Announcement

Collapse

Creation Science Rules

This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective.
Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed.
1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team
2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
See more
See less

What is the best explanation for Polystrate Fossils?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Why IS it a fact?
    His admitted trust of those whom he calls "experts" is all he has given, and all he has to give to account for why he calls his non-fact, "fact".

    What evidence do you have to support your claim that what you call "evidence" is evidence?

    MAGA (Masking America's Gullible Apes)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Jonahdog View Post
      Doesnt count.
      We know. You hate peer-review.

      Don't come back.
      Where is the evidence for a global flood?
      E≈mc2
      "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

      "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
      -Bob B.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Jonahdog View Post

        Where should I get my information on the age of the universe from?
        You've already said "that the earth is billions of years old is a fact", so it shouldn't be too hard.

        Discuss how we can determine the age of the earth scientifically.
        All of my ancestors are human.
        Originally posted by Squeaky
        That explains why your an idiot.
        Originally posted by God's Truth
        Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
        Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
        (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

        1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
        (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

        Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

        Comment


        • Peer reviewed consensus can't be trusted today because most who believe in a young earth keep it to themselves because they fear being defunded, losing tenure, etc.
          WARNING: Graphic video here.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Jefferson View Post
            Peer reviewed consensus can't be trusted today because most who believe in a young earth keep it to themselves because they fear being defunded, losing tenure, etc.
            By definition, every advance in science is made in spite of the peer-review process.
            Where is the evidence for a global flood?
            E≈mc2
            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
            -Bob B.

            Comment



            • "...the Tapeat Sandstone. That sandstone can be traced right across North America, up into Canada and across to Greenland. We see the same sandstone with the same features and the same relative position in the stack-of-pancake layers across northern Africa all the way to southern Israel."



              https://youtu.be/Q9yc3BdeSds?t=168
              Where is the evidence for a global flood?
              E≈mc2
              "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

              "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
              -Bob B.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Jonahdog View Post

                Where should I get my information on the age of the universe from?
                The information on the age of the universe is the fact that the universe is less than about 10,000 years old, so, you already have that information on the age of the universe. But, if you did not already have that information, why then, naturally, the only source whence you could get that information would be someone who is dispensing that information.

                See, it's not that you don't have, and need to get information on the age of the universe--it's that you have already got, and yet are irrationally at war with that information. You reject that information and, instead, you embrace disinformation on the age of the universe, by eagerly embracing the Darwin cheerleaders' silly slogan that the universe is billions of years old.
                What evidence do you have to support your claim that what you call "evidence" is evidence?

                MAGA (Masking America's Gullible Apes)

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Jefferson View Post
                  Peer reviewed consensus can't be trusted today because most who believe in a young earth keep it to themselves because they fear being defunded, losing tenure, etc.
                  What would you say the personal beliefs of scientists have to do with the peer review process?

                  Stuart

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Stuu View Post
                    What would you say the personal beliefs of scientists have to do with the peer review process?

                    Stuart
                    Bias
                    All of my ancestors are human.
                    Originally posted by Squeaky
                    That explains why your an idiot.
                    Originally posted by God's Truth
                    Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
                    Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
                    (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

                    1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
                    (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

                    Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Stuu View Post
                      What would you say the personal beliefs of scientists have to do with the peer review process?

                      Stuart
                      Their primary personal belief is to be able to continue to feed their children which they won't be able to do if they espouse something that the current mob in control is against.

                      WARNING: Graphic video here.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Stuu View Post
                        What would you say the personal beliefs of scientists have to do with the peer review process?

                        Stuart
                        Notice how this question could never do anything to contribute to a sensible discussion.

                        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                        E≈mc2
                        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                        -Bob B.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Right Divider View Post
                          Discuss how we can determine the age of the earth scientifically.
                          1. Rocks on Earth:
                          Zircons found in Western Australia date by uranium-lead radioisotope dating to 4.37 billion years old.

                          2. The Holy Wikipedia summarises the following dates for meteorites:

                          Statistics for several meteorites that have undergone isochron dating are as follows:
                          1. Pb-Pb isochron 4.543 ± 0.019 billion years
                          2. Sm-Nd isochron 4.55 ± 0.33 billion years
                          3. Rb-Sr isochron 4.51 ± 0.15 billion years
                          4. Re-Os isochron 4.68 ± 0.15 billion years
                          1. Pb-Pb isochron 4.556 ± 0.012 billion years
                          2. Pb-Pb isochron 4.540 ± 0.001 billion years
                          3. Sm-Nd isochron 4.56 ± 0.08 billion years
                          4. Rb-Sr isochron 4.50 ± 0.07 billion years
                          1. Pb-Pb isochron 4.553 ± 0.004 billion years
                          2. Ar-Ar age spectrum 4.52 ± 0.02 billion years
                          3. Ar-Ar age spectrum 4.55 ± 0.03 billion years
                          4. Ar-Ar age spectrum 4.56 ± 0.05 billion years

                          3. The density of cosmic ray tracks left in surface moon rocks corresponds to an age of 4.51 billion years old.


                          What further discussion would be of particular interest to you?

                          Stuart
                          Last edited by Stuu; July 15, 2020, 11:50 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Jefferson View Post
                            Their primary personal belief is to be able to continue to feed their children which they won't be able to do if they espouse something that the current mob in control is against.
                            Perhaps I should have started one step back: what is your understanding of what scientific peer review is, and how it works in practice?

                            Stuart

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                              Notice how this question could never do anything to contribute to a sensible discussion.
                              Isn't 'sensible' a matter of opinion?

                              Stuart

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Stuu View Post
                                Isn't 'sensible' a matter of opinion?

                                Stuart
                                Notice how this question could never do anything to contribute to a sensible discussion.
                                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                                E≈mc2
                                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                                -Bob B.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X