PKevman
New member
Spout off? You have yet to prove it wasn't the case.:help:
Or even if it is proper.
Right so would you mind answering Granite's question then?
Thanks Bob
- Thread starter drbrumley
- Start date
- Status
Right so would you mind answering Granite's question then?
drbrumley
Well-known member
Right so would you mind answering Granite's question then?
Why, Granite is a big boy. he can handle it.
Last edited:
PKevman
New member
It's ok you proved my point with your answer. And you didn't even know it. :rotfl:
:banana:
S†ephen
New member
Well, no offense, but I could care less about what you want. It's what God wants. And God doesn't want a dictatorship, a single man who wields all the power. I don't care if Alan Keyes was Saint Paul I would not elect him into that position, neither would God. You want a total dictatorship where the dirty work is done in secret to make your life better.
The Bible.
Going on this logic let's rid ourselves of all government as we both know Satan controls it.
God.
So like I said, let's start a revolution. You with me?
And maybe when Alan Keyes leaves we'll have abortion again!
You have absolutely no evidence to back up this statement. You have never seen it before.
Homosexuality isn't a capital crime.
No it wasn't wrong. Because God was in direct contact with a special race of people he had set aside to be pure. Why don't you ask me if it was wrong for God to make Sampson have long hair.
CONTEXT
Answer me this: Are you willing to support killing people who have never harmed you.
Which is what Alan Keys isn't going to do. He is going to use the same system we have now. The man is a coward who won't destroy the evil oppression we have now.
drbrumley
Well-known member
Ok then, if I did, maybe you can enlighten this unenlightened one!
S†ephen
New member
yer askin for it.:comeout:
The federal government's intended and proper role is to provide for national defense, foreign policy, and revenue (Article 1, Section 8, of the constitution pretty much spells this out). I see very few, if any powers beyond that they lie in the fed's bailiwick. In turn, such power should be held in the hands of the states. Any violation of this trust on the part of Washington is a direct violation of state sovereignty and should be construed as intrusive tyranny. Any willingness to submit to this kind of centralized power is slavish and absurd.
I believe the issue of abortion, like virtually any other, should be decided and controlled by the states of the union and not by Washington. Hopefully by spelling this out I've cleared up any lingering confusion (and spared you and others the pain and time of responding to my previous post on page 76 of this thread).
S†ephen
New member
"Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all.
We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say we want no religion at all. We object to state enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise the grain.
- Excerpt from The Law
By Frederick Bastiat
PKevman
New member
Now can you enlighten us as to the point of posting that? Are you calling me a socialist?
S†ephen
New member
You know the point. :nono:
S†ephen
New member
Yes. Only law. No government.
But as that is an impossibility I will go with the next best thing.
Ron Paul.
S†ephen
New member
Yes. It was only punishable by death when God was in specific physical interaction with them and it was the Israelite race only.
PKevman
New member
Since you believe that all government is wicked and that all law enforcement officers are wicked, then who would you prefer to enforce the laws that existed? Do you really understand what type of society you are trying to say should be in existence? Is it your position that each individual citizen would enforce the law themselves? Is THAT your position?
PKevman
New member
Paul said homosexuals were deserving of death. God utterly destroyed the wicked homosexuals of Sodom for their sin.
You might want to further research what the Bible has to say on this topic.
S†ephen
New member
Of course I understand it. I don't get how you can look at 8,000 years or more of human history and support government. It's never worked once, and making Alan Keyes an all powerful president, even if he's a good one, will lead to greater problems on down the line when another evil man uses the power he has for sin. So yes, it is my position.
Paul said homosexuals were deserving of death. God utterly destroyed the wicked homosexuals of Sodom for their sin.
You might want to further research what the Bible has to say on this topic.
And he mentioned several other sins that didn't harm another individual and said they were deserving of death as well. You're taking it out of context. Either you need to do the executing or stop supporting a government agent doing it. I researched it plenty, the Bible says God came to bring LIFE not death.
Paul said homosexuals were deserving of death. God utterly destroyed the wicked homosexuals of Sodom for their sin.
You might want to further research what the Bible has to say on this topic.
Ezekiel disagrees with your conclusion.
In all seriousness, you're sounding more and more like a troll lately. You used to actually have a thing or two to say around here. What gives?
- Status