me and heir hundreds of times over the past six months...I say nothing.

                            I rib you once and you take offence.
                            Originally posted by Interplanner
                            They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                            Originally posted by Interplanner
                            You're too literal to get it.
                            Originally posted by Interplanner
                            The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post


                              You rib me and heir hundreds of times over the past six months...I say nothing.

                              I rib you once and you take offence.
                              You're sure that is what I took; aren't you

                              Ok, mr distinctions

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                                All you are doing is proof texting your view - and poorly.

                                Unless it is now okay to ignore two of those and go and fornicate and go and worship with the Roman Catholics and their idols
                                There were Gentiles under these ordinances.

                                20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.

                                Why were certain Gentiles to whom Paul was sent under them? Are we? Why or why not?
                                2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

                                Paul defines the word of truth as the gospel of your salvation (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, Ephesians 1:13 KJV). Now, study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed by rightly dividing it!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X