28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
What is the testament it superseded for remission?
The Judaic old testament.
No, it was rejected and awaits future fulfillment.Was it received at pentecost? If not when?
I have no idea what you're talking about, but it sounds confused.Would you both agree that Matt 26:28 is a new testimony for remission of sin?
I have no idea what you're talking about, but it sounds confused.
False accusations from a Bible blender....Kingdom deniers think the new testament in Jesus' blood is so impotent that it had the ability be rejected.
Who has the power of rejection in God's economy of redemption? God alone; and He rejects all, both Jews and Gentiles, who do not come to Him by faith. For there is no difference. Rom 10:12KJV
Parties involved:The blood of the old covenant was taken from animals. The blood of the new covenant was given by Jesus upon the cross.
New Covenant: God and Israel.
28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
What is the testament it superseded for remission?
False accusations from a Bible blender....
The kingdom WILL come... just not yet... just like the Bible says.
Because they were to look forward to the kingdom. Where is the problem?Why did Jesus teach the apostles to pray; "thy kingdom come..."? So they could be disappointed?
Because they were to look forward to the kingdom. Where is the problem?
The kingdom WILL come when Jesus returns to establish it. Just like the Bible says.
You are using fallacious logic. You are begging the question.How do people look forward to a kingdom that does not appear in their lifetime?
He also said "thy will be done as it is in heaven".
Why would He have them pray this prayer?
You are, once again, making false accusations about me.Your problem is you don't believe God's will is being done. His will has been changed to your expectations and that requires you push it off to the future for fulfillment.
That is a commonly misunderstood passage.He told His disciples; "But I tell you of a truth, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God." Luk 9:27KJV
More fallacious logic.The Kingdom is here and you missed it. There is no difference between that and the Pharisees not recognizing their King when He appeared.
More misunderstood scripture. Christ said that He would go to receive His kingdom and to return."And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power." Mar 9:1KJV
You are using fallacious logic. You are begging the question.
You assume that the kingdom had to come immediately. Jesus explained, on a number of occasions, that this was not the fact.
Luk 19:11-12 KJV And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear. (12) He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.
The kingdom comes when Christ RETURNS with it.
Yes. He sits on that throne now. It is called the heavenly Jerusalem. The physical Jerusalem is not a fit place for the Lord of Lords and the King of Kings.In the kingdom, Christ the King will sit on the throne of His father David in Jerusalem.
If you partake of the Lord's Supper you are eating and drinking at His table in His Kingdom.More misunderstood scripture. Christ said that He would go to receive His kingdom and to return.Luk 22:18 KJV For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.
Luk 22:29-30 KJV And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me; (30) That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
Testament as a new testimony given by Christ for remission as compared to Acts 2:38
I'm asking that this verse be looked at as a testimony not a covenant or anything other than a testimony...
1.
a person's will, especially the part relating to personal property.
2.
something that serves as a sign or evidence of a specified fact, event, or quality.
"growing attendance figures are a testament to the event's popularity"
synonyms: testimony, witness, evidence, proof, attestation;
...and compare it to...
Act 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost
...as for remission for sins.
What are the differences and if Matt 26:28 is new testimony then it must have superseded the old testimony for remission of sins.