Roy Moore, OJ Simpson, And why I don't believe you.

fool

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
So, for some closure to the Sheriff Clarke aside;
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...riff-david-clarke-lawsuit-20180122-story.html

And the Judge earlier threw out the rest of the suit;
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...riff-david-clarke-lawsuit-20180106-story.html

If the deputies did not do what Clarke told them,and didn't detain the man, they did Clarke a huge favor.

The discovered text indicates that Clarke ordered Black be detained for a field interview. It matters because case law requires a "reasonable articulable suspicion", that the subject has committed a crime, is about to commit a crime, or is in the process of committing a crime, if he is to be detained.



Except for his butt-hurt threats against Black. The Court let that stand. Kind of poetic justice that his mouth put him in the box.

The court let the suit go forward on just the Facebook stuff and the Jury sided with Clarke.
 

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
20090503.jpg


Roy Moore, OJ Simpson, And why I don't believe you.

Now Trump has moved on to $130 000 in hush money going to "Stormy Daniels" - our conservative "friends" will try to dismiss her as an FBI agent trying to entrap the President or perhaps an operative from the "deep state!"
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
Roy Moore, OJ Simpson, And why I don't believe you.

Now Trump has moved on to $130 000 in hush money going to "Stormy Daniels" - our conservative "friends" will try to dismiss her as an FBI agent trying to entrap the President or perhaps an operative from the "deep state!"

You're thinking of a different porn actress, and the title of the movie wasn't "deep state."
 

fool

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
20090503.jpg


Roy Moore, OJ Simpson, And why I don't believe you.

Now Trump has moved on to $130 000 in hush money going to "Stormy Daniels" - our conservative "friends" will try to dismiss her as an FBI agent trying to entrap the President or perhaps an operative from the "deep state!"

Nobody cares.
 

Derf

Well-known member
186124_600.jpg



If Moore and Trump aren't scared that they have nothing to hide, then both would be filing defamation suits to clear their reputations!

The reality is that they both know that their past sexual histories could never stand up to the glare of intense public scrutiny - and now everybody knows it!

Roy Moore sues 4 women who have accused him of inappropriate behavior: https://www.ajc.com/news/national/r...nappropriate-behavior/BOmXz2WXie2xyi9uqSJQ1M/

So now what? Roy Moore, according to your logic, has nothing to hide, right?
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
Roy Moore, OJ Simpson, And why I don't believe you.

After the "Hollywood Tape," candidate Trump threatened to sue women in an attempt to silence them from making allegations about his inappropriate behaviour - taking legal action would have exposed this President's entire "sexual" history!

Not only did Trump refrain from following through with those threats, but we now know that he was secretly engaged in paying "hush-money" to women, just before the 2016 Election, with whom he had had affairs as long as a decade ago!
 

Derf

Well-known member
Suggesting an innocent man would protest his innocence if he is defamed isn't invalidated by a guilty man doing likewise. It isn't that the protest establishes his innocence, but it's still what you should reasonably expect.

I agree with you, and I agree with [MENTION=7147]jgarden[/MENTION].

jgarden said:
If Moore and Trump aren't scared that they have nothing to hide, then both would be filing defamation suits to clear their reputations!

The reality is that they both know that their past sexual histories could never stand up to the glare of intense public scrutiny - and now everybody knows it!


I'm not trying to defend Pres Trump's sexual escapades, but I think, based on just a little knowledge of Roy Moore, that Roy Moore is innocent of the charges that were brought against him in the court of public apinion, at least the charges of sexual misconduct. The charges of seducing a minor was already debunked some time ago, except in the case of Corfman, whose charges are at the center of Moore's defamation lawsuit, as well as a personal lawsuit she is bringing.

And I tend to agree with some of jgarden's point--that filing defamation lawsuits, in Moore's case--WOULD subject his past sexual history to the glare of public scrutiny.
 

musterion

Well-known member
i suspect you'd find it nearly impossible to find a leftist/dem who rejects this sort of behavior when the right is targeted by their supporters


i'm willing to be surprised, but don't expect to be

You won't be. They're hypocrites; it's always somehow "different" if not justifiable when their side is caught doing what they accuse the Right of doing.
 
Top