Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Dr. Paul Church now expelled from four Boston area hospitals – over comments to colleagues at one hospital about its promotion of unhealthy, high-risk LGBT lifestyle

awww did the lying bigot loose his job?

Yes, it's come to the point in our insane asylum of a nation where a doctor of medicine can't even say:

"This body part NEVER goes there, and when it does, terrible things happen."

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Add this latest case to

300 Examples You Have to Read to Understand the Term ‘Homofascism’
http://barbwire.com/2014/07/07/300-examples-read-understand-meant-term-homofascism/

I remember when you first put this out. the claims could eiher not be verrified or it turns out they were total lies.

I must have missed where you had shown that any one of those 300 examples were "lies".

Also note that each 'example' has a linked attached, in fact some of those stories come from some of your favorite rainbow flag-waving websites and periodicals:

towerload.com
sfgate.com
thestranger.com

etc. etc. etc.

BTW: What must Donald Trump do to convince all LGBTQ flag wavers (democrats and Libertarians who crossed Party lines to get him elected, and those who were loyal to the pro abortion/pro LGBTQ Democratic Party) that he's one of them?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I would like to take this opportunity to thank registered democrat glassjester for showing something that I've been saying since early on in the recent Presidential primaries:

It was democrats and Libertarians who crossed Party lines who were largely responsible for Donald Trump's victory, and because of Trump's loyalties to the LGBTQ movement, they will continue to support him.

That being said: Let's do a little exercise called

"What if?"

"What if" Donald Trump had run as a democrat and at the Democratic National Convention instead of having proud and unrepentant homosexual/activist Peter Thiel speak, he had Peter LaBarbera of American's For Truth About Homosexuality talk about the health hazards of homosexuality.

Do you think LaBarbera would have received a standing ovation from the democrats?

"What if" 2 days before the Presidential election, democrat nominee Donald Trump while at a rally in Greeley CO instead of proudly holding the LGBTQ flag of death up for display, held this sign up in front of his fellow democrats:

http://cdn.knowing-jesus.com/wp-con...t-Have-Sex-Relations-With-A-Male-red-copy.jpg

"What if" shortly after being sworn in as President as a democrat, Donald Trump went back on his campaign promises and stated that "Obergefell v Hodges in NOT settled law and I will do everything in my power to have it overturned".

"What if" Democrat President Donald Trump nominated a Supreme Court justice who attended a very strong pro traditional family church (unlike Neil Gorsuch who attends a LGBTQ flag waving church) and during his SCOTUS confirmation hearing stated " No Senator, Roe v Wade and Obergefell v Hodges are NOT the laws of the land, and I will do everything in my power to have them overturned!"

Do you think democrats would have sat idly back and supported Trump during the primaries as well as continued to support Donald Trump during his Presidency?

Of course not.

The question is: Why are republicans?

 

[patrick jane]

I would like to take this opportunity to thank registered democrat glassjester for showing something that I've been saying since early on in the recent Presidential primaries:

It was democrats and Libertarians who crossed Party lines who were largely responsible for Donald Trump's victory, and because of Trump's loyalties to the LGBTQ movement, they will continue to support him.

That being said: Let's do a little exercise called

"What if?"

"What if" Donald Trump had run as a democrat and at the Democratic National Convention instead of having proud and unrepentant homosexual/activist Peter Thiel speak, he had Peter LaBarbera of American's For Truth About Homosexuality talk about the health hazards of homosexuality.

Do you think LaBarbera would have received a standing ovation from the democrats?

"What if" 2 days before the Presidential election, democrat nominee Donald Trump while at a rally in Greeley CO instead of proudly holding the LGBTQ flag of death up for display, held this sign up in front of his fellow democrats:

http://cdn.knowing-jesus.com/wp-con...t-Have-Sex-Relations-With-A-Male-red-copy.jpg

"What if" shortly after being sworn in as President as a democrat, Donald Trump went back on his campaign promises and stated that "Obergefell v Hodges in NOT settled law and I will do everything in my power to have it overturned".

"What if" Democrat President Donald Trump nominated a Supreme Court justice who attended a very strong pro traditional family church (unlike Neil Gorsuch who attends a LGBTQ flag waving church) and during his SCOTUS confirmation hearing stated " No Senator, Roe v Wade and Obergefell v Hodges are NOT the laws of the land, and I will do everything in my power to have them overturned!"

Do you think democrats would have sat idly back and supported Trump during the primaries as well as continued to support Donald Trump during his Presidency?

Of course not.

The question is: Why are republicans?

It's Trump's party now

 

[aCultureWarrior]

It's Trump's party now

Donald Trump throws a great LGBTQ party doesn't he?

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1600054565/PARTY_LGBT_LOGOANYBKGRD_WEB.png

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Next up: How Donald Trump relies on the Federalist Society for his judicial picks, and the background of the Federalist Society.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

http://newsroom.unl.edu/announce/files/file36649.jpg


For pages 141-160

In these 20 pages, readers will see what insanity the "T" of the LGBTQ acronym has brought to westernized supposed civilization by allowing gender confused people (and sexual predators pretending to be of the opposite gender) into places where women and girls expect privacy.

Donald Trump's stance on the "T" in the LGBTQ acronym during the Presidential primaries is shown, which hasn't changed since he took the Office of POTUS.

There are several scenarios that I'd presented to one of TOL's avid defenders of homosexuality and the LGBTQ agenda, feel free to use those scenarios when you're debating LGBTQ'ers on the internet or out in public to show that they too put homosexuality before the physical, psychological and spiritual health of children.

*To prove a point, aCW* presents a LGBTQ activist* with a scenario dealing with questions that children might ask an adult;* page 141, post #2115
*http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4658383&viewfull=1#post4658383
*
Violence among homosexuals (sexually abused boys grow up and their frustration often times turns to violence); page 142, post #2116
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4658403&viewfull=1#post4658403
*
12 Ways Homosexual Adults Endanger Children* (another scenario presented to a LGBTQ activist) ; page 142, post #2127
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4658760&viewfull=1#post4658760
*
Another scenario*:* A drag queen walks into a restroom and is alone with a frightened little girl; page 143, post #2131/32
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4659671&viewfull=1#post4659671
*
Yet another scenario:* Two lesbians cross dress a little boy in their custody and a little friend wants to know how to help him with his depression;
page 143, post #2141/2142
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4660987&viewfull=1#post4660987

aCW discusses organized pedophilia/child molestation with LGBTQ apologist annabenedetti (link attached); page 143, post #2143
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4661120&viewfull=1#post4661120
http://www.emaso.com/links/ref-articles/ref38e/ref38e.htm

Incest: The next frontier in reproductive freedom (link attached); page 144, post #2146
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4661140&viewfull=1#post4661140
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/incest-the-next-frontier-in-reproductive-freedom/
*
Two of TOL's LGBTQ activists team up and ask aCW about marriage and parental consent; aCW replies with yet another scenario; page 146, post #2184
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4661259&viewfull=1#post4661259
*
Yet another scenario for one of TOL's LGBTQ activists; page 146, post #2186
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4661636&viewfull=1#post4661636
*
aCW shares his thoughts on teen marriage with two of TOL's LGBTQ activists; page 146, post #2189
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4661976&viewfull=1#post4661976
*
The grooming process of a child sexual predator; How pedophiles groom our children and us; page 148, post #2207
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4663683&viewfull=1#post4663683
https://www.families.com/blog/the-grooming-process-of-a-child-sexual-predator
http://www.renegadepopo.com/how-pedophiles-groom--printer-version.php
*
In "New York values thug" news: Trump Vows to Stand by Campaign Manager Charged With Battery, Says He Does Not Discard People; page 148, post #2208
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4663723&viewfull=1#post4663723
*
In homosexual 'culture news:* How homosexuals celebrate Easter Sunday (2016 Hunky Jesus Contest final video);* page 148, post #2209
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4663744&viewfull=1#post4663744
*
Donald Trump's 3 positions on abortion in 3 hours; page 148, post #2213
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4665250&viewfull=1#post4665250
*
Now that openly homosexual males are allowed into the Boy Scouts of America as Scoutmasters : Missouri Supreme Court: Boy Scouts not liable for abuse; page 148, post #2216
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4667290&viewfull=1#post4667290
*
Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion; Suicide Rate for Women Having Abortions is Six Times Higher Than Women Giving Birth; page 149, post #2227
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4668000&viewfull=1#post4668000
*
More thuggery by Donald Trump supporters; page 149, post #2234
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4671920&viewfull=1#post4671920
*
[Republican Presidential candidate] John Kasich: I would not have signed transgender restroom bill; page 151, post #2251
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4672564&viewfull=1#post4672564
*
Could Donald Trump surrogate Roger Stone be charged with ‘menacing’ GOP convention delegates?; page 151, post #252
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4672593&viewfull=1#post4672593
*
Ted Cruz:* Trump is a sniveling coward (video); page 151, post #2256
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4672603&viewfull=1#post4672603
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cPgdMGf2Pk
*
Women: Decide For Yourselves (drag queen/transgender violence, video); page 152, post #2278
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4675896&viewfull=1#post4675896
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzwMJAFWLtQ
*
Homosexuality/transgenderism and substance abuse; page 152, post #2268
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4673174&viewfull=1#post4673174
https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm
*
Potty Talk: The Tyranny of the .03 Percent (gender confused men and sexual predators legally using women's restrooms, locker rooms and fitting rooms); page 153, post #2282
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4676027&viewfull=1#post4676027
https://townhall.com/columnists/joy...y-talk-the-tyranny-of-the-03-percent-n2145407
*
Transgender fetish is the largest sexual disorder reported in convicted sex offenders (cases of*violence committed *by transgenders); page 153, post #2286
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4676135&viewfull=1#post4676135
https://outofmypantiesnow.wordpress.com/2013/10/28/when-is-90-not-substantially-all/
*
Trump voices opposition to North Carolina bathroom law; page 154, post #2309; page 156, post #2330
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4682422&viewfull=1#post4682422
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4683585&viewfull=1#post4683585
*
Ted Cruz hammers Donald Trump over comments on North Carolina's 'bathroom law'; page 155, post #2316
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4682422&viewfull=1#post4682422
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4683173&viewfull=1#post4683173
*
Sex crimes at Target (a national chain who opened their restroom doors to anyone); page 158, post #
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4683585&viewfull=1#post4683585
*
*BRAINWASHED: Kelly Ripa’s [11 year old] Son Was So Over-Exposed to Homosexuals Getting ‘Married’ that He Thought Normal, Heterosexual Marriage Might Be Illegal — She Tells GLAAD; page 160, post #2399
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4694852&viewfull=1#post4694852


Drag queen Bruce Jenner takes Donald Trump up on his offer to use the women's restroom at any Trump property (YouTube video); Obama Whitehouse has "gender neutral" restroom policy; page 160, post #2400
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4701368&viewfull=1#post4701368
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zih-U-36jU

 

[Arthur Brain]

:rotfl:

Those increasingly demented scenarios of yours were sure something else aCW...

FTR, I've never talked with or encouraged children to talk about sex of any sort outside of your fevered imagination.

You are a gay obsessed loon and need to avail yourself of the 'therapy' you so desperately prescribe for others...

:hammer:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

:rotfl:

Those increasingly demented scenarios of yours were sure something else aCW...

Real life scenarios where children ask adults questions (it wasn't easy for me to refer to you as an adult Art).

FTR, I've never talked with or encouraged children to talk about sex of any sort outside of your fevered imagination.

You represented the LGBTQ movement in showing how an adult* would respond to children's questions.

*It wasn't easy...

You are a gay obsessed loon and need to avail yourself of the 'therapy' you so desperately prescribe for others...

:hammer:

Matthew 18:6

God knows exactly what size you wear Art.

https://www.cybersalt.org/images/backpew/m/millstonediver.jpg

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I've been having discussions with avid Trump lemmings in various Trump lemming forums recently and they all seem ecstatic (you can picture the drool running down the side of their mouth) that their rainbow flag waving leader has thrown them a patronizing piece of candy called "religious liberty".

From Trump lemming headquarters, Faux News:

What Trump understands about religious liberty in America

May 4, 2017 [for Trump supporters who count on their fingers, that was over 3 months ago]

There is a war on religious liberty in America – and this war is targeting people of the Christian faith.

That's why President Trump signed an executive order on religious liberty Thursday in the Rose Garden – to protect Americans who have been targeted by a politically correct lynch mob.

The order is for people like Barronelle Stutzman – a grandmother and the owner of a Washington state flower shop. Mrs. Stutzman, a sweet and gentle woman, faces the loss of her business, her home and life savings because she refused to participate in a gay wedding.

It’s for people like the Vander Boon family of Grand Rapids, Michigan – the owners of a meat packing company. USDA inspectors ordered the Vander Boons to remove religious materials from their company’s break room

I suspect that some Christians might be puzzled by the president’s executive order – because it does not specifically mention protections for people like the Vander Boons or Mrs. Stutzman.

But fear not friends...


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017...tands-about-religious-liberty-in-america.html

But fear not friends, your rainbow flag waving President who said, and hired an Attorney General who said that Obergefell v Hodges is "settled law" (and let's not forget the SCOTUS Judge who during confirmation said that Obergefell v Hodges is definitely the "law of the land") will protect you from the LGBTQ politically correct lynch mob.

For any legal scholars out there (and no Matt Barber, your law degree from the University of Tijuana doesn't make you a legal scholar) :

How can religious freedom, i.e. the freedoms afforded to American citizens by the homophobic-slaving owning Founding Fathers as seen in the 1st Amendment override the constitutional right given to Bruce and the guy he met in a public restroom toilet stall and after a 30 second courtship they decided to mock God's institution of marriage?

https://truthnicity.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/644203.jpg

And how soon will this supposed religious freedom law go into effect?

Will Dr. Paul Church get rehired by one of the 3 hospitals that terminated his position because he told the truth about the homosexual 'deathstyle'?

 

[Arthur Brain]

Real life scenarios where children ask adults questions (it wasn't easy for me to refer to you as an adult Art).



You represented the LGBTQ movement in showing how an adult* would respond to children's questions.

*It wasn't easy...




Matthew 18:6

God knows exactly what size you wear Art.

https://www.cybersalt.org/images/backpew/m/millstonediver.jpg

Lots of things aren't easy for you doofus, apart from making a real clown of yourself...

On that note, bored now...

:e4e:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Lots of things aren't easy for you doofus, apart from making a real clown of yourself...

On that note, bored now...

:e4e:

Before you go ole child indoctrinator, surely you must know some fellow rainbow flag wavers with some background in law that can answer my above question:

How can religious freedom, i.e. the freedoms afforded to American citizens by the homophobic-slaving owning Founding Fathers as seen in the 1st Amendment override the constitutional right given to Bruce and the guy he met in a public restroom toilet stall and after a 30 second courtship they decided to mock God's institution of marriage?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

In "All talk and no action" news (i.e. what Donald the flip flopper Trump tweets doesn't mean that it's going to happen) :

[Former Obama appointee James] Mattis suggests transgender military members may continue to serve

August 14, 2017

Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis said Monday that the White House had still not provided policy guidance on transgender persons serving in the military, adding that they were still studying the issue, raising the prospect that transgender service members may be allowed to continue to serve despite President Donald Trump's July announcement of a ban via twitter.
"We are going to study the issue," Mattis told reporters at the Pentagon.
"The policy is going to address whether or not transgenders can serve under what conditions, what medical support they require, how much time would they be perhaps non-deployable leaving others to pick up their share of everything. There's a host of issues and I'm learning more about this than I ever thought I would and it's obviously very complex to include the privacy issues which we respect," Mattis said.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/14/politics/mattis-transgender-ban-military-trump/index.html

But wait, there's more!

[Recently confirmed Trump] Navy secretary on transgender troops: 'Any patriot' should be allowed to serve
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/3...troops-any-patriot-should-be-allowed-to-serve

Since Donald Trump has continued in the footsteps of his predecessor B. Hussein Obama to make the United States Military a social experiment which not only involves embracing proud and unrepentant sexual deviants, but embracing proud and unrepentant gender confused people to serve, this song is dedicated to you Donald Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmGuy0jievs

 

[Arthur Brain]

Before you go ole child indoctrinator, surely you must know some fellow rainbow flag wavers with some background in law that can answer my above question:

How can religious freedom, i.e. the freedoms afforded to American citizens by the homophobic-slaving owning Founding Fathers as seen in the 1st Amendment override the constitutional right given to Bruce and the guy he met in a public restroom toilet stall and after a 30 second courtship they decided to mock God's institution of marriage?

Hmm, well, unless extolling the benefits of regular tooth brushing counts, then I haven't "indoctrinated" a child at any point, ever, about anything...and your crack induced, loop the loop, badly written "scenarios" sure don't count.

Now, how about you get all obsessive about Wiz having 47 different accounts or something you bemusing person...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Before you go ole child indoctrinator, surely you must know some fellow rainbow flag wavers with some background in law that can answer my above question:

How can religious freedom, i.e. the freedoms afforded to American citizens by the homophobic-slaving owning Founding Fathers as seen in the 1st Amendment, override the constitutional right given to Bruce and the guy he met in a public restroom toilet stall and after a 30 second courtship they decided to mock God's institution of marriage?

Hmm, well, unless extolling the benefits of regular tooth brushing counts, then I haven't "indoctrinated" a child at any point, ever, about anything...and your crack induced, loop the loop, badly written "scenarios" sure don't count.

Hopefully these scenarios have helped some parents out there who are following this thread understand why they should never allow their children to be anywhere near a homosexual or a homosexual activist.

Now, how about you get all obsessive about Wiz having 47 different accounts or something you bemusing person...

Surely one of your many secular humanist friends must have a law degree and can answer my above question?

Here it is again:

How can religious freedom, i.e. the freedoms afforded to American citizens by the homophobic-slaving owning Founding Fathers as seen in the 1st Amendment, override the constitutional right given to Bruce and the guy he met in a public restroom toilet stall and after a 30 second courtship they decided to mock God's institution of marriage?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

It's been 3 days since my post asking anyone with a background in law to come forward and explain how religious liberty and LGBTQ (supposed) rights can coexist from a constitutional standpoint, i.e. how Donald Trump can say that Obergefell v Hodges is "settled law" yet at the same time support the freedom to speak out and act against things like homosexual (faux) 'marriage'.

Since no one has come forward, let's see how the Supreme Court Justices who dissented in the Obergefell v Hodges case felt about it.

Dissenting Obergefell Justices Sound Alarm On Religious Freedom

Kennedy's decision "ominously" downgrades religious freedom; "ruinous consequences for religious liberty."

June 29, 2015

Within moments of the Supreme Court handing down its Obergefell decision, the media and other progressives celebrated the news that Anthony Kennedy had redefined marriage to include same-sex couples. He and four other justices on the Supreme Court discovered — Kennedy struggled mightily to explain where or how, precisely — a new fundamental right to same-sex marriage. That meant, as Justice Antonin Scalia put it, that “every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification and Massachusetts’ permitting of same-sex marriages in 2003.”
Lost in the celebration was even a slight journalistic comprehension of what the Court had done, much less a critical analysis of same. There is much to be written about the effect of this Roe V. Wade-style decision that bans any further discussion of changing marriage law voluntarily. I imagine there will be much focus on the alarms sounded by the four dissenting justices about the grave threat to self-government, rule of law and the unintended consequences of redefining the pre-governmental institution that forms the basis of society. For now, let’s look at what the justices had to say about the clash between sexual liberty and religious freedom...

Kennedy [majority vote]: We’ll let you talk about your wrong religious views. Nothing more.

[Dissenting votes]

Roberts: This decision does not protect the religious.
...Unfortunately, people of faith can take no comfort in the treatment they receive from the majority today.

Scalia: Rule of law and self-government have been gravely wounded. Also, Kennedy is an idiot.

Thomas: CODE RED. I repeat, we have a religious liberty CODE RED.
Aside from undermining the political processes that protect our liberty, the majority’s decision threatens the religious liberty our Nation has long sought to protect…

Alito: With this lawless decision, government will stamp out dissent
I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools.

Read more: http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/29/dissenting-obergefell-justices-sound-alarm-on-religious-freedom/

There ya have it, in the words of SCOTUS Justices: the LGBTQ movement and Christianity cannot 'coexist'.

https://i.redd.it/yx5g4ilw16zx.gif

 

[aCultureWarrior]

'Art of the Deal' writer: Trump will resign soon

Aug. 17, 2017

A co-author of President Trump's 1987 best-selling*memoir "Art of the Deal" is predicting the president will resign from office before the end of the year.

"The circle is closing at blinding speed. Trump is going to resign and declare victory before Mueller and Congress leave him no choice," Tony Schwartz said Thursday.

"Trump must be isolated. Resistance every day. The end is near but must keep pressure high," he added.

Schwartz made a similar prediction in May when he said that Trump would resign because he was in "pure terror" over the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller into possible collusion between his presidential campaign and Russia.
"There is no right and wrong for Trump. There's winning and losing. And that's very different from right and wrong. Right now he's in pure terror that he is going to lose," Schwartz said in May.
"And by the way, he is going to lose."
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...gn-soon/ar-AAqgfdE?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

Sociopathic wannabe tyrants don't resign, they have to be forcefully removed from Office.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/fa/71/5d/fa715d5694146fe9994622f2972feb07.jpg

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Let's take a look at what group (and the group's ideology) Donald Trump uses when picking federal judges and Supreme Court Justices:

Trump Says Federalist Society Will Pick His Judges For Him

June 14, 2017

Law360, Chicago (June 14, 2016, 3:29 PM EDT) -- Donald Trump gave some insight into his judicial selection process on Monday, suggesting to a conservative news outlet that all of his judges will be selected by the conservative/libertarian Federalist Society.
“You saw the 11 names I gave,” Trump told Breitbart News Daily, referring to the list of 11 potential U.S. Supreme Court nominees he released last month. “And we're going to have great judges, conservative, all picked by Federalist Society.”

Read more: https://www.law360.com/articles/806797/trump-says-federalist-society-will-pick-his-judges-for-him

The word "libertarian" doesn't belong anywhere near the word "conservative", let alone next to each other in a sentence.

Now let's see what the "libertarian-conservative" Federalist Society stands for:

(article written by libertarian leaning journalist Eugene Volokh).

"Having joined the Federalists in 1987, two years before starting law school (I was 19 and had seen their ad in the National Review), I feel qualified to answer these questions.* The Federalist Society is a group of conservatives, libertarians and moderates who share two things: an interest in law and a sense that the liberal legal establishment often (not always) gets things wrong.

We have no articles of faith.* Some of us are pro-choice, others pro-life.* Some Federalists -- such as Gary Lawson, a member of the society’s board of directors and a professor at Northwestern University School of Law -- think the Constitution should be interpreted primarily based on its original meaning.* Others focus more on precedent or on evolving tradition.* Some, like professor Randy E.* Barnett of Boston University, argue that the Constitution protects a broad range of rights beyond those specifically listed in the first eight amendments.* Still others, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who was a faculty adviser to the University of Chicago’s chapter of the Federalist Society in the 1980s, believe that decisions about such unenumerated rights should be left to the democratic process, not to judges...

What, then, unites us?* The society does have a statement of purpose (available at http://www.fed-soc.org/who.htm) but it mentions general ideals such as individual freedom, separation of powers and the rule of law -- important principles, but ones that are understood quite differently by different people.* I would wager that most members have never read this statement, or (like me) read it once but had long forgotten it...

The society is genuinely open to a variety of views.* It takes no position on legislation or on candidates.* It files no lawsuits or friend of the court briefs.* Its charter is to create discussion, not to lobby, litigate or get out the vote.* It welcomes moderates and liberals, if they want to participate, as well as libertarians and conservatives; anyone is free to join.
This openness extends to Federalist conferences, which invariably include liberal speakers, such as Justice Stephen Breyer; Clinton administration White House counsels Abner Mikva and Bernard Nussbaum; professors Akhil Amar, Alan Dershowitz, Randy Kennedy and Kathleen Sullivan; ACLU leaders Nadine Strossen, Burt Neuborne and Steve Shapiro; and many more.* I know of no other law-school-based group that consistently sets up panels as balanced as the ones we Federalists put together."

Read more: http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/fedsoc.htm

So there you have it: Judges picked by Donald Trump, per the advice of The Federalist Society have no article of faith and can be liberal/libertarian, moderate or conservative.

http://www.fed-soc.org/library/imgLib/20150821_FedSocLogoShort1Black.jpg

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Pat Buchanan wrote a good article in Townhall about the attack on Southern heritage and culture:

America's Second Civil War
https://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2017/08/18/americas-second-civil-war-n2370179

Where Buchanan goes wrong in the article is where he asks whose side the reader is going to take:

In this Second American Civil War, whose side are you on?

Obviously people are supposed to take either the side of the left wing Judeo-Christian haters who would like to remove all evidence of American history before their beloved Roe v Wade decision and Stonewall riots happened, or the side of the left wing Jew hating-racist KKK, American Nazi Party, Alt Right movement-Trump supporters who are now supposedly the spokestrash for defending Southern heritage and culture.

The white supremacists lining up behind Trump
https://www.pri.org/stories/2015-08...n-supporters-theyre-not-his-only-questionable

When evil is the only option, since when is it required to take a side Mr. Buchanan?

I'll stick with 'the side' of God and let the chips fall where they may.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Let's see what LGBTQueer flag waver Donald Trump's federal government is up to when it comes to wasting taxpayer $$$$:

Feds Spend $438,699 Studying If ‘Gender Norms’ Make LGBTQ People Get Drunk

Grant: Alcohol is 'integral component of bars and clubs'

August 18, 2017

The National Institutes of Health is spending over $400,000 studying whether gender norms of masculinity and femininity lead LGBTQ individuals to drink too much.
Trying to find the "meanings of intoxication" of sexual and gender minorities is the central question of a*study that was awarded in late July.
The project will "examine the extent to which gendered norms shape risky drinking practices for sexual and gender minority (SGM) young adults," according to the grant for the study.
The grant states that alcohol is an "integral component of bars and clubs."
"Alcohol has played a central role for SGM by facilitating exploration of sexuality and gender, coping with minority stress, trauma, and stigma and serving as an integral component of bars and clubs for SGM young adults," the grant states. "Given this central role, it is not surprising that problematic alcohol use, including heavy episodic drinking (HED) and intoxication, and alcohol-related problems are significant issues for SGM young adults."
Researchers will conduct "in-depth interviews" with approximately 200 lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer individuals about their alcohol use, to determine why they drink...
Read more: http://freebeacon.com/issues/feds-spend-438699-studying-gender-norms-make-lgbtq-people-get-drunk/

I'll save the taxpayers $400,000+ and tell you why LGBTQueer people abuse alcohol and drugs:

Being that the vast majority were either sexually and/or psychologically abused as children and refuse to seek spiritual/psychological therapy to help them overcome their demons (and are constantly told by the LGBTQ movement that there is no way out of their 'deathstyle') they attempt to drown their nightmares with booze and drugs.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvOH44fXgAAL_sW.jpg

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Here's another pretty good article from Pat Buchanan, with a touch of sarcasm. Once again he's missing a few facts, which I will point out at the end of the article.

Pat Buchanan: Trump May Need Those Transgender Troops

July 31, 2017

Conservative commentator Pat Buchanan warns North Korea's nuclear escalation, deteriorating relations with Russia and China, and U.S. engagement in the Middle East are a growing challenge for the U.S. military — and President Donald Trump "may need those transgender troops."

In a piece for World Net Daily, Buchanan chides that, "Apparently, U.S. wars in Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Somalia are insufficient to satiate our War Party."

"Now it wants us to lead the Sunnis of the Middle East in taking down the Shiites, who are dominant in Iran, Iraq, Syria and South Lebanon, and are a majority in Bahrain and the oil-producing regions of Saudi Arabia."

Along with increasingly poor relations between the United States and Russia and China, and Kim Jong Un's goal to achieve "the ability to strike his enemy’s homeland with horrific impact, in order to deter that enemy," America's "military has its work cut out for it."

"President Trump may need those transgender troops," he wrote, referencing the president's tweet barring transgender troops in the military.

"Among the reasons Trump routed his Republican rivals in 2016 is that he seemed to share an American desire to look homeward," Buchanan argued. "Yet, today, our relations with China and Russia are as bad as they have been in decades, while there is open talk of war with Iran and North Korea.

"Was this what America voted for, or is this what America voted against?"

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/pat-buchanan-need-transgender-troops/2017/07/31/id/804940/

A couple of things Mr. Buchanan:

1). Donald Trump has a long history of being a transgender activist and has people in high places in the US Military to embrace his LGBTQ ideology (i.e. a late night "Tweet" doesn't mean anything).

2). Donald Trump has a long history of being cozy with Russia. He's not going to go to war with Russia and risk losing lucrative financial relations with the ultra corrupt country.

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/39/5b/32/395b32423808937e5600f08b9050ead1--trump-son-the-trump.jpg

BTW: Any Libertarians out there that would like to bash Trump for being a warmonger?

I didn't think so, as his rainbow flag waving stance is what's most important to Libertarians.