Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump impeachment

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trump impeachment

    If you believe Donald Trump is not qualified to be president because he is an adulterous liar, I do agree. If you believe being an adulterous liar does not disqualify a President, but paying his bimbo to hide his adultery (with money that did not come from campaign funds) is a crime that justifies his removal from office,you are just being silly.

  • #2
    Who is Donaldtrump?

    Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

    Comment


    • #3
      You're fired!


      How you doing Stripe?

      Comment


      • #4
        Delmar!!! Didn't recognize you for a minute there. I'm doing well. Getting ready to take the little one to church.

        Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
        E≈mc2
        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
        -Bob B.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Delmar View Post
          If you believe Donald Trump is not qualified to be president because he is an adulterous liar, I do agree. If you believe being an adulterous liar does not disqualify a President, but paying his bimbo to hide his adultery (with money that did not come from campaign funds) is a crime that justifies his removal from office,you are just being silly.
          Any money spent by a candidate or a campaign to effect the outcome of the election has to be reported. You or I can spend money to inuence the outcome of an election as long as we don't coordinate with the campaign about it, but the candidate cannot.

          The telling thing here is the fact that if this has been done officially through the campaign, it would probably have been legal. Candidates are allowed to donate as much of their own money to their campaigns as they want. All he would have had to do is make a donation to his campaign in his own name, and the law wouldn't have cared. But then, campaigns have reporting obligations.

          It is the secrecy that is the problem. Americans have a right to know some basic details about that candidates bidding to represent them.
          Global warming denialists are like gravity denialists piloting a helicopter, determined to prove a point. We may not have time to actually persuade them of their mistake.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by rexlunae View Post
            Americans have a right to know some basic details about that candidates bidding to represent them.


            You didn't know enough about Trump already?

            Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
            Where is the evidence for a global flood?
            E≈mc2
            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
            -Bob B.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Stripe View Post


              You didn't know enough about Trump already?

              Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
              Oh, I've known plenty about him forever, to make up my own mind. But you know perfectly we'll what would have happened if Hillary Clinton had deliberately violated campaign finance law to hide secrets.
              Global warming denialists are like gravity denialists piloting a helicopter, determined to prove a point. We may not have time to actually persuade them of their mistake.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rexlunae View Post
                Americans have a right to know some basic details about that candidates bidding to represent them.
                can you point to anything in the constitution that enumerates a citizen's right to know about a candidate's sexual habits?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ok doser View Post
                  can you point to anything in the constitution that enumerates a citizen's right to know about a candidate's sexual habits?
                  I didn't suggest there was such a provision in the Constitution, as you well know.
                  Global warming denialists are like gravity denialists piloting a helicopter, determined to prove a point. We may not have time to actually persuade them of their mistake.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    ok, so where does this "right" come from?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by ok doser View Post
                      ok, so where does this "right" come from?
                      the 28th amendment.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        of course

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by rexlunae View Post
                          Any money spent by a candidate or a campaign to effect the outcome of the election has to be reported. You or I can spend money to inuence the outcome of an election as long as we don't coordinate with the campaign about it, but the candidate cannot.

                          The telling thing here is the fact that if this has been done officially through the campaign, it would probably have been legal. Candidates are allowed to donate as much of their own money to their campaigns as they want. All he would have had to do is make a donation to his campaign in his own name, and the law wouldn't have cared. But then, campaigns have reporting obligations.

                          It is the secrecy that is the problem. Americans have a right to know some basic details about that candidates bidding to represent them.
                          When Trump was elected, it was a well known fact that he had a checkered past. His paying off a stripper was not against the law, nor was it a campaign expense. Nice try, though.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by rexlunae View Post
                            Oh, I've known plenty about him forever, to make up my own mind. But you know perfectly we'll what would have happened if Hillary Clinton had deliberately violated campaign finance law to hide secrets.
                            She did, and so did Obama.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by rexlunae View Post
                              Any money spent by a candidate or a campaign to effect the outcome of the election has to be reported.
                              did hillary report the money spent for breakfast the day of the second debate?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X