Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

climate hockey stick defeated

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by genuineoriginal View Post
    With the windfarm offshore, it is hard to see all the dead birds, but the fish appreciate the extra food.

    You don't care about the birds, you just hate gubmint telling you what to do. Also anything "libruls" like.

    Besides . . .

    “We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.



    - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by way 2 go View Post
      are you ?

      Michael Mann lied with his chart
      ipcc used his chart because it fit their narrative
      No, he didn't. The chart is real. Continually confirmed by unprecedented weather and climatic events.
      “We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.



      - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Alate_One View Post
        unprecedented weather and climatic events.
        You'd think that if the earth were millions of years old, it would have settled down by now.

        I agree that there are unprecedented natural disasters, events, etc, but the "climate change" is simply a result of the global flood, and is not caused by humanity growing.

        We have people today who believe, as a result of so-called experts teaching that humanity is destroying the planet, that the only solution is to start decreasing the numbers of humans on the planet. It's one of the reasons given by a recent mass-shooter, saying something along the lines of him being the tool to decrease the number of humans.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Alate_One View Post

          You don't care about the birds, you just hate gubmint telling you what to do. Also anything "libruls" like.

          Besides . . .

          Cats need to eat.
          Wind turbines do not need to eat.
          Learn to read what is written.

          _____
          The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
          ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by genuineoriginal View Post
            With the windfarm offshore, it is hard to see all the dead birds, but the fish appreciate the extra food.


            Spoiler


            Will Wind Turbines Ever Be Safe For Birds?

            Wind turbines kill an estimated 140,000 to 328,000 birds each year in North America, making it the most threatening form of green energy.

            After a three-day blow from the North to North-East all the flotsam, dinghies, drifting craft, netting and other debris comes up on our beaches. but very few dead birds by comparison with North American statistics. I guess it all depends on where the wind turbines are? However if your stats are reason enough to hold wind power in a dark light, just take a look at how birds get killed by other means:- This from Google:-

            Wind turbines kill between 214,000 and 368,000 birds annually — a small fraction compared with the estimated 6.8 million fatalities from collisions with cell and radio towers and the 1.4 billion to 3.7 billion deaths from cats, according to the peer-reviewed study by two federal scientists and the environmental ...15 Sep 2014


            Got a mobile 'phone, have you?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
              You'd think that if the earth were millions of years old, it would have settled down by now.
              It doesn't work like that. :P

              I agree that there are unprecedented natural disasters, events, etc, but the "climate change" is simply a result of the global flood, and is not caused by humanity growing.
              You deny that CO2 is increasing in the atmosphere?

              We have people today who believe, as a result of so-called experts teaching that humanity is destroying the planet, that the only solution is to start decreasing the numbers of humans on the planet. It's one of the reasons given by a recent mass-shooter, saying something along the lines of him being the tool to decrease the number of humans.
              Humans are destroying the planet, however randomly killing people is obviously unethical and not going to help anyway. The scale of the problem is far too large.

              We need policy change to put the health and welfare of humanity and the planet first, over the profit margins of large corporations and shareholders. I would like to see my children, and hopefully grandchildren live in a world that is not so impoverished as to be unrecognizable.
              “We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.



              - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by genuineoriginal View Post
                Cats need to eat.
                Wind turbines do not need to eat.
                Cats don't provide clean energy. Wind turbines do. Cats are generally speaking, useless. People like them but they just use resources being warm and fluffy.

                If you want to help birds, ban cats.

                If you want to save the planet, we need wind turbines, solar panels and nuclear power plants.
                “We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.



                - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Right Divider View Post
                  Non-sequitur
                  Go on...... why not get yourself a hybrid?
                  They are amazing, will increase your range (per litre) by many miles, and if you get an IC failure you would be able to drive quite a long way for assistance.

                  And where I live you wouldn't have to pay much (if any) road tax.

                  Our scientists, politicians, engineers, power and transport specialists, and most of our folks are supporting a cleaner country, so we won't be listening to the denialists over what must be done to slow, reduce or put a brake on climate change.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Alate_One View Post
                    ... we need ... nuclear power plants.





                    and electric energy storage devices with an energy density surpassing petroleum derivatives

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by ok doser View Post



                      and electric energy storage devices with an energy density surpassing petroleum derivatives
                      All of the above, and more research into new energy technologies. But we need to have started 30 years ago, so we need accelerated implementation and research.
                      “We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.



                      - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Alate_One View Post
                        If you want to help birds, ban cats.
                        Neonics are much more of a problem for birds: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/e..._Yzl44nq2TgvgQ

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Alate_One View Post
                          No, he didn't. The chart is real. Continually confirmed by unprecedented weather and climatic events.
                          This chart is much more accurate that the fakery of Mann's chart.

                          Learn to read what is written.

                          _____
                          The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                          ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by eider View Post
                            After a three-day blow from the North to North-East all the flotsam, dinghies, drifting craft, netting and other debris comes up on our beaches. but very few dead birds by comparison with North American statistics. I guess it all depends on where the wind turbines are? However if your stats are reason enough to hold wind power in a dark light, just take a look at how birds get killed by other means:- This from Google:-

                            Wind turbines kill between 214,000 and 368,000 birds annually — a small fraction compared with the estimated 6.8 million fatalities from collisions with cell and radio towers and the 1.4 billion to 3.7 billion deaths from cats, according to the peer-reviewed study by two federal scientists and the environmental ...15 Sep 2014
                            How many wind turbines does it take to kill 100,000 birds?
                            How many cell and radio towers does it take to kill 100,000 birds?
                            How many cats does it take to kill 100,000 birds?

                            I need ratios, not absolutes taken out of context.
                            Learn to read what is written.

                            _____
                            The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                            ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Alate_One View Post
                              You deny that CO2 is increasing in the atmosphere?
                              History shows that a rise in CO2 follows a rise in temperature.
                              Global Warming hoax claims that CO2 is causing the rise in temperature that precedes the rise in CO2.
                              Learn to read what is written.

                              _____
                              The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                              ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by User Name View Post
                                Neonics are much more of a problem for birds: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/e..._Yzl44nq2TgvgQ
                                Monsanto is responsible for a lot of deaths.
                                Learn to read what is written.

                                _____
                                The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                                ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X