Mueller turns up the heat on impeachment
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
Here's more on the corrupt Muler. He's been tied in with so many scandals he probably wears a scandal sheet as his nightgown.
http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/05/robert-mueller-the-old-fixer-is-back-in-town/
http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/05/robert-mueller-the-old-fixer-is-back-in-town/
It demonstrates courage and devotion to duty outside of the rhetorical.
A declaration isn't a demonstration. It's a stump speech.
Another thing you're making up then.
Looks like reason isn't your strong suit, though you're demonstrably aces at throwing stones.
At least your proffering something to consider now.
An allegation by Alan Dershowitz? And what action was taken and sustained against Muller in a court of law?
That's just more allegation on the same story about Whitey. This time we have accusations from Louie Gohmert.
Louie Gohmert, who is essentially a wind sock for the far right with a propensity to believe and speak some curious notions. Here are a few nuggets by former birther believing Representative Gohmert:
On the Court.
On guns control and gay marriage.
On homosexuals in the military.
On terrorism and immigration...
So, he has a history of saying all sorts of things.
Echoes on literally the same (and so far only) charge against Muller. One that, to my knowledge, was never taken seriously enough by anyone for it to see the inside of any courtroom.
That's it?
lain:It demonstrates courage and devotion to duty outside of the rhetorical.
A declaration isn't a demonstration. It's a stump speech.
Another thing you're making up then.
Looks like reason isn't your strong suit, though you're demonstrably aces at throwing stones.
At least your proffering something to consider now.
An allegation by Alan Dershowitz? And what action was taken and sustained against Muller in a court of law?
That's just more allegation on the same story about Whitey. This time we have accusations from Louie Gohmert.
Louie Gohmert, who is essentially a wind sock for the far right with a propensity to believe and speak some curious notions. Here are a few nuggets by former birther believing Representative Gohmert:
On the Court.
On guns control and gay marriage.
[/FONT][/COLOR]On homosexuals in the military.
On terrorism and immigration...
So, he has a history of saying all sorts of things.
Echoes on literally the same (and so far only) charge against Muller. One that, to my knowledge, was never taken seriously enough by anyone for it to see the inside of any courtroom.
That's it?
So, these guys were showing their sterling qualities of character too? https://listverse.com/2017/07/04/10-infamous-killers-who-were-decorated-servants-of-uncle-sam/ They were decorated vets too.... And the mafia worked very closely with the army on operation husky. In fact the invasion of Italy would most likely have failed without their help. Does that show great character and honesty?
You can be awarded a purple heart for a wound that can be treated with a band aid. It is no reliable identifier of courage or bravery like the Silver or Bronze stars, or the Medal of Honor are. Anyone who is awarded one of those medals is courageous. A purple heart? meh. It's basically meaningless as regards to any qualities of character. All you have to do to "earn" it is be injured. That doesn't mean much. You can get shot running from a battle and still be awarded a purple heart because you were injured. That doesn't mean all recipients of it are bad guys, it just means it's an unreliable indicator of good character.
I have to laugh at your Louie Gohmert quotes. That you think they prove anything is hilarious as far as I'm concerned. That you don't understand the implications of homosexuality and all the transgender baloney as to their negative impacts on society doesn't say much for your reasoning capacity or your understanding of human nature. You swallow the political arguments hook, line, and sinker coming from those out to destroy the US. You have been led around by the nose and consider yourself a deep thinker. It doesn't get much sadder than that.
As to your assertion that Muler must be a good guy because he hasn't been prosecuted, it makes me laugh. The most successful criminals don't get prosecuted for a variety of reasons like having political connections, using blackmail on cops and judges, etc.... The Clintons have a string of around 50 bodies behind them and they haven't been indicted yet. Bill had his own medical examiner in Arkansas who would make determinations such as death from cancer when the subject's head was missing, or two teenages committed suicide and then wrapped themselves up in a tarp and laid themselves on the railroad tracks afterwards. Or how about the right handed guy who committed suicide by shooting himself behind his left ear. Or the guy who committed suicide by shooting himself 6 or 7 times in the chest. It's ironic just how painful it is to be a Clinton associate when people went to those extremes just to get away from them. I can give you many examples just like the ones I've mentioned here, and yet Bill and Hillary have never been indicted. Or, how about Hillary turning $1000 into $100,000 in a years time by making "investments"? Or how about their Whitewater investments where Clinton used state funds, equipment, and employees to build roads into his personal property to increase its value? These are matters of historical fact, as is the fact that old Billy Bob used Arkansas State troopers to take him to extramarital trysts. Yeah, not getting indicted is such a reliable indicator of being a real good guy....
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I remember being in an online discussion (not here) with a far, far rightist who said he would spit on a current member of the armed forces who had publicly spoken out in favor of reasonable gun control in the wake of the Stoneman Douglas school shooting.
I was hoping for more from Mueller, but I'm not going to turn on him because I do believe he was, the entire way, trying to fulfill his duty to country as he has in many other ways in his lifetime. I'm counting on the House now, but I'm not holding my breath.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
From Kristin Phillips on Twitter:
The Justice Department has released transcript of a voicemail from Trump's lawyer [John Dowd] to Flynn's attorney [Rob Kelner] that, as Flynn told Mueller's prosecutors, "could have affected his willingness to cooperate and the completeness of that cooperation."
The Justice Department has released transcript of a voicemail from Trump's lawyer [John Dowd] to Flynn's attorney [Rob Kelner] that, as Flynn told Mueller's prosecutors, "could have affected his willingness to cooperate and the completeness of that cooperation."
The argument isn't that in the face of contrary evidence we should override our intellect and think the best. The argument is that the evidence at hand speaks to courage and devotion to duty, with nothing (unlike your link) to speak against it.
Name the recipients of that award who qualify by that distinction. Or did you just make it up to sully a thing and then, indirectly, a former soldier of the United States? Here's what I know about the purple heart: it's a combat decoration. If you understand what that means you'll stop what you're doing and shake head at yourself.
In combat.
You should walk into your local VFW and let them know.
In the absence of contrary evidence it is evidence of character, of courage, of fidelity, no matter how often you spit on the medal.
Everyone should. . . Well, except for the people in his district.
Then people should laugh at your concern.
That you speak to a thing without any real understanding of what you're talking about says you're consistent in your methodology.
Here come a few more examples:
Supra.
Supra.
We can at least agree on that point, if not as you mean it.
You have a bad memory to boot, because that's not what I said. I've said that your attacks are unsubstantiated horsefeathers, that the actions you're willing to believe in are the sort that end in a courtroom. You're so far from rational when it comes to him you've resisted the proper spelling of his name...that's...brother...
You laugh a lot for someone who doesn't come across as particularly happy.
lain:Neither do unicorns.
Ah, you're that far down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole then. It explains a lot. You're a deep state guy. . . do you believe in flat earth too? I'm wondering how many of those are on your bulletin board.
Translation: you've bought into a politically motivated fantasy that no sane prosecutor has advanced, that people who would benefit greatly by its successful prosecution, who are empowered to move the matter, have instead given the old hoo-ha.
Good luck with that. :e4e:
Last edited:
I have been saying that for years here, and I have been correct, as are you
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Conservatives have really taken Alinksy's Rules for Radicals and made them their own. It's fascinating to watch.
SLAM DUNK. And add this, it says "And we have buffoon and a fool who started this thread who prefers the former and wants to impeach the latter", I would add, impeach him for what!! He has committed no high crimes and misdemeanors. So impeach him for what. Just gonna'make up more lies to impeach him? This sick hate from the freak Left is destroying this country
True. :cheers:
Nunes on the origins of the Russia probe, says 'the gig is up' for the Dems
FLASHBACK: MUELLER HAS LIED BEFORE, JUST ASK HIM ABOUT WMD’S
https://newrightnetwork.com/2018/12/mueller-has-lied-before-wmd.html/
I think the best thing that can happen is if more and more people get a look at exactly what Muller found and how the principles conducted their business.From Kristin Phillips on Twitter:
The Justice Department has released transcript of a voicemail from Trump's lawyer [John Dowd] to Flynn's attorney [Rob Kelner] that, as Flynn told Mueller's prosecutors, "could have affected his willingness to cooperate and the completeness of that cooperation."
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
The problem is that not only does his base not care, neither does the GOP. That's what we've come to. Power overcame principle.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Former White House staffers Hope Hicks and Annie Donaldson have been instructed by the White House not to comply with the House Judiciary Committee’s subpoenas to turn over documents related to their time in President Donald Trump’s administration.
But former White House communications director Hope Hicks says she will still hand over documents related to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, according to the House Judiciary Committee.
Donaldson was former White House counsel Don McGahn’s chief of staff. Her notes are heavily cited in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report.
Donaldson was former White House counsel Don McGahn’s chief of staff. Her notes are heavily cited in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
House votes to enforce Barr and McGahn subpoenas
The vote keeps Democrats squarely on a meticulous investigative track favored by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other top leaders — and away from the formal impeachment inquiry that some 60 rank-and-file Democrats and several 2020 presidential candidates have been seeking.
Still, the House vote reflects the frustration among Democrats with Trump’s unwillingness to cooperate with congressional investigators who argue they have a constitutional right to examine the executive branch.
“This is a dark time. This Congress is being tested — in this case, not by a foreign adversary, but by our own president,” said House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), adding that Trump’s blanket policy of not complying with congressional subpoenas makes “Richard Nixon look like an Eagle Scout.”
In fact, shortly before the House vote, a new clash erupted between the administration and Congress. Barr said he will ask Trump to assert executive privilege to shield documents on the administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census if the House Oversight Committee moved ahead Wednesday on holding Barr in contempt.
The vote keeps Democrats squarely on a meticulous investigative track favored by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other top leaders — and away from the formal impeachment inquiry that some 60 rank-and-file Democrats and several 2020 presidential candidates have been seeking.
Still, the House vote reflects the frustration among Democrats with Trump’s unwillingness to cooperate with congressional investigators who argue they have a constitutional right to examine the executive branch.
“This is a dark time. This Congress is being tested — in this case, not by a foreign adversary, but by our own president,” said House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), adding that Trump’s blanket policy of not complying with congressional subpoenas makes “Richard Nixon look like an Eagle Scout.”
In fact, shortly before the House vote, a new clash erupted between the administration and Congress. Barr said he will ask Trump to assert executive privilege to shield documents on the administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census if the House Oversight Committee moved ahead Wednesday on holding Barr in contempt.
