Proof that Paul didn't preach a different gospel than Peter

[God's Truth]

The gospel John the baptizer proclaimed is that Jesus is the Messiah and gives forgiveness of sins.

When Jesus preached he preached believe and repent, and that there is forgiveness through him.

The Apostles taught that, even the Apostle Paul.

 

[lifeisgood]

There is only One True Gospel and there is only One True God.

The ONE gospel is being preached to both Jew (by Peter) and Gentile (by Paul).

The Scripture clearly declares:
ONE holy Lawgiver,
ONE Law,
ONE penalty for its violation,
ONE universal condition of man,
ONE perfect Lawkeeper,
ONE perfect Sacrifice,
and
ONE Mediator, WHO is the ONE Way — Jesus Christ and Him Crucified.

 

[john w]

Stop lying about what I say

Nope. You say that it should not be in the bible-you assert that the 12 knew about the dbr-lie:

Luke 18 KJV
31 Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished. 32 For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on: 33 and they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again. 34 And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things which were spoken.

Just because they did not understand yet and it was hid from them does not mean they were taught a different gospel

You're on drugs/wine. You assert that they were preaching the good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, which includes the

Death
Burial
Resurrection

...and yet the death, burial, resurrection was hid from them. They were preaching something they knew nothing about, according to your "silly goose-ism."


You just lied-again.

Luke 18 KJV
31 Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished. 32 For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on: 33 and they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again. 34 And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things which were spoken.The good news and gospel was that Jesus is the Messiah and salvation through the forgiveness of sin.

 

[God's Truth]

John W., you prove you cannot defend your doctrines. You do not have truth so your resort to lies about me and insults.

 

[john w]

The good news and gospel was that Jesus is the Messiah and salvation through the forgiveness of sin.


Mark 1:1
[ John the Baptist Prepares the Way ] The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God,

Luke 1:77 to give his people the knowledge of salvation through the forgiveness of their sins,

The good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV is the preaching of the death, burial, resurrection, as it's foundation, a dbr the 12 knew NADA about, while preaching "the gospel of the kingdom"-so much for your "just one piece of good news in the book" lie.

 

[john w]

John W., you prove you cannot defend your doctrines. You do not have truth so your resort to lies about me and insults.

The Silly Goose's concession whimper, not producing that chapter/verse, as she spams her "lies....insults" "Hail Mary" on every thread.

Sit down.

 

[glorydaz]

I don't understand. Paul's letters make it absolutely clear that he and the members of the Jerusalem church (Peter, Jesus' brother James and many other original followers) had some serious conflicts over table fellowship practice and admittance of Gentiles into the new faith.

We have to realize Paul's testimony is self-serving. He realizes he is not one of the actual apostles but has to make sure he is included in that number nevertheless. There is a lot of defensiveness in his letters about the dispute with Peter and the other apostles.

Great example of sour grapes.

 

[tetelestai]

I closed the thread to stop snakes like you from derailing/hijacking a good thread.

No, you closed the thread because you know that 2 Peter 3 destroys your false "two gospel" theory.

(2 Peter 3:15 KJV) And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;

In your thread, and this thread, you have yet to actually address 2 Peter 3 because you know you can't.

 

[tetelestai]

I am a dispensationalist of the Mid Acts variety, and I say that all of those Peter addressed in his epistles were members of the Body of Christ.

That's correct.

However, that does not change the fact that during the Acts period Paul preached two different gospels.

For arguments sake, were both recipients of Paul's alleged two different gospels members of the Body of Christ?

Also, can you address 2 Peter 3?

Before Peter wrote his epistle to the Galatians, Paul told the Galatians that if anyone preaches a different gospel, they are to be accursed.

If Peter preached a different gospel to the Galatians after Paul wrote his epistle to the Galatians, then should Peter have been accursed?

 

[patrick jane]

No, you closed the thread because you know that 2 Peter 3 destroys your false "two gospel" theory.

(2 Peter 3:15 KJV) And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;

In your thread, and this thread, you have yet to actually address 2 Peter 3 because you know you can't.

Tet, it is answered in the very next verse - despite the OTHER irrefutable proofs already shown to you from Scripture. 2Peter 3:16 shows clearly that at the time Peter wrote that he was finally beginning to barely understand Paul's epistles and gospel of salvation -

2 Peter 3:16 KJV - - 2 Peter 3:16 NIV -

Galatians 2:7 KJV -

Galatians 2:11 KJV -

Galatians 2:14 KJV -

and many more -

end of all 1 gospel only threads - :idea:

 

[john w]

No, you closed the thread because you know that 2 Peter 3 destroys your false "two gospel" theory.

(2 Peter 3:15 KJV) And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;

In your thread, and this thread, you have yet to actually address 2 Peter 3 because you know you can't.

So, once again, Craigie asserts that Judas preached the gospel/good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV.

That's stupid Craigie's satanic Preterism.

 

[God's Truth]

So, once again, Craigie asserts that Judas preached the gospel/good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV.

That's stupid Craigie's satanic Preterism.

All of Jesus' Apostles taught the good news.

 

[tetelestai]

2Peter 3:16 shows clearly that at the time Peter wrote that he was finally beginning to barely understand Paul's epistles and gospel of salvation -

MAD claims the epistle of 2 Peter is a different gospel than the epistle of Galatians.

As you pointed out, 2 Peter was written by Peter after Paul wrote Galatians.

Both epistles were written to Galatians.

Since Paul told the Galatians that if anyone preaches a different gospel, they are to be accursed, how could Peter subsequently preach a different gospel to the Galatians without being accursed?

 

[God's Truth]

Tet, it is answered in the very next verse - despite the OTHER irrefutable proofs already shown to you from Scripture. 2Peter 3:16 shows clearly that at the time Peter wrote that he was finally beginning to barely understand Paul's epistles and gospel of salvation -

How can you say something as false as that?

Peter did not write that he was finally beginning to barely understand Paul's epistles and gospel of salvation!

How dare you just make up things that are not there.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

All of Jesus' Apostles taught the good news.

There were "two" separate" messages being preached at that time;

A) The Kingdom Message.
B) The Grace Message.

If you knew how to "rightly divide" the word, you'd be privy to that truth!

 

[God's Truth]

There were "two" separate" messages being preached at that time;

A) The Kingdom Message.
B) The Grace Message.

If you knew how to "rightly divide" the word, you'd be privy to that truth!

Those messages are the same.

Jesus is the promised good news that came.

Jesus says he had good news. You say he did not have 'the' better news but that Paul did.

Think about the consequences if you are wrong.

 

[God's Truth]

There were "two" separate" messages being preached at that time;

A) The Kingdom Message.
B) The Grace Message.

If you knew how to "rightly divide" the word, you'd be privy to that truth!

How would you ever get that the kingdom of God being near and then within a person is not the message of grace?

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

How would you ever get that the kingdom of God being near and then within a person is not the message of grace?

Huh?

 

[God's Truth]

Huh?

You said, "There were "two" separate" messages being preached at that time;"

A) The Kingdom Message.
B) The Grace Message.


How can you get that the message of the kingdom of God being near, and then being inside us is not the grace message?

When we receive the Holy Spirit that is when we have the kingdom of God within us.

 

[john w]

All of Jesus' Apostles taught the good news.

Peter attempted to prevent the Masters death-twice. The 12 had no idea the He would die, much less be raised=it was hid from them. After the resurrection, they initially did not believe it. And yet you claim that the 12 preached:

"Good news!!!!Christ is going to die for your/our sins...be buried....raised again....Believe this good news to be saved!!"


You claim Judas preached this.


"All of Jesus' Apostles taught the good news."-Silly Goose

You've yet to show where any of the 12 ever preached the good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, after being asked over 50 times. Again, Show us, prior to the dbr, where the 12 ever preached:


"Good news!!!!Christ is going to die for your/our sins...be buried....raised again....Believe this good news to be saved!!"

Chapter, verse.

You won't, as it was hid from the 12. You deny that, and that Luke 18 KJV should be in the bible.


Fraud.