Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Israel's Prophetic Clock stopped in 70AD, not in Mid Acts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by patrick jane View Post
    When did Israel fall and the gentiles brought in ?

    Ephesians 1:10 KJV -
    First of all, dispensation is an anarthrous noun in that passage (not an articular noun, and not a verb). Since Englishizers have no idea what that means, it can't even be discussed.

    When it has the wrong cargo, a truck has to be unloaded before or as it is loaded. This isn't merely a lack of information. It's the replacement of linguistic meaning with false linguistic pseudo-meaning.
    Ecclesia reformata et semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei
    “The Church reformed and always reforming, according to the Word of God.”

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by PneumaPsucheSoma View Post
      You wouldn't understand the answer because you filter everything through a false gospel among many false gospels.

      If you knew what sin was, I might be able to tell you.
      Is it ontological?
      Originally posted by Interplanner
      They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
      Originally posted by Interplanner
      You're too literal to get it.
      Originally posted by Interplanner
      The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
        Is it ontological?
        ROFL!

        We don't tell our children fairy tales so that they will know that monsters exist.
        They already know monsters exist.
        We tell our children fairy tales so that they will know that monsters can be killed.

        Comment


        • #64
          When did Abraham, or Isaac, or Jacob, or Jacob's 12 sons ever inherit the land promised?

          We don't tell our children fairy tales so that they will know that monsters exist.
          They already know monsters exist.
          We tell our children fairy tales so that they will know that monsters can be killed.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Tambora View Post
            When did Abraham, or Isaac, or Jacob, or Jacob's 12 sons ever inherit the land promised?
            When Joshua and the Israelites crossed the Jordan into the Promised Land.

            (Joshua 21:43) So the Lord gave Israel all the land he had sworn to give their ancestors, and they took possession of it and settled there.

            And:
            (Joshua 21:45) Not one of all the Lord’s good promises to Israel failed; every one was fulfilled.
            (1 Cor 1:13 KJV) Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
              Is it ontological?
              Ultimately, yes.

              Laugh on, oh scoffer of truth.
              Ecclesia reformata et semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei
              “The Church reformed and always reforming, according to the Word of God.”

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by PneumaPsucheSoma View Post
                Ultimately, yes.

                Laugh on, oh scoffer of truth.
                Assume I understand what sin is, ontologically.
                What is the gospel by which you were saved?
                Originally posted by Interplanner
                They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                Originally posted by Interplanner
                You're too literal to get it.
                Originally posted by Interplanner
                The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Tambora View Post
                  When did Abraham, or Isaac, or Jacob, or Jacob's 12 sons ever inherit the land promised?
                  All you and your Judaizing peers can focus on is some parcel of real estate while the eternal Son of God was manifest in human flesh of the dust of the ground and became the everlasting Promised Land to fulfill ALL covenants and redeem our mortal corruptible flesh for the promise of being clothed upon with immortality and incorruptibility as His bride and one flesh with her Husband for all everlasting.

                  Sad that you think you're part of the new covenant.
                  Ecclesia reformata et semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei
                  “The Church reformed and always reforming, according to the Word of God.”

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by PneumaPsucheSoma View Post
                    Sad that you think you're part of the new covenant.
                    She does? I think you are wrong about Tambora...ontologically.
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    You're too literal to get it.
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                      Assume I understand what sin is, ontologically.
                      I can't. You don't.
                      Ecclesia reformata et semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei
                      “The Church reformed and always reforming, according to the Word of God.”

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by PneumaPsucheSoma View Post
                        I can't. You don't.
                        You can't ontologically? Or won't ontologically?
                        Originally posted by Interplanner
                        They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                        Originally posted by Interplanner
                        You're too literal to get it.
                        Originally posted by Interplanner
                        The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                          She does? I think you are wrong about Tambora...ontologically.
                          I notice you skipped the part about exalting some parcel of dirt while denying Christ as the everlasting Promised Land.

                          That's why you Dispos aren't in Christ.
                          Ecclesia reformata et semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei
                          “The Church reformed and always reforming, according to the Word of God.”

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                            You can't ontologically? Or won't ontologically?
                            I can't assume you understand anything. You don't.
                            Ecclesia reformata et semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei
                            “The Church reformed and always reforming, according to the Word of God.”

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by PneumaPsucheSoma View Post
                              I notice you skipped the part about exalting some parcel of dirt while denying Christ as the everlasting Promised Land.

                              That's why you Dispos aren't in Christ.
                              Parcel of dirt. Did God put his name on that Land, ontologically?
                              Originally posted by Interplanner
                              They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                              Originally posted by Interplanner
                              You're too literal to get it.
                              Originally posted by Interplanner
                              The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by PneumaPsucheSoma View Post
                                I can't assume you understand anything. You don't.
                                You are entitled to your assumptions...ontologically.
                                Originally posted by Interplanner
                                They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                                Originally posted by Interplanner
                                You're too literal to get it.
                                Originally posted by Interplanner
                                The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X