Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scientists Question Darwinism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Scientists Question Darwinism

    “I think more scientists are realizing the limitations to Darwinism, specifically in regard to the origin of life and the complexity of the cell. So much of how cells actually work reveal how impossible it is that life arose from mutation and natural selection. As we have learned more and more about molecular and cellular biology, more scientists doubt Darwinism although they may not admit it for fear of repercussions.”

    The theory of Charles Darwin severely damaged the idea that the Bible should be understood in a literal manner in the eyes of many people but now more and more scientists are questioning Darwin's theory:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...nism-statement

  • #2
    Here's a list of modern as well as historical scientists who believe in creation: Creation Scientists
    "That man of sin must first be revealed." -- Jesus

    If you haven't tried: you've already failed. -- Aimiel

    Comment


    • #3
      Comparing lists from "Scientists who doubt Darwin"-
      https://evolutionnews.org/2006/02/ov...ts_proclaim_t/

      and "Project Steve",-
      https://ncse.com/project-steve

      - we find that about 0.3% of biologists with doctorates in biology or a related discipline don't accept evolutionary theory.

      Does this show you why the bandwagon argument is such a loser for creationists?
      This message is hidden because ...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        ... the bandwagon argument is such a loser ...


        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        ... we find that about (99.7%) of biologists with doctorates in biology or a related discipline (do) accept evolutionary theory.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
          “I think more scientists are realizing the limitations to Darwinism, specifically in regard to the origin of life and the complexity of the cell. So much of how cells actually work reveal how impossible it is that life arose from mutation and natural selection. As we have learned more and more about molecular and cellular biology, more scientists doubt Darwinism although they may not admit it for fear of repercussions.”

          The theory of Charles Darwin severely damaged the idea that the Bible should be understood in a literal manner in the eyes of many people but now more and more scientists are questioning Darwin's theory:

          https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...nism-statement
          One would have thought that the Christian Church had learned by now not to pit itself against "science," particularly when there is no need!

          If one believes in God directed creation, the mechanics (instantaneous vs evolution) and the timelines (6 days vs 4 billion years) should be of minimal theological concern!

          Whatever Darwin's deficiencies, the geological record and carbon dating are not going to lend themselves to a literal interpretation of Genesis!

          Comment


          • #6
            Dinosaur soft tissue





            --



            * "65-million" Year Old T. rex Soft Tissue: The T. rex photos above are actually old news, whereas all the latest published journal papers, through 2014, are listed chronologically, below. As for these photos though, North Carolina State University discovered this original biological tissue from a supposedly 65-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus Rex thighbone, with transparent and pliable blood vessels containing red blood cells. See these and other T. rex photos at Smithsonian Magazine and MS-NBC, and see an early Nat'l Geographic report. Famed paleontologist Jack Horner of Montana State University worked the excavation site. In a 2011 development, ten leading universities and institutes including Harvard, the University of Manchester, and the University of Pennsylvania published in PLoS One, a peer-reviewed journal, that they had verified that presumed dinosaur material is indeed original biological tissue from a dinosaur! Creationists refer to dinosaurs as missionary lizards for many reasons including:
            - the short-lived Carbon 14 everywhere including in dinosaur bones
            - the 521-year half-life of DNA that helps date the actual age of fossils containing dinosaurian genetic material, and
            - the mostly left-handed amino acids that should be equally right and left-handed if they were "Jurassic", and
            - the research on Egyptian mummies that established 10,000 years as an upper limit for how long original biological molecules could survive. Interestingly, the renowned evolutionist PZ Myers ridiculed our Real Science Radio program by repeating what had been a widely-discredited secular hope that the "soft-tissue" dinosaur finds were "biofilm" contamination from bacteria. But as 60 Minutes shows and Bob Enyart sums it up, "This is dinosaur."

            Comment


            • #7
              They have even rationalized that the T.Rex is not a bird?! Its teeth are birds teeth like a chicken barely has!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by jgarden View Post
                Whatever Darwin's deficiencies, the geological record and carbon dating are not going to lend themselves to a literal interpretation of Genesis!
                The subject under discussion concerns whether people were evolved or whether they were created by God.

                What say you?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well, we know that taxonomically, biologically, and genetically Humans are part of the family Hominidae, we are Great Apes. If Humans are a unique creation separate from that family then one or more of those links should not exist, particularly the genetic link.
                  "Repubs must not allow [The President] to subvert the Constitution of the US for his own benefit & because he is unable to negotiate w/ Congress," Donald Trump

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Kit the Coyote View Post
                    Well, we know that taxonomically, biologically, and genetically Humans are part of the family Hominidae, we are Great Apes. If Humans are a unique creation separate from that family then one or more of those links should not exist, particularly the genetic link.
                    I think that many scientists today are also questioning whether or not the family Hominide came about from mutation and natural selection:

                    “I think more scientists are realizing the limitations to Darwinism, specifically in regard to the origin of life and the complexity of the cell. So much of how cells actually work reveal how impossible it is that life arose from mutation and natural selection. As we have learned more and more about molecular and cellular biology, more scientists doubt Darwinism although they may not admit it for fear of repercussions.”

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by jgarden View Post
                      ...

                      Whatever Darwin's deficiencies, the geological record and carbon dating are not going to lend themselves to a literal interpretation of Genesis!
                      Exactly. People get bogged down in the mechanism of evolution, and where life came from. But the plain facts are that the living creatures
                      of today are not the same as those of millions of years ago.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Aimiel View Post
                        Here's a list of modern as well as historical scientists who believe in creation: Creation Scientists
                        Considering that almost all great men of science and learning throughout history have been men of faith, I would say that list should be quite long.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
                          I think that many scientists today are also questioning whether or not the family Hominide came about from mutation and natural selection:

                          “I think more scientists are realizing the limitations to Darwinism, specifically in regard to the origin of life and the complexity of the cell. So much of how cells actually work reveal how impossible it is that life arose from mutation and natural selection. As we have learned more and more about molecular and cellular biology, more scientists doubt Darwinism although they may not admit it for fear of repercussions.”
                          An interesting quote as it is technically correct and yet does not say what you imply it does. Life did not arise from mutation and natural selection, those came afterward.
                          "Repubs must not allow [The President] to subvert the Constitution of the US for his own benefit & because he is unable to negotiate w/ Congress," Donald Trump

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
                            Does this show you why the bandwagon argument is such a loser for creationists?
                            Why would anyone in their right mind want to believe the consensus of experts? It's much better to wing it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by way 2 go View Post
                              Does it taste like chicken?
                              Learn to read what is written.

                              _____
                              The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                              ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X