GFR7
New member
I don't have rainbow colors. But self-deception is a human error: He was taking reports by ADULTS at face value. (He was likely one of the reporting adults.)
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3
- Thread starter aCultureWarrior
- Start date
- Status
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Once again your rainbow colors are shining through GFR7.
The problem with people like Peter the pedophile Tatchell is not that they're making some kind of "psychological error", they're morally corrupt.
Anyone that dares to say that any child might have enjoyed a sexual experience with an adult is an out and out pervert.
But then those who proudly engage in homosexual behavior have no moral basis to begin with, so why wouldn't they be able to justify that some children actually "wanted" to have sex with an adult?
Here's the link that I used earlier that summarized the findings of the pro pedophile/pederast study.
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html
Tell us how someone could misconstrue the findings that not all adult-child sex is unwanted, abusive and harmful and that the study shouldn't be taken at "face value".
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Once again your rainbow colors are shining through GFR7.
The problem with people like Peter the pedophile Tatchell is not that they're making some kind of "psychological error", they're morally corrupt.
Anyone that dares to say that any child might have enjoyed a sexual experience with an adult is an out and out pervert.
But then those who proudly engage in homosexual behavior have no moral basis to begin with, so why wouldn't they be able to justify that some children actually "wanted" to have sex with an adult?
Here's the link that I used earlier that summarized the findings of the pro pedophile/pederast study.
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html
Tell us how someone could misconstrue the findings that not all adult-child sex is unwanted, abusive and harmful and that the study shouldn't be taken at "face value".
GFR7
New member
For crying out loud.... :nono: I said that TATCHELL had taken adult reports of "no harm" too much at face value, you first class idiot. :madmad:
OK, who are these researchers? They are trying to support empirical data. Are they gay? :think:
Again, tell me how that report should have been viewed.
"Scientists/professional researchers" from NAMBLA and the APA working for the betterment of mankind (because having sex with 9 year olds is good for society).
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Again, tell me how that report should have been viewed.
Unless I missed it somewhere in the link that I provided, the Rind report didn't say that, you are.
A study entitled "A Meta-analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," published in the July 1998 edition of the prestigious Psychological Bulletin , resulted in enormous social controversy and debate. The study's authors, Rind, Tromovitch and Bauserman, analyzed 59 studies of college students and concluded that mental health researchers have greatly overstated the harmful potential of being abused. Despite finding that students who reported a history of child sexual abuse (CSA) were less well adjusted in 17 of the 18 types of psychological adjustment examined, Rind et al. (1998) suggested that the relationship may be spurious due to the confounding of CSA with family dysfunction. Rind et al. also reported that "men reacted much less negatively than women" (p. 22) and that "consent" was an important moderator of adjustment in males. They later summarized their findings, stating: "We showed that for boys in nonclinical populations, willing relations are generally experienced positively or neutrally and are not associated with maladjustment" (Rind, Bauserman, & Tromovitch, 1999, p. 2185). Rind et al. (1998) went on to suggest that when labeling events that have "heretofore been defined sociolegally as CSA," scientists should focus on the young person's perception of the experience: A willing encounter with positive reactions would no longer be considered to be sexual abuse; instead, it would "be labeled simply adult-child sex " (p. 46).
Not surprisingly, the study was immediately embraced by pedophile organizations. The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), a political and educational organization that advocates for the decriminalization of "consensual" pedophilic relationships, stated that the study confirmed that, "the current war on boy-lovers has no basis in science." NAMBLA also publicly thanked the American Psychological Association (APA) for "having the courage" to publish the paper (Saunders, 1999).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4235372&postcount=5989
Quote:
"Scientists/professional researchers" from NAMBLA and the APA working for the betterment of mankind (because having sex with 9 year olds is good for society).
Back to your LGBTQueer drawing board GFR7.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Again, tell me how that report should have been viewed.
Unless I missed it somewhere in the link that I provided, the Rind report didn't say that, you are.
A study entitled "A Meta-analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," published in the July 1998 edition of the prestigious Psychological Bulletin , resulted in enormous social controversy and debate. The study's authors, Rind, Tromovitch and Bauserman, analyzed 59 studies of college students and concluded that mental health researchers have greatly overstated the harmful potential of being abused. Despite finding that students who reported a history of child sexual abuse (CSA) were less well adjusted in 17 of the 18 types of psychological adjustment examined, Rind et al. (1998) suggested that the relationship may be spurious due to the confounding of CSA with family dysfunction. Rind et al. also reported that "men reacted much less negatively than women" (p. 22) and that "consent" was an important moderator of adjustment in males. They later summarized their findings, stating: "We showed that for boys in nonclinical populations, willing relations are generally experienced positively or neutrally and are not associated with maladjustment" (Rind, Bauserman, & Tromovitch, 1999, p. 2185). Rind et al. (1998) went on to suggest that when labeling events that have "heretofore been defined sociolegally as CSA," scientists should focus on the young person's perception of the experience: A willing encounter with positive reactions would no longer be considered to be sexual abuse; instead, it would "be labeled simply adult-child sex " (p. 46).
Not surprisingly, the study was immediately embraced by pedophile organizations. The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), a political and educational organization that advocates for the decriminalization of "consensual" pedophilic relationships, stated that the study confirmed that, "the current war on boy-lovers has no basis in science." NAMBLA also publicly thanked the American Psychological Association (APA) for "having the courage" to publish the paper (Saunders, 1999).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4235372&postcount=5989
Quote:
"Scientists/professional researchers" from NAMBLA and the APA working for the betterment of mankind (because having sex with 9 year olds is good for society).
Back to your LGBTQueer drawing board GFR7.
alwight
New member
Yes aCW I was simply telling it how it is.
Clearly you wouldn't want to allow anyone to be able to choose when and how many babies they bring into this world aCW, you certainly wouldn't want to allow any woman that kind of choice because you want to control it for them right? ...because you speak for God right?.
I'm sorry you don't like the way society has become aCW, perhaps you should form an armed religious militia to take over the world, how about "Christian State" for a name? :idea:
You could always behead women who dared to have abortions?
Who exactly gets to decide what, if anything, is supposedly destroying the nucleus of society, you?
In a democratic country hopefully the majority have decided for themselves what is best for their society.
You otoh don't agree and want to impose your theocratic beliefs on the majority, I don't think that you like democracy very much, do you aCW?
Otoh you probably do like it sometimes but perhaps only if you are in the majority? But perhaps you don't really want to know or understand how democracy works because your divine authority trumps it every time, right aCW?
Good luck with your Christian State theocratic militia aCW.
That's probably about the only way you'll ever avoid all those pesky choices made by the democratic majority that have oh so ruined society for you and your God.
lain:
Then use the evidence that I've provided (or your own LGBTQueer websites) to make your case.
..."consent" was an important moderator of adjustment in males...
"...willing relations are generally experienced positively or neutrally and are not associated with maladjustment"
"...scientists should focus on the young person's perception of the experience: A willing encounter with positive reactions would no longer be considered to be sexual abuse; instead, it would "be labeled simply adult-child sex "
Nope, not intended for pedophiles or pederasts whatsoever.
BBB (buh bye bruth).
GFR7
New member
I already did. I said people who as adults say that a childhood sexual encounter with an adult was consensual and joyous and caused no harm, often change their minds at a later date. I can't help it if they didn't run into any of those persons and include it in the report.
They were trying to shorten the prison sentences...."consent" was an important moderator of adjustment in males...
"...willing relations are generally experienced positively or neutrally and are not associated with maladjustment"
"...scientists should focus on the young person's perception of the experience: A willing encounter with positive reactions would no longer be considered to be sexual abuse; instead, it would "be labeled simply adult-child sex "
Nope, not intended for pedophiles or pederasts whatsoever.
Ummm, I don't think so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Then use the evidence that I've provided (or your own LGBTQueer websites) to make your case.
Obviously they didn't attempt to find those people because of the harm that it would have done to their adult-child sex cause.
Quote:
..."consent" was an important moderator of adjustment in males...
"...willing relations are generally experienced positively or neutrally and are not associated with maladjustment"
"...scientists should focus on the young person's perception of the experience: A willing encounter with positive reactions would no longer be considered to be sexual abuse; instead, it would "be labeled simply adult-child sex "
Nope, not intended for pedophiles or pederasts whatsoever.
So the study had absolutely nothing to do with the 1972 'gay' agenda and lowering and eventually abolishing age of consent laws, but was only about being "kinder and gentler" to kiddy rapists?
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Then use the evidence that I've provided (or your own LGBTQueer websites) to make your case.
Obviously they didn't attempt to find those people because of the harm that it would have done to their adult-child sex cause.
Quote:
..."consent" was an important moderator of adjustment in males...
"...willing relations are generally experienced positively or neutrally and are not associated with maladjustment"
"...scientists should focus on the young person's perception of the experience: A willing encounter with positive reactions would no longer be considered to be sexual abuse; instead, it would "be labeled simply adult-child sex "
Nope, not intended for pedophiles or pederasts whatsoever.
So the study had absolutely nothing to do with the 1972 'gay' agenda and lowering and eventually abolishing age of consent laws, but was only about being "kinder and gentler" to kiddy rapists?
GFR7
New member
aCW: Do not despair; there is hope! :jawdrop:
Happens that we will be able to identify these people
in future by their footwear, and to warn the public about them. :think:
Although I must admit, I do own a pair like the ones second from the right -
and even wore them with black jeans in Provincetown......:think:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/...ter_n_6752480.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000050
Happens that we will be able to identify these people
in future by their footwear, and to warn the public about them. :think:
Although I must admit, I do own a pair like the ones second from the right -
and even wore them with black jeans in Provincetown......:think:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/...ter_n_6752480.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000050
shagster01
New member
That is good news for aCW. Otherwise he'd have to look at the plank in his own eye.
you'll be singing the same tune about pedophiles soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwight
We first have to decide, as a society, what is not acceptable behaviour and then create laws to enforce it.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I do believe that's been done already Al:
58 million abortions in the past 42 years, and the vast majority done out of convenience.
Indoctrinating children (and society in general) to accept sexual perversion as something normal.
Pornography available at the click of a mouse, etc.
I was thinking more of educating people and getting them active so that they'll vote men and women into political office with strong moral fiber.
But wait...there's more!
I was also thinking that those same people who vote men and women with strong moral fiber into political office also influence our culture which currently embraces death to one that embraces life.
There you have it Al, aCW's plan to rule the world!
Originally Posted by alwight
We first have to decide, as a society, what is not acceptable behaviour and then create laws to enforce it.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I do believe that's been done already Al:
58 million abortions in the past 42 years, and the vast majority done out of convenience.
Indoctrinating children (and society in general) to accept sexual perversion as something normal.
Pornography available at the click of a mouse, etc.
I'm sorry you don't like the way society has become aCW, perhaps you should form an armed religious militia to take over the world, how about "Christian State" for a name? :idea:
You could always behead women who dared to have abortions?
I was thinking more of educating people and getting them active so that they'll vote men and women into political office with strong moral fiber.
But wait...there's more!
I was also thinking that those same people who vote men and women with strong moral fiber into political office also influence our culture which currently embraces death to one that embraces life.
There you have it Al, aCW's plan to rule the world!
GFR7
New member
No wonder you hate me, if you think I wear Miss Nancy shoes like that. :noway: :think:You're not fooling anyone nancy boy, here's what your shoe closet looks like.
I'll have you know I am a very masculine and conservative dresser. :AMR1:
But aCW, did you see this on Free Republic?
Now instead of LGBTQ, it is LGBTTQQFAGPBDSM! :jawdrop:
Spoiler
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3261621/posts
Once again you're confusing me hating you with feeling sorry for you and wanting you to seek help.
(i.e. he would have fit into Hitler's SS mahhhhvelously).
"Open House," they explained, "is a safe space for... and for people of sexually or gender dissident communities."
For those of you that don't understand the last part: it means those who are into kiddy sex are also welcome.
You act as if you're offended GFR7. Your LGBTQueer movement (according to AFTAH's Peter LaBarbera they want to be called that) is inclusive, i.e. all perversions are welcome in the sexual anarchist movement.
Last edited:
- Status