Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Do you know how homosexuals talk about what's in the latest edition of the NAMBLA newsletter or where the nearest HIV/AIDS clinic is? Well Christians talk about the Antichrist and who might fit the bill. Many thought that pro baby murderer/lover of sodomy B. Hussein Obama was.


They don't. That makes you sad considering the many hours you put in every month to write that newsletter.

The NAMBLA newsletter/bulletin comes in many different forms ...Dante (calling him "Mr." is so...sexist).

Take for instance this letter to the editor, written by UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell:

Tatchell-Letter-1997-06-26.png

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_glBntsvf...phwzOkU8/s1600/Tatchell-Letter-1997-06-26.png
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Please explain what Jesus meant by those words (Matthew 7:1-5)
in this specific incident.

He was telling people to not judge like hypocrites.

The people who brought the adulteress to Jesus were trying to trick Him, using the fact that the Jews did not have the authority to punish criminals, so if Jesus had said to stone her, they could have taken him to the Roman government prior to when He was ready to. By giving the answer He did, He not only avoided premature death, but also showed them that they were just as guilty of the crime as the woman was.

Conjecture: the words that were written on the ground by Jesus were the names of each of the men that brought the woman to Him. I can imagine after writing each name, Jesus would look up to the man who's name He had written, and the man would turn and walk away in shame.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Please explain what Jesus meant by those words (Matthew 7:1-5)
in this specific incident.[/quote]



He was telling people to not judge like hypocrites.
The people who brought the adulteress to Jesus were trying to trick Him, using the fact that the Jews did not have the authority to punish criminals, so if Jesus had said to stone her, they could have taken him to the Roman government prior to when He was ready to. By giving the answer He did, He not only avoided premature death, but also showed them that they were just as guilty of the crime as the woman was.

Conjecture: the words that were written on the ground by Jesus were the names of each of the men that brought the woman to Him. I can imagine after writing each name, Jesus would look up to the man who's name He had written, and the man would turn and walk away in shame.

One if not several of the men were adulterers, but would not come forward, hence their hypocrisy and hence the reason Jesus could not turn her over to the civil authorities.

Well said, thanks for the post!
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I'd ask you to comment on the 14+ minute video [of Pastor Scott Lively talking about Scripture and the Antichrist], but it's obviously above the head of your average pagan hair dresser.



Do you know how homosexuals talk about what's in the latest edition of the NAMBLA newsletter or where the nearest HIV/AIDS clinic is? Well Christians talk about the Antichrist and who might fit the bill. Many thought that pro baby murderer/lover of sodomy B. Hussein Obama was.

Speaking of Scott Lively: Tell me, does the LGBTQueer movement HATE him more than EX homosexuals? Based on what I've read it's a close toss up. Perhaps you can consult with ....Dante (using the title "Mr." is so 'Judeo-Christian') and tell the followers of the thread who LGBTQueer public enemy #2 is (It goes without saying that God is LGBTQueer public enemy #1).

I think he's more regarded as a crank than hated aCW, pretty much like you in that respect although his influence on Ugandan laws is certainly far from funny.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Quoting muscle queer Johann Hari from the same article:

"This is a taboo topic for a gay left-wing man like me to touch, but there has always been a weird, disproportionate overlap between homosexuality and fascism. Take a deep breath; here goes...

The twisted truth is that gay men have been at the heart of every major fascist movement that ever was - including the gay-gassing, homo-cidal Third Reich."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-strange-strange-story_b_136697.html

Even a proud and unrepentant homosexual can tell the truth on occasion.

Which he isn't here, it's just unsupported bunk. What he did get right was his critique of that barrel of yak droppings - 'The Pink Swastika'...
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
One if not several of the men were adulterers, but would not come forward, hence their hypocrisy and hence the reason Jesus could not turn her over to the civil authorities.

Well said, thanks for the post!

How do you know? Seriously, if all you legalists can take from the passage is that Jesus was merely avoiding a trap then you've more in common with those who were trying to set it...
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Take a moment and put yourself in the shoes of a Christian struggling with homosexuality. You want to follow Jesus and obey the Scriptures, but you find yourself attracted to the same sex, through no conscious choice of your own. You pray for God to change you and often cry yourself to sleep, only to wake up the next morning with the same unwanted attractions.
You wonder if God hates you and has singled you out for condemnation: God, why won’t you change me and make me normal?
You hit rock bottom and are considering suicide when someone tells you that your homosexuality is a gift, that God made you this way, and that preachers are misinterpreting the Bible when they say you can’t be a practicing homosexual and a Christian at the same time. Then they hand you your very own copy of the QJB, and voila, all those negative verses are gone.
Can you imagine how tempting it would be to embrace this new “revelation”?

Read more: http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/35014-the-queen-james-bible-and-homophobic-interpretations

Seek legitimate spiritual and psychological help before it's too late jgarden. I have links to counseling in page 1's index.

Here's another source and yes aCW, it features your personal hero again, Scott Lively talking to someone who isn't a fundamentalist indoctrinate though who used to be a victim of it...

I'm figuring you won't even consider the opposing view here but still...

 

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
... One if not several of the men were adulterers, but would not come forward, hence their hypocrisy and hence the reason Jesus could not turn her over to the civil authorities.
"aCultureWarrior" has the habit of putting words into the mouth of Jesus that He never spoke.

Christ never mentioned that the women's accusers had failed to produce additional witnesses nor did He assert that only those who had not committed adultery could cast the first stone."

Christ did say that only those "without sin" should cast the first stone - in the knowledge that He was the only person on earth who could make that claim.

Fast forward 2000 years - we have "aCultureWarrior's" attempting to justify his right to cast his own "stones" by criminalizing homosexuals.

Either "aCultureWarrior" considers himself to be without "sin," which for a Christian would constitute "blasphemy," or he is willfully ignoring a basic tenet of the Christian faith concerning the morality of sinners presuming to sit in God's "Judgment Seat," passing judgment on other sinners!
 
Last edited:

MrDante

New member
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Do you know how homosexuals talk about what's in the latest edition of the NAMBLA newsletter or where the nearest HIV/AIDS clinic is? Well Christians talk about the Antichrist and who might fit the bill. Many thought that pro baby murderer/lover of sodomy B. Hussein Obama was.




The NAMBLA newsletter/bulletin comes in many different forms ...Dante (calling him "Mr." is so...sexist).

Take for instance this letter to the editor, written by UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell:

Tatchell-Letter-1997-06-26.png

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_glBntsvf...phwzOkU8/s1600/Tatchell-Letter-1997-06-26.png

Still trying to pass this off? Sad
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Speaking of Scott Lively: Tell me, does the LGBTQueer movement HATE him more than EX homosexuals? Based on what I've read it's a close toss up. Perhaps you can consult with ....Dante (using the title "Mr." is so 'Judeo-Christian') and tell the followers of the thread who LGBTQueer public enemy #2 is (It goes without saying that God is LGBTQueer public enemy #1).

I think he's more regarded as a crank than hated aCW, pretty much like you in that respect although his influence on Ugandan laws is certainly far from funny.

Based on the number of posts that you've made (and a thread dedicated to mocking Scott Lively) I get the feeling that he ranks pretty high on your hate scale.

Followers of this 4 part thread remember how seriously the LGBTQueer movement took it when Pastor Scott Lively went to Uganda to assist them with their problem with homosexuality. Besides the indoctrination of youth, homosexuals from foreign countries were going into Uganda and buying the 'services' of young black boys (and in the case of lesbians, girls) and amongst other things leaving them with things that are common amongst homosexuals:

HIV/AIDS.

https://www.academia.org/nambla-gate-part-one/
 
Last edited:

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

The NAMBLA newsletter/bulletin comes in many different forms (such as UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell writing a letter to the editor stating that some children as young as 9 years old enjoy having sex with adults).

Still trying to pass this off? Sad

Then there's guys like 'gay icon' Larry Brinkin (posted on page 1 of "WHMBR! Part 3") :

San Francisco’s Gay Icon Larry Brinkin Guilty of Felony Child Porn Possession

CNSNews.com) – Larry Brinkin, who worked at the Human Rights Commission for the City of San Francisco for 22 years and was a prominent homosexual rights activist for more than 40 years, pleaded guilty to felony child pornography possession last week.

Brinkin is expected to serve six months in jail, five years of probation, and register as a sex offender for the rest of his life when he is sentenced on Mar. 5. But he likely will get to keep his city pension because possessing and viewing child porn apparently is not considered a crime of “moral turpitude” under San Francisco’s retirement/pension rules.

According to police, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle and SF Weekly, Brinkin had photographic images of children between the ages of 1 and 3 who were being sodomized and forced to perform oral sex on adult men...

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-3&p=3922821&viewfull=1#post3922821

I wonder how Larry Brinkin did in prison?

4E8IQz0.jpg
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
I wanted to address this post a couple of pages back from the thread's LGBTQ monologue wonder because it has so much in common with a TOLer who claims to be a conservative.

If "Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized," then all sin should be criminalized - and since we are all sinners, we are all criminals!
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4928950&viewfull=1#post4928950

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Thoughts on the LGBTQ backed Employment Non Discrimination Act? Should homosexuals be denied employment and a place to live based on their sexual orientation?

Quote: Originally posted by Angel4Truth
No, you dont get to tell me what to think and how to answer, but you got my answer same as before, if we limit anyones ability to have housing or own property based on sin, no one could do so.
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...-Almost-Over&p=4911231&viewfull=1#post4911231

Based on the above two attempts at logic, there should be no laws nor should people be allowed to deny perverts a job or rent them a room in their house because everyone is a sinner.

Sounds like anarchy to me.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Here's another source and yes aCW, it features your personal hero again, Scott Lively talking to someone who isn't a fundamentalist indoctrinate though who used to be a victim of it...

I'm figuring you won't even consider the opposing view here but still...

Spoiler


Thank you for sharing that video with the thread Art, as it shows how compassionate Pastor Scott Lively is towards sexually and morally confused people like Vicky Beeching. Note how Beeching uses science (albeit poorly) to make her case for homosexuality (although she didn't go into specifics, like being born with that non existent 'gay' gene), and avoided theology all together.

I hope that Christians following this thread pray for Vicky Beeching to overcome her homosexual desires and the destructive lifestyle that goes with it. I hope that Christians following this thread will also take note how the LGBTQ movement is permeating the Church in an attempt to redefine Judeo-Christian doctrine to satisfy their own selfish and perverted desires.
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
=aCultureWarrior;4931426 I hope that Christians following this thread will also take note how the LGBTQ movement is permeating the Church in an attempt to redefine Judeo-Christian doctrine to satisfy their own selfish and perverted desires.
So true aCW - keep us up to date
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I hope that Christians following this thread will also take note how the LGBTQ movement is permeating the Church in an attempt to redefine Judeo-Christian doctrine to satisfy their own selfish and perverted desires.


So true aCW - keep us up to date

Yeah, they say things like:

Quote: Originally posted by patrick jane
P.S. i am not against homosexuals or gay marriage either when based on love and family and doing good and charitable deeds. Jesus Christ's Commandments are from the Father and His teachings are as well. Meshak is right -

Quote: Originally posted by patrick jane
gay basher alert - ACW IS anti-freedom
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?112026-remember&p=4404165&viewfull=1#post4404165
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Spoiler


Thank you for sharing that video with the thread Art, as it shows how compassionate Pastor Scott Lively is towards sexually and morally confused people like Vicky Beeching. Note how Beeching uses science (albeit poorly) to make her case for homosexuality (although she didn't go into specifics, like being born with that non existent 'gay' gene), and avoided theology all together.

I hope that Christians following this thread pray for Vicky Beeching to overcome her homosexual desires and the destructive lifestyle that goes with it. I hope that Christians following this thread will also take note how the LGBTQ movement is permeating the Church in an attempt to redefine Judeo-Christian doctrine to satisfy their own selfish and perverted desires.

He and his ilk were part of the problem for people like Vicky, not the solution as she outlines. Her honesty is as obvious as your insincerity.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Lt. Gen. Hal Moore Dies; Depicted in Film 'We Were Soldiers'

Feb. 12, 2017

Retired Lt. Gen. Harold G. "Hal" Moore, the American hero known for saving most of his men in the first major battle between the U.S. and North Vietnamese armies, has died. He was 94.
Joseph Galloway, who with Moore co-authored the book "We Were Soldiers Once ... and Young," confirmed Saturday to The Associated Press that Moore died late Friday in his sleep at his home in Auburn, Alabama.
Galloway said Moore, his friend of 51 years, died two days shy of his 95th birthday.

There's something missing on this earth now. We've lost a great warrior, a great soldier, a great human being and my best friend. They don't make them like him anymore," Galloway said.
Moore was best known for his actions at the 1965 Battle of Ia Drang, where he was a lieutenant colonel in command of the 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment. His actions were later reflected in the movie "We Were Soldiers" in which actor Mel Gibson portrayed Moore. The book tells what happened to virtually every trooper involved in the 34-day campaign and the climactic four-day battle in which 234 Americans died at landing zones X-Ray and Albany in November 1965...

Read more: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/hal-moore-dies-we/2017/02/12/id/773176/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7OPPWlKV2A

Rest In Peace Lt. General Moore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top