The Tye & BillyBob distraction
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
- Status
Mateo
New member
Billy;
I am quite aware of your battles with Sozo, that is why I posted what I did, it was a joke.
Mateo:
And well you should be, you've egged on more than one of them. Come to think of it, if one were to dispassionately review the entirety of your offerings here on TOL this would appear to be your one over-arching purpose... to instigate fights.
To what end friend? How does this edify the body? What is your purpose in doing this?
I am quite aware of your battles with Sozo, that is why I posted what I did, it was a joke.
Mateo:
And well you should be, you've egged on more than one of them. Come to think of it, if one were to dispassionately review the entirety of your offerings here on TOL this would appear to be your one over-arching purpose... to instigate fights.
To what end friend? How does this edify the body? What is your purpose in doing this?
Actually, I can't think of too many times you and I have even posted to each other, Mateo. I usually just stay out of the way when Sozo is on a rampage. As far as instigating fights, I think you are making a very broad assertion based on a few instances. Most of the fights I have instigated have included me as the main target, nothing wrong with that.
Make it so they could only fight and argue in the "Back Alley" forum. Let them have their own thread, and whoever wants to see what they are saying from day to day, can go there. Also throw out all posting rules in that thread only. Only they can post on it, but anyone can read it.
That's never going to work. Tye can't keep his big fat pie hole shut and will say all sorts of ridiculous things in every thread he visits. It's his nature to be stupid.
And of course, I will have to respond to his ravings.
I tried putting him on my 'Ignore List' for a few weeks and all that did was give him free reign to run around spouting off his drivel, unchecked.
[I could read his posts when other people quoted the idiot]
And of course, I will have to respond to his ravings.
I tried putting him on my 'Ignore List' for a few weeks and all that did was give him free reign to run around spouting off his drivel, unchecked.
[I could read his posts when other people quoted the idiot]
Mateo
New member
"Actually, I can't think of too many times you and I have even posted to each other, Mateo."
Right you are and there is likely a very good reason for this. Likely we hold dissimilar interests.
"I usually just stay out of the way when Sozo is on a rampage. As far as instigating fights, I think you are making a very broad assertion based on a few instances. Most of the fights I have instigated have included me as the main target, nothing wrong with that."
To paraphrase the word of God, " Each man's way is right in his own eyes..."
Right you are and there is likely a very good reason for this. Likely we hold dissimilar interests.
"I usually just stay out of the way when Sozo is on a rampage. As far as instigating fights, I think you are making a very broad assertion based on a few instances. Most of the fights I have instigated have included me as the main target, nothing wrong with that."
To paraphrase the word of God, " Each man's way is right in his own eyes..."
Here is an offer I publically made to Tye. [Just keepin' it real with my peeps] 
Origially posted by BillyBib
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=451724#post451724
Origially posted by BillyBib
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=451724#post451724
Just one question Nineveh.
Are you really so stupid to think that my animosity towards Tye has anything to do with him witnessing?
Another question.
Do you actually believe that witnessing was his intention?
One more.
Show me ANY situation where I exuded animus toward ANY person simply because he was witnessing to me! I am quite polite about it because I understand it. My animosity towards Tye is the same that many others TOLers have for him and it has nothing to do with witnessing.
You are blind.
Nineveh;
Is this a "yes" or a "no"?
Originally posted by BillyBob
Just one question Nineveh.
Are you really so stupid to think that my animosity towards Tye has anything to do with him witnessing? YES!
Another question.
Do you actually believe that witnessing was his intention?YES!
Is this a "yes" or a "no"?
Originally posted by BillyBob
Just one question Nineveh.
Are you really so stupid to think that my animosity towards Tye has anything to do with him witnessing? YES!
Another question.
Do you actually believe that witnessing was his intention?YES!
Nineveh
Merely Christian
Seems your "actions" are speaking louder than your words. I wasn't talking to you about Tye. I was asking you if those who witness to you next will meet the same treatment you give to Tye now.
Should I overlook you have already called me "Tye", a liar, an idiot, and stupid today, just so I may assume you mean, "no"?
Last edited:
Being new, and given the fact that I don't really know anyone here well enough to pick friends or choose sides, I feel I can give an unbiased opinion. First of all, I don't dislike either of you. I am not one to judge others on their Christianity. I don't know who is is who isn't a Christian, and furthermore, it isn't my place to make that call anyway. What I do see is two adult men arguing like two children on a playground who want the same toy to play with. Each child can give what he thinks is a good reason why he should have the toy. With each reason given, the other child rebukes, and it goes on and on. All along the toy is getting old and the batteries are going dead. The two of you aren't going to agree on too much of anything, so why argue? I have been going back to old posts between both of you, and I see poor behavior from both sides. I also see both of you posting good stuff when it isn't regarding each other. I guess some think it is funny, and I must admit, that some of it does get a chuckle from me. Most of it however is just immature name calling. Isn't there anything that each of you can say nice about the other?
Knight,
I voted "other" because I have been lucky enough to have somehow avoided this feud that has been going on between the two and I didn't want to vote to ban them without having a clearer understanding of what has been going on.
After having read most of this thread, it seems to me that the decision is pretty cut and dried. If they refuse to obey you then ban them. How long they are banned depends on the severity of the offense (obviously), but not to ban them is to effectively give them permission to continue to ignore you.
I voted "other" because I have been lucky enough to have somehow avoided this feud that has been going on between the two and I didn't want to vote to ban them without having a clearer understanding of what has been going on.
After having read most of this thread, it seems to me that the decision is pretty cut and dried. If they refuse to obey you then ban them. How long they are banned depends on the severity of the offense (obviously), but not to ban them is to effectively give them permission to continue to ignore you.
- Status