Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Battle Royale VIII applicants wanted!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LightSon
    replied
    Maybe we could get John Piper to debate the closed side.
    (or did I already make that suggestion)?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry Shugart
    replied
    Originally posted by Turbo

    No. Sorry, I've been a little busy this week. I just heard from Jeremy though. We should be able to get going soon.
    Turbo,

    If Jeremy would like to broaden the scope of the debate we could also argue whether or not the "Twelve" are members of the Church,which is His Body.

    In His grace,--Jerry

    Leave a comment:


  • Freak
    replied
    Originally posted by Jerry Shugart

    Excuse me if I am getting impatient,but I was told quite some time ago that Jeremy and I would be debating (on Battle Royale VIII) whether or not "works" were required for salvation in regard to the Jews.

    Are they having second thoughts?

    In His grace,--Jerry
    I wonder if Turbo also believes works were necessary for salvation, at one time?

    Leave a comment:


  • Turbo
    replied
    No. Sorry, I've been a little busy this week. I just heard from Jeremy though. We should be able to get going soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry Shugart
    replied
    Excuse me if I am getting impatient,but I was told quite some time ago that Jeremy and I would be debating (on Battle Royale VIII) whether or not "works" were required for salvation in regard to the Jews.

    Are they having second thoughts?

    In His grace,--Jerry

    Leave a comment:


  • jjjg
    replied
    Still waiting for a reply, Knight!

    Leave a comment:


  • LightSon
    replied
    This may go without saying, but I'll say it anyway. My main interest is in seeing honest and able participants. As a counterexample, it will do no good to bring in a Calvinist who is not well-equipped to defend. In such a case, any "conclusion" of a formal debate will be meaningless.

    Leave a comment:


  • jjjg
    replied
    Sure is slow for Kinght to reply.

    Leave a comment:


  • Freak
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • jjjg
    replied
    If you have someone to defend the open view, I will defend the closed view.

    Leave a comment:


  • add yasaf
    replied
    huh

    Knight quote - Sorry Add but you do not have a consistent position.


    That is the one thing that I do have!! Isn't that the point of debating?! I am sure you think that all the other positions are inconsistent that are not your own. The fact of the matter is, is that I know what the Calvinist position is as well as the Arminian position just as well as anybody.

    What I would do in a debate is clearly state which angle I might be coming from to make my point. For instance, God being able to see all our time at once works for either the Calvinist or Arminian.

    In any event, that would be one of the things to debate. I am simply surprised that you would stoop to that level without argumentation as to why my view is inconsistent, by just saying that it is.

    If my view does the best justice to most of Scripture which I believe it does than there is no problem. Of course that is what debate is all about!

    Leave a comment:


  • jjjg
    replied
    Knight, clearly define open and closed theology and I will tell you if I can argue a point of view on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • jjjg
    replied
    hOW ABOUT US?

    Leave a comment:


  • Knight
    replied
    Re: scared??

    Originally posted by add yasaf

    Knight quote - The trouble is.....

    Finding anyone willing to debate the closed view!



    Knight, I already said I would do it. Bring it on! What are you scared of?
    Sorry Add but you do not have a consistent position.

    Leave a comment:


  • Greywolf
    replied
    Originally posted by jjjg
    Hello knight. We're ready to go!
    I think he may have found someone to defend the other side of the original debate topic.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X