Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scientists Question Darwinism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
    The meltdown continues.
    dinosaurs are real horror show! I like King Kong beating up tyrannosaurus.
    So, what?

    believe it!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Ktoyou View Post
      dinosaurs are real horror show! I like King Kong beating up tyrannosaurus.
      I always liked Godzilla whipping up on Rodan and Ghidora. I like eating at Teriyaki Madness, because they play Japanese monster films all day.

      I discovered that the guy who played Godzilla was a well-regarded actor, who took his career seriously. He often visited zoos, observing large reptiles to improve his performance as Godzilla. Haruo Nakajima has an asteroid named after him.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haruo_Nakajima
      This message is hidden because ...

      Comment


      • Here is The Barbarian lying:
        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        (Barbarian points out that he doesn't say birds are dinosaurs)
        Here is The Barbarian saying that birds are dinosaurs:

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        In the same sense that you are a therapsid reptile, birds are dinosaurs.
        Here is The Barbarian saying, again, that birds are dinosaurs:

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        Remember, "Birds are dinosaurs in the same sense that humans are reptiles."
        Now, you wrote:
        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        So you're telling me that you're a therapsid reptile?
        To whom (if anyone) are you talking, here? To whom (if anyone) are you referring by the pronoun, 'you'? As anyone can see, your post, #494, was not a Reply to any TOL poster, in particular. Maybe you're talking to yourself. (After all, you're obviously fond of often talking about yourself in the third person, like a weirdo. Perhaps you also enjoy talking to yourself in the second person.)

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        So you're telling me that you're a therapsid reptile?
        If you are talking to me, the answer to your question is, obviously, No. I'm a human being. Only an abject idiot could call a human being a reptile. What keeps me from calling myself a reptile? Easy answer: I'm not an abject idiot. Notice how I've never, once, called myself a reptile; that is why you have, obviously, not been able to quote me as having done so. And yet, I can, and do, quote you as having affirmed that "birds are dinosaurs". Why am I able to do that? Simple: Because you have affirmed, repeatedly, on TOL, that "birds are dinosaurs".

        You, though--you are calling me a reptile:

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        You are a therapsid reptile in exactly the sense that birds are dinosaurs.
        When you say to a human, "You are a therapsid reptile", do you mean "You are a therapsid reptile", or, instead, do you mean, "You are NOT a therapsid reptile"?

        I expressly denied that I am a reptile:

        Originally posted by 7djengo7 View Post
        In no sense, whatsoever, am I a reptile of any sort, seeing as I'm a human being.
        To my denial of your claim, you (instead of agreeing with me, and saying something such as, "You're correct, 7djengo7: you are, in no sense, whatsoever, a reptile, since you are a human being") reacted by merely reiterating your idiotic claim:

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        You are a therapsid reptile in exactly the sense that birds are dinosaurs.
        Note, also: Since, curiously, you have not once, called yourself, personally, a reptile, but have, repeatedly, singled me out, calling me a reptile, you have, thereby, made yourself out to be a hypocrite when you, earlier, accused me of name-calling. That's what you're doing, and you know it: name-calling. Henceforth, I request that you stop calling me a reptile. Believe you me, I'll have no qualm, whatsoever, pointing out your very specific, malicious name-calling to the TOL moderators.

        Only an abject idiot could say that humans are reptiles! Wouldn't you agree?

        Now, do you, The Barbarian, say that humans are reptiles?

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        Remember, "Birds are dinosaurs in the same sense that humans are reptiles."
        Yeah, you do say that. Thanks.

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        That would be extraordinary,
        Bravo! You just called your claim that humans are reptiles "extraordinary"! You hit the nail on the head with that judgment! For, not only are you claiming a falsehood when you claim that humans are reptiles, but you are, in so claiming, claiming something that is extraordinarily idiotic to claim.

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        since they ["therapsid reptiles"] are thought to have died out over a hundred million years ago, and they are generally regarded to have been illiterate.
        Since you say that humans are "therapsid reptiles", here, you are saying that humans "are thought to have died out over a hundred million years ago, and they are generally regarded to have been illiterate". What an extraordinarily idiotic thing for you to claim.

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        You have some evidence for your claim?
        By "you", here, are you referring to yourself--The Barbarian--in the second person? If, instead, you're addressing me, here, then tell me what claim you're referring to by your phrase, "your claim". You, of course, are going to need to directly quote my exact words, wherein you pretend I have claimed whatever it is you are calling "your claim". See, I can, and do, quote your own words, wherein you have claimed idiotic things such as that "birds are dinosaurs" and that "humans are reptiles". You're the claim-maker, here, by calling me a reptile.

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        For the non-trolls,
        So noble and magnanimous of you, to be honest enough to distinguish yourself from us non-trolls, and to condescend to try to lay out your "science" in a cloud of vacuous jargon that, perhaps, us non-trolls could one day hope to be able to meaninglessly parrot as prolifically as you, yourself, as a Darwin cheerleader, meaninglessly parrot it.

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        taxonomy recognizes ancestry,
        To whom are you referring by the word "taxonomy"? See, I, for one, never thought that taxonomy is a person; that being the case, I, for one, never thought that taxonomy recognizes, or can recognize, anything. People--persons--recognize things; non-persons do not have cognitive capabilities; non-persons do not recognize anything. So, would you say that taxonomy is a person?

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        but considers birds to be a separate taxon from dinosaurs.
        So, when you, and Disney's Nat Geo, claim that (and I quote) "birds are dinosaurs", you do not mean to say that birds are dinosaurs, but, instead, you mean to say "birds [are] a separate taxon from dinosaurs"??

        Also, as is the case for every, last Darwin cheerleader, unfortunately for you, when you say (for instance) "taxon", you are meaninglessly parroting a word which you have absolutely zero hope of coherently explaining. (Perhaps we'll have the opportunity to flesh out this fact in further posts.) Just as is the case when you pompously flap on, and on, and on, with words like "species", "evolution" and others: you are merely meaninglessly parroting such words.

        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
        I remain skeptical of 7djengo7's claim that he is a therapsid reptile
        Again, try to directly quote my exact words, wherein you pretend I claimed that. Why can't you? That's right: because you're lying about me, as I've never--not even once--claimed that, nor anything that even remotely resembles it. Yet, you, on the other hand, have claimed that, and I've already quoted your exact words, wherein you've claimed that. So, here, you're admitting that you "remain skeptical" of your own claim! And, of course, that's an idiotic thing to do. Since you, yourself, admit that you "remain skeptical" of your own claim, I have a hunch that nobody else is bound to take your claim--your abjectly idiotic claim--seriously, either.
        All my ancestors are human.
        PS: All your ancestors are human.
        PPS: To all you cats, dogs, monkeys, and other assorted house pets whose masters are outsourcing the task of TOL post-writing to you (we know who you are )– you may disregard the PS.

        Comment


        • I wrote that birds are dinosaurs in the same sense that you are a therapsid reptile. You then affirmed that meant that birds are dinosaurs. Which is your claim that you are a therapsid reptile.

          You aren't smart enough to pull off what you're trying to do here. But since you're now reduced to trolling, you go into the troll file. Bye-bye.
          This message is hidden because ...

          Comment


          • Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
            I wrote that birds are dinosaurs in the same sense that you are a therapsid reptile. You then affirmed that meant that birds are dinosaurs.
            When you say that I "affirmed that meant that birds are dinosaurs", what is the referent of your pronoun "that"?

            I never even once affirmed that what you wrote ("birds are dinosaurs in the same sense that you are a therapsid reptile") means that birds are dinosaurs. Not at all.

            What I have been affirming, rather, is the fact that your claiming that "birds are dinosaurs" means that you are claiming that birds are dinosaurs. The fact that you also wrote the words, "in the same sense that you are a therapsid reptile", doesn't, somehow, magically cancel out the fact that you are claiming that birds are dinosaurs.

            I've invited you, numerous times, to come out and affirm, flat out, which of these two mutually contradictory propositions is the true one, and which is the false one:
            1. birds are dinosaurs
            2. birds are not dinosaurs


            So far, you have persistently stonewalled against this question, because to answer it must needs embarrass you. But, you embarrass yourself equally by stonewalling against it, too. I would actually give you a bit of credit, and probably actually "Thank" a post of yours, were you to write a post in which you clearly, without equivocation, came out and confessed the truth that BIRDS ARE NOT DINOSAURS.

            You could simply write, "Birds are not dinosaurs!" Or, "Birds are not dinosaurs in any sense, whatsoever!"

            However, were you to confess the TRUTH, that BIRDS ARE NOT DINOSAURS, you know as well as I know, that you will be directly contradicting what Disney's Nat Geo (one of the big-name organs of "science") has affirmed. And, of course, who are you? You, of course, don't want to be seen as out of step with your masters from mainstream "science".

            Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
            Which is your claim that you are a therapsid reptile.
            Again, I've never made any such claim: that's why you can't quote me as having made such a claim.

            Your phrase, "your claim that you are a therapsid reptile" is without a referent--meaningless--since I have never claimed to be a reptile.

            Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
            You aren't smart enough to pull off what you're trying to do here.
            Already pulled it off with my first post. I forced you to have to lie, stonewall, and dodge, to try (and fail) to save face for the stupidities you are proud, as a Darwin cheerleader, to parrot.

            Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
            But since you're now reduced to trolling, you go into the troll file. Bye-bye.
            Feel free to cower and run away! I, for my part, have no plan to go anywhere. By all means, put me on ignore; I can continue to read your posts, and I can continue to pit your ravings as a Darwin cheerleader against your ravings as a Darwin cheerleader.
            All my ancestors are human.
            PS: All your ancestors are human.
            PPS: To all you cats, dogs, monkeys, and other assorted house pets whose masters are outsourcing the task of TOL post-writing to you (we know who you are )– you may disregard the PS.

            Comment


            • Gee, that improved things things hereabouts.
              This message is hidden because ...

              Comment


              • Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
                Gee, that improved things things hereabouts.
                You're doing ignore wrong.
                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                E≈mc2
                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                -Bob B.

                Comment


                • I like the version of ignore where barbie turns red for a year and we all forget he ever posted here

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ok doser View Post
                    I like the version of ignore where barbie turns red for a year and we all forget he ever posted here
                    It's your fault he keeps coming back. You make him so enraged that he has an eternal drive to prove you wrong just once.
                    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                    E≈mc2
                    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                    -Bob B.

                    Comment


                    • It's crowded under the bridge today.
                      This message is hidden because ...

                      Comment


                      • This message is hidden because ...

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
                          It's crowded under the bridge today.
                          Well then, get out from under the bridge.
                          All of my ancestors are human.
                          Originally posted by Squeaky
                          That explains why your an idiot.
                          Originally posted by God's Truth
                          Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
                          Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
                          (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

                          1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
                          (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

                          Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by genuineoriginal View Post
                            Does it taste like chicken?
                            It should taste like heme-saturated collagen. That's what it is. "Tissue"is a group of cells organized for some function. These bits of organic compounds aren't even cells. But it's interesting that some organic molecules, stabilized by iron, can persist for millions of years.

                            It was actually invert paleontologists who first noticed this, many years ago.
                            This message is hidden because ...

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
                              It's interesting that some organic molecules, stabilized by iron, can persist for millions of years.


                              Darwinists believe in magic.

                              Describe a situation in which a body could be soaked in iron for even one year.
                              Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                              E≈mc2
                              "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                              "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                              -Bob B.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Stripe View Post


                                Darwinists believe in magic.

                                Describe a situation in which a body could be soaked in iron for even one year.
                                "I cannot self terminate - you must lower me into the steel"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X