Announcement

Collapse

Creation Science Rules

This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective.
Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed.
1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team
2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
See more
See less

Evolution and its effects.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
    What argument?

    We're stuck in a semantic rut. It's really boring, but the Darwinists seem to love it.

    That would be fine, as long as you respect what I believe.

    You've yet to explain what is wrong with my definition of evolution, or whether you hold to it.
    Stripe, the idea "that all life is descended from a universal common ancestor by means of random mutations and natural selection." may be a consequence of evolution, but it is not the theory of evolution itself, nor is it the observed facts.

    Why is it so hard for you to accept the dictionary definition, or Barb's definition?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by chair View Post
      Stripe, the idea "that all life is descended from a universal common ancestor by means of random mutations and natural selection." may be a consequence of evolution, but it is not the theory of evolution itself, nor is it the observed facts.
      I'm not arguing with facts. I deny the theory of evolution.

      Why is it so hard for you to accept the dictionary definition, or Barb's definition?
      It's been explained to you a thousand times.
      Where is the evidence for a global flood?
      E≈mc2
      "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

      "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
      -Bob B.

      Comment


      • Barbie's definition changes with the wind

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
          I'm not arguing with facts. I deny the theory of evolution.

          It's been explained to you a thousand times.
          A dictionary definition ought to be acceptable to all sides. You have not explained why you don't accept it. You prefer to argue with the image of evolution in your mind, rather than what it really is.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by chair View Post
            A dictionary definition ought to be acceptable to all sides. You have not explained why you don't accept it. You prefer to argue with the image of evolution in your mind, rather than what it really is.
            Chair - I'll respond to you this evening when I'm in front of my laptop

            Comment


            • Originally posted by chair View Post
              Stripe, the idea "that all life is descended from a universal common ancestor by means of random mutations and natural selection." may be a consequence of evolution, but it is not the theory of evolution itself, nor is it the observed facts.

              Why is it so hard for you to accept the dictionary definition, or Barb's definition?
              Because the less obfuscation, the less believable the YE creationist belief becomes.
              This message is hidden because ...

              Comment


              • Originally posted by chair View Post
                A dictionary definition ought to be acceptable to all sides.

                Evolution: The scientific theory explaining the appearance of new species and varieties through the action of various biological mechanisms such as natural selection [and random mutations].



                You have not explained why you don't accept it.
                Of course I have.

                You prefer to argue with the image of evolution in your mind, rather than what it really is.
                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                E≈mc2
                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                -Bob B.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                  I'm not arguing with facts. I deny the theory of evolution.
                  So you admit that evolution occurs, just the mechanism that the theory suggests bothers you?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by chair View Post
                    So you admit that evolution occurs.
                    Nope.

                    Just the mechanism that the theory suggests bothers you?
                    The theory needs to outline the mechanism.

                    Why do Darwinists struggle so with simple concepts?
                    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                    E≈mc2
                    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                    -Bob B.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                      Nope.
                      Odd. You said that you don't deny the facts. And then you go ahead and deny them. Weird.

                      Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                      The theory needs to outline the mechanism.
                      And so it does.
                      Originally posted by Stripe View Post

                      Why do Darwinists struggle so with simple concepts?
                      Someone is struggling with basic concepts here, and it isn't me. Nor am I a "Darwanist". You aren't stupid or nasty by nature, but on this forum you behave both stupidly and nastily. Perhaps that is your way of demonstrating good Christian behavior.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by chair View Post
                        Odd. You said that you don't deny the facts. And then you go ahead and deny them. Weird.
                        Evolution isn't a fact. It's just a theory.

                        And so it does.
                        Then it's not a fact. It's just a theory.

                        Someone is struggling with basic concepts here, and it isn't me. You aren't stupid or nasty by nature, but on this forum you behave both stupidly and nastily. Perhaps that is your Darwinism.
                        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                        E≈mc2
                        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                        -Bob B.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                          Evolution isn't a fact. It's just a theory.

                          Then it's not a fact. It's just a theory.

                          Someone is struggling with basic concepts here, and it isn't me. You aren't stupid or nasty by nature, but on this forum you behave both stupidly and nastily. Perhaps that is your Darwinism.
                          "know where to go"

                          Comment


                          • Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                            E≈mc2
                            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                            -Bob B.

                            Comment


                            • Arguing with some folks about science is like arguing with Donald Trump about ethics.

                              They don't know anything about the subject, and don't even believe such a thing exists.
                              This message is hidden because ...

                              Comment


                              • Arguing with some folks about science is like arguing with Barbarian.

                                They don't know anything about the subject, and don't want to learn.
                                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                                E≈mc2
                                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                                -Bob B.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X