Drug Dealing and the Bible

Nazaroo

New member
By the way DRUG DEALING is in fact mentioned specifically in the New Testament and condemned, in the original Greek.

We had a long thread on this only a year or two ago.

It can be found here:

Pharmakeia: Drug-Dealing in the New Testament



We suggest anyone interested in what the New Testament really says about drugs and drug dealers should go here.

Here is a quotation from that thread:


------------------------------------------------------------
Drug Dealers In the Bible? Where?

Drug dealing is treated gravely and severely condemned in the New Testament: 5 times.

(Gal.5:20, Rev.9:21, 18:23, 21:8, 22:15, original Greek)

Paul Spoke out against Drug Dealing:
Gal 5:20 "Now the works of the flesh are OBVIOUS: sexual immorality, uncleanness, ... DRUG DEALING ( pharmakeia )...and things like these I am warning you, THOSE WHO DO THEM WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD!"
John also Speaks out against Drugs:
Rev. 9:21 "Nor did they even repent of their murders or their DRUG DEALING (ton pharmakon) or their sexual immorality or their robbery."

Rev 22:15 "OUTSIDE (heaven) are the dogs and the DRUG DEALERS (hoi pharmakoi), and everyone who practises falsehood."

Rev 18:23 Babylon the Great City has fallen...All nations were deceived by your DRUG DEALING (en te pharmakeia)"

Rev 21:8 "But as for the ...DRUG DEALERS (pharmakois) their place will be in the Lake of Fire, which is the Second Death!"


Why Should we translate 'pharmakoi' as Drug Dealers?


The Greek word ‘pharmakeia’ has been used since 500 years before Jesus’ time to refer to the buying and selling of drugs for both recreational and medical purposes, and also to refer to quacks selling ‘miracle cures’ etc. This is the very word we get our modern English word ‘Pharmacy’ from, to refer to a dealer or supplier of drugs, a drug store.

Why isn't this in my English Translation?

It has been known since ancient times that the word means ‘drug dealing’. Abundant references in Classical literature show this beyond dispute. In English bibles the term ‘drug dealing’ was deliberately avoided and a completely different word, ‘sorcery’ put in its place. This is was not just due to superstitious ignorance.
During the Middle Ages the Church became the largest manufacturer and supplier of the most popular drug on earth: ALCOHOL. The church sold out to the drug dealing industry, and God’s Word was intentionally kept obscure.
To this day, the Western Church not only makes its own wine for religious use, but also sells it commercially through various monasteries and companies.

There may have been some 'excuse' for this sorry state of affairs in the 16th century, before drug dealing was widely understood and formally criminalized. However, in the 21st century there really is no excuse for failing to properly render the original Greek, and make the truth plain.



Are Drug Dealers Really Going to be Destroyed?

This is the million dollar question! In recent times, some Universalists have tried to re-interpret the bible to support the idea that all people are ultimately saved. When Revelation says,
Rev 21:8 "But as for the ...DRUG DEALERS (pharmakois) their place will be in the Lake of Fire, which is the Second Death!"
...the Universalists would have us believe it should be rendered,

"...their PART will be in the Lake of Fire, ..."

In this interpretation, a person's 'part' or 'portion' refers to his works and/or collected earnings for good and bad deeds. From this idea they want you to believe that only their 'bad works' will pass through a kind of testing fire, but the drug dealers themselves (and other extreme criminals) and their souls will be saved, thus 'fulfilling the scriptures' in a humane way.

But can this interpretation hold up? Sadly, NO. For safeguarding the meaning here and removing any ambiguity, the action of the Lake of Fire is plainly identified by the following phrase:

"...the Lake of Fire, which is the Second Death!"



Ordinary Death versus the Second Death

Now ordinary death is horrifying enough: it is often inconvenient, humiliating, slow, painful, and terrifying, especially if the death is a crime being perpetrated upon an innocent victim. We may hope in an afterlife, but death is quite serious, even for sincerely spiritual people. And the New Testament doesn't avoid the issue, or flower it up with euphemisms. Instead it warns seekers of God that bad things can happen.
"you (disciples) will be persecuted: handed over to courts and imprisoned... betrayed even by friends and relatives, and some of you put to death... and hated by all for My name's sake, ...but not a hair of your head will ultimately be lost!" (Luke 21:12f)
Of course we shouldn't be surprised. The very existance of 'sin' can mean that innocent or at least undeserving people can suffer. By definition, murder is killing someone who shouldn't be killed. Experience shows that even children can be victimized, and even good people can still make mistakes that cause injury or cost lives.

Yet we should not exaggerate ordinary death: there are things more terrible than death:
"Don't be afraid of those who kill the body and afterward can do no more.
I will tell you who to fear: Fear Him who, after He has killed,
has the power to cast into hellfire!"
(Luke 12:4,5)
This is clearly the Second Death, and is to be feared far more than death.


According to Revelation it is applied against criminals, and evil men. And yet it is also clear from all the warnings, that all men are at risk: that any man could find himself facing the Second Death, if he committed a serious enough sin.

Even John, the Apostle of Love warns us of the gravity of certain sins. He says there is a 'sin that leads to Death', and actually tells Christians NOT to pray for those who commit such sins!
If anyone sees a brother commit a sin that is not a deadly sin, he can pray, and God will extend life to his brother, ...provided it is NOT a deadly sin: There is sin that leads to death: and I am NOT saying that you should pray in that case! (1 John 5:16)
Wow, not only are some people going to be destroyed, but we aren't even supposed to pray for them.



Ordinary Judgement versus Special Judgement: The Second Death

How could the Universalists get it so wrong? Simple: what they are talking about is the common Judgement that everyone faces. All people will have their works, good and bad, judged by God on Judgement Day. Of all the works and deeds, whatever is built upon sand will pass away. (James 5:1-4).

But every sincere Christian or seeker of God believes in God's fair judgement, and certainly doesn't need to fear it. (1 John 4:18) Even if my earthly deeds may turn out to be of little value, I will certainly be grateful to at least be judged fairly, and I'll be happy to make it to heaven, even if I am not much of a hero.


The Horrific Second Death:


But ordinary judgement simply CAN'T be what every Apostle was frantically warning us about! What they are talking about can only be the ultimate penalty for evil works: Pain, self-pity and horror, ending in utter destruction without appeal, as God hands out His Final Devastating Judgement. It makes sense to fear this!
John: "You are well aware that no murderer has eternal life remaining in him."

Peter: "If the righteous are scarcely saved, what will happen to the wicked?"

James: "Faith without deeds is useless!...it is by deeds, not just believing, that someone is justified."

Hebrews: "Whoever breaks the Law is ruthlessly put to death...and you may be sure that anyone who tramples on the Son of God, and who treats the blood of the Covenant as unholy, and insults the Spirit will be condemned to a far more severe punishment."

Paul: "...I am warning you, THOSE WHO DO THESE THINGS WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD!"

Jesus: "No one who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will be forgiven."

1 John 3:15/1 Peter 4:18/James 2:20-24/Heb 10:28-29/Gal. 5:20/Luke 12:10

Obviously what these apostles are talking about is NOT ordinary Judgement of men and their works, where the chaff is burnt off, and the wheat remains, or the slag is removed, from true gold through a cleansing fire. Instead, here we are warned of a dire consequence worse than death, an irreversible and violent destruction.


The Book of Revelation is supported by every apostle and leader of the New Testament, although its detailed description of God's Final Judgement is unique. Some who suffer the Wrath of God clearly do NOT repent, and so are NOT saved, but are cast into God's garbage can:
"When it happens, those people will long for death but not find it anywhere!"

"But the survivors of the first plagues refused to repent, or stop their murders, DRUG DEALING, sexual immorality, or robbery."

"This is the Second Death: the Lake of Fire. And anyone whose name was not found written in the Book of Life was thrown into the Lake of Fire."

"And the Demon (Diabolos) who had deceived them was also thrown into the Lake of Fire and Sulfur, where the Beast and False Prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night, aeon after aeon." (Revelation 9:6,21, 20:15 20:10)
This makes it clear that the doctrine of Universal Salvation is bankrupt, and is not supported by the New Testament as a whole.

Anyone can be saved, but not everyone will be.



Of course God doesn't wish anyone to perish, but wishes that all might have Eternal Life. (John 3:16-17)


God is not Mocked

But according to the New Testament view, God's Divine nature, which gives men everywhere ample opportunity to repent, has a complimentary side which ultimately requires justice and fairness, and results in a Final Judgement for some.

God won't force people to repent,
but He will certainly destroy them if they refuse to.




No Hope for Drug Dealers?

We have seen that some people are not saved but are thrown into the Lake of Fire, and some of those who are thrown into the Lake of Fire are DRUG DEALERS. But is God referring to ALL drug dealers, or just some of them?


Jesus made it clear that there are 'small' sins and 'large' sins (Matthew 23:23). We have already seen that some sins lead to death, or worse. (1 John 5:16, Heb.10:28-29), and horrific punishments are prophesied in Revelation. Now please note again that Paul doesn't hesitate grouping DRUG DEALING alongside the worst sins that lead certainly to death and exclude Eternal Life also.
Gal 5:20 "...DRUG DEALING...and things like these I am warning you, THOSE WHO DO THEM WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD!"
And Paul is not just talking about a handful of ringleaders, or some international drug lords only: He warns ordinary church goers that committing these sins leads to death and disqualifies you for Eternal Life! That's pretty much EVERY DRUG DEALER, since it even includes backsliding Christians!

But wait, there may still be hope for a repentant DRUG DEALER: God is not an unjust Judge. We can hope He will make some allowance for ignorance, poverty, deception, or unreasonable circumstances. And indeed, Jesus gives us some hope here:
"The one who knew what his Master wanted, but didn't do it will get a severe beating, but he who did NOT know and earned a beating will get a lighter beating."
(Luke 12:47-48)
A DRUG DEALER who is STILL ALIVE, and capable of repenting and stopping his crimes, could receive forgiveness and be saved:
"As I live," says the Lord God, "I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but prefer the wicked turn back from their evil and live. Turn back! Repent of your evil, for why should you die?" (Ezekiel 33:11)
On the other hand, a Christian who falls away from his faithfulness and commits crimes like DRUG DEALING and murder is in danger of the severest Judgement:
"But the righteous won't be able to count on their righteousness if they sin: If they trust in their righteousness and commit sin, none of their righteous deeds will be remembered! But in the sin they have committed, they will die." (Ezek 33:12-13)


"Don't be deceived, for God is not mocked: Whatever you sow, you will reap." (Gal. 6:7)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Nazaroo

New member
Does this mean the nice CVS clerk who sells me my son's insulin is going to hell?

If he was one of the co-conspirators that helped to give your son diabetes, and got him hooked on insulin, yes.

On the other hand, if your son got diabetes from following your advice in breaking the Biblical Food Laws of the Noahic Covenant, then I think you'll be going to hell instead, rather than the local cashier at the drugstore.

Was it you who allowed him to indulge in endless sugar-feedings as a kid, or did you allow him to use recreational drugs as a teen, because everyone else did too?

If those scenarios are familiar, I'd say you live in the neighborhood of modern Sodom. Gated community will take on a whole new meaning soon.

I think a lot of people will be surprised when Johnson & Johnson, Dow Chemical and hundreds of "legal" drug pushers are lined up alongside crack dealers and heroin pushers and thrown into the Lake of Fire.

There is a lot more built on sand, and which will pass away, than you can imagine at the moment.

peace
Nazaroo
 

Tyrathca

New member
If he was one of the co-conspirators that helped to give your son diabetes, and got him hooked on insulin, yes.
Please stop, the stupid is hurting my brain... Did you even know that insulin is a naturally occuring hormone in our body?
On the other hand, if your son got diabetes from following your advice in breaking the Biblical Food Laws of the Noahic Covenant, then I think you'll be going to hell instead, rather than the local cashier at the drugstore.
Sooooo... A two year old is not only able to break these laws etc but also must be punished by being stricken by an autoimmune disease? How does this make sense to you?
(I'm not sure how old his kid was when he got diabetes but it can occur at 2 y.o or even earlier)
Was it you who allowed him to indulge in endless sugar-feedings as a kid, or did you allow him to use recreational drugs as a teen, because everyone else did too?
Hey genius, before you criticise someone for allowing their kid to get a disease how about actually learning about it first. Almost universally the cause of insulin dependant diabetes in juveniles is type 1 diabetes which is an autoimmune disease. Type 2 diabetes is the version caused by diet. Type 1 is partly genetic and suspected to be triggered by a viral infection though its cause (like most autoimmune diseases) is largely unknown. What we do know about it though is that it is not at all linked with drug use or diet.
I think a lot of people will be surprised when Johnson & Johnson, Dow Chemical and hundreds of "legal" drug pushers are lined up alongside crack dealers and heroin pushers and thrown into the Lake of Fire.
Yeah because saving childrens lives with vital medication is sooooo evil....
 

Nazaroo

New member
Please stop, the stupid is hurting my brain... Did you even know that insulin is a naturally occuring hormone in our body?

You pretend to speak on behalf of "science", and yet your argument is about as intelligent as that of a pot-smoker arguing in favor of marijuana:

"Hey, man, its 'natural', so its a-okay! Light up a spliff man."

A Deadly Nightshade is also a natural plant, and so are thousands of other poisonous and harmful substances which are 'natural', including Uranium ore, which sterilizes and causes cancer upon exposure.

Obviously, "natural" is a bogus unscientific argument.

There are literally some six million 'natural' chemicals and hormones manufactured by the liver. Hundreds of thousands of them are essentially poisons if taken in significant quantities. They have purpose only in the context of very limited and carefully controlled bodily processes. You can't just inject them into your body because they are "natural".

But I am not arguing that true diabetes conditions, such as the absence of destruction of the Isles of Langerhans in the Pancreas may pr may not require insulin injections to digest double sugars, or regulate blood-sugar levels.

I spoke to the CAUSE of most diabetic conditions, not the legitimacy or necessity of current treatments (although I could take those on too, on a scientific basis).


Sooooo... A two year old is not only able to break these laws etc but also must be punished by being stricken by an autoimmune disease? How does this make sense to you?
(I'm not sure how old his kid was when he got diabetes but it can occur at 2 y.o or even earlier)

Again your non-sequitous argument completely misses the point.

FIrst of all lets talk objective reality, and scientific historical fact:

The sins of others DO INDEED cause innocent people (often children) to suffer unjustly. This is a historical fact, and one that continues today and in the foreseeable future.

Acknowledging this does not mean I condone or approve of innocent people suffering. The very fact that it is wrong is why I speak out against drug companies for instance, and the harm they do to innocent, unknowing people, who buy into their B.S. and use their products, thus suffering harm.

Since you know nothing about "this kid", why are you explaining the situation you know nothing about to me? Why isn't Koban speaking for himself? Are you Koban? How many aliases do you have?


Hey genius, before you criticise someone for allowing their kid to get a disease how about actually learning about it first. Almost universally the cause of insulin dependant diabetes in juveniles is type 1 diabetes which is an autoimmune disease.

you may be right here, in which case it changes nothing.

auto-immune diseases in children can be traced to the millions of ineffective, needless, and poisonous innoculations which they are forced to receive because of Draconian and Malthusian policies designed to poison and kill of the poor, ethnic minorities, and other undesirables, which are carried out by Rich European NeoNazis.

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=47&contentid=6154

Type 2 diabetes is the version caused by diet. Type 1 is partly genetic and suspected to be triggered by a viral infection though its cause (like most autoimmune diseases) is largely unknown. What we do know about it though is that it is not at all linked with drug use or diet. Yeah because saving childrens lives with vital medication is sooooo evil....

You can't have it both ways. Either the cause is "largely unknown" (meaning there is a huge coverup), or else you do know. But since you don't, it is very likely that both kinds of 'diabetes' (included false diagnoses to make even more money for pharmaceutical companies) are indeed linked to drug use (OVER the counter) and diet (North-American foolishness).
 

Tyrathca

New member
You pretend to speak on behalf of "science", and yet your argument is about as intelligent as that of a pot-smoker arguing in favor of marijuana:

"Hey, man, its 'natural', so its a-okay! Light up a spliff man."

A Deadly Nightshade is also a natural plant, and so are thousands of other poisonous and harmful substances which are 'natural', including Uranium ore, which sterilizes and causes cancer upon exposure.

Obviously, "natural" is a bogus unscientific argument.
False analogy, all those examples were from other organisms. I never argued that it is Ok because it is found naturally in the environment, I argued it is OK because it is found naturally IN US i.e. its MEANT to be there.
There are literally some six million 'natural' chemicals and hormones manufactured by the liver. Hundreds of thousands of them are essentially poisons if taken in significant quantities. They have purpose only in the context of very limited and carefully controlled bodily processes. You can't just inject them into your body because they are "natural".
Now an appropriate analogy, yet again you show your ignorance. First of all almost everything is toxic given the right dose (even water - and I don't mean drowning). Second of all insulin is created by the pancreas not the liver. Third the dosages given to type 1 diabetics is not "significant", in fact it is meant to mimic the amount that they would produce if they were healthy.
But I am not arguing that true diabetes conditions, such as the absence of destruction of the Isles of Langerhans in the Pancreas may pr may not require insulin injections to digest double sugars, or regulate blood-sugar levels.
That IS type 1 diabetes.... So what are you arguing against?
I spoke to the CAUSE of most diabetic conditions, not the legitimacy or necessity of current treatments (although I could take those on too, on a scientific basis).
You did both. As for the cause, which one as you mentioned several? Breaking the biblical laws? Sugary diet? (That one causes type 2 diabetes, not type 1) Drugs? (Causes neither, but can be responsible for other diseases) What?

Since you know nothing about "this kid", why are you explaining the situation you know nothing about to me? Why isn't Koban speaking for himself? Are you Koban? How many aliases do you have?
I know he is a kid and he has diabetes. I don't need to know much else. This kid could not exist for all it matters since there are thousands of other real living kids in exactly the same situation as I am describing. I actually have a cousin with type 1 diabetes so we could talk about him if you want. And no I am not Koban, thats just silly.

you may be right here, in which case it changes nothing.

auto-immune diseases in children can be traced to the millions of ineffective, needless, and poisonous innoculations which they are forced to receive because of Draconian and Malthusian policies designed to poison and kill of the poor, ethnic minorities, and other undesirables, which are carried out by Rich European NeoNazis.

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=47&contentid=6154
Oh dear.... Maybe I really am wasting my time here.
First there is no link between immunisationsa and autoimmune disease. There is real research into this which I can cite if you want, actual journal article peer reviewed research not funded by drug companies, though I wonder if should waste my time (it would take me 10-15 minutes probably). Do you have any evidence that there is a link other than a random article on a random website that posits no evidence/sources for its claims?

You can't have it both ways. Either the cause is "largely unknown" (meaning there is a huge coverup), or else you do know. But since you don't, it is very likely that both kinds of 'diabetes' (included false diagnoses to make even more money for pharmaceutical companies) are indeed linked to drug use (OVER the counter) and diet (North-American foolishness).
We KNOW what causes type 2 diabetes, the evidence is unanimous and unequivocally in favour of genetics, diet/weight/exercise and occassionally some medical conditions like polycystic ovarian syndrome. Type 1 (a different disease) we don't know the cause but that doesn't mean we can't know what ISN'T the cause, all we simply have to do is do epidemiological studies and see if there is a correlation between getting T1DM and the factor being measured. So far one of the few links is genetic but this is not the sole cause (it results in a high relative risk but still does not result in a high absolute risk). Not knowing the cause is no more a cover-up than not knowing how to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity is a cover up. Like many things we just need more research.
 

Nazaroo

New member
Jesus did drugs. You could also say he dealed them by turning water into wine.

only a Russian Communist alcoholic would take the Cana-Wedding story literally, in order to justify boozing.


The real Jesus did no miracle at Cana turning 180 gallons of water into alcohol for an already dangerously drunk crowd of losers, unless he intended to kill them.

The fact is, this is a parable meant to divert the authorities from the real first 'sign', which was the Temple Cleansing, a plain revolutionary and political act and one which the Jewish authorities and Romans took seriously and crucified him for.

Anderson & Structure of John

The Cana Story is a substitute story read publicly while the Church was still an underground movement. The real story, the Temple Cleansing, was read only in private.

peace
Nazaroo
 
Last edited:

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
I see Nazaroo's acting crazier than usual.

Somebody should take some of the same stuff he's griping about and calm down...
 

TomO

Get used to it.
Hall of Fame
only a Russian Communist alcoholic would take the Cana-Wedding story literally, in order to justify boozing.


The real Jesus did no miracle at Cana turning 180 gallons of water into alcohol for an already dangerously drunk crowd of losers, unless he intended to kill them.

The fact is, this is a parable meant to divert the authorities from the real first 'sign', which was the Temple Cleansing, a plain revolutionary and political act and one which the Jewish authorities and Romans took seriously and crucified him for.

http://adultera.awardspace.com/INT-EV/anderson2.html#s06

The Cana Story is a substitute story read publicly while the Church was still an underground movement. The real story, the Temple Cleansing, was read only in private.

peace
Nazaroo

Gee....I thought you were going to post something crazy...like it was Grape Juice or something.....I'm glad I was proved wrong. :doh:
 

koban

New member
Well, I just finished the drugs provided by my local supermarket (caffeine in my coffee and aspirin). I do feel sorry for the checkout clerk, who is, apparently, going to hell for selling them to me. :(
 

TomO

Get used to it.
Hall of Fame
Well, I just finished the drugs provided by my local supermarket (caffeine in my coffee and aspirin). I do feel sorry for the checkout clerk, who is, apparently, going to hell for selling them to me. :(

:plain: Oh...they're totally Hellbound....just think of all the Tryptophan in meats, cheeses, eggs etc...
 

Selaphiel

Well-known member
Yeah those vaccines sure are a bother. They have erradicated true pleasures like this: (WARNING! IT IS A PICTURE OF DISEASES, NOT A PRETTY SIGHT. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.)

http://www.williams.edu/resources/chapin/graphics/Baltimore%20smallpox%201.jpg (SMALLPOX)

and

http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/global/david/dwe002/dwe002g/dwe00209g01.gif (POLIO)

Not vaccinating against dangerous diseases is highly immoral. You only contribute to the return of horrible diseases by giving them a growth basis.
 

Nazaroo

New member
Yeah those vaccines sure are a bother. They have erradicated true pleasures like this: (WARNING! IT IS A PICTURE OF DISEASES, NOT A PRETTY SIGHT. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.)

http://www.williams.edu/resources/chapin/graphics/Baltimore%20smallpox%201.jpg (SMALLPOX)

and

http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/global/david/dwe002/dwe002g/dwe00209g01.gif (POLIO)

Not vaccinating against dangerous diseases is highly immoral. You only contribute to the return of horrible diseases by giving them a growth basis.

What a shallow, cheap sensationalist trick:

Why not just post pictures of diseased vaginas to "prove" the current police policy on prostitution is correct, effective, and sincere?


How about real scientific evidence, instead of "shock & awe" tactics better reserved for brainwashing morons?

Polio Vaccine Causes Outbreak of Polio:

http://www.drudge.com/news/124148/live-polio-vaccine-causes-outbreak-nigeria
http://www.naturalnews.com/022508.html
http://www.worldchiropracticalliance.org/tcj/1997/dec/dec1997kent.htm
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/pdf_extract/2/5103/1040-b
http://njvaccinationchoice.org/homework.html

Vaccinations don't do anything but make millions of people sick, and make billions of dollars for drug companies.

Suckers.

Nazaroo
 
Top