Oh, the institute is KNOWN.
What do you mean by institute ?
And who determines that he is ‘just’?
What determines a judge is a what determines he's "just" like any other nation on earth, his acts and its acceptance in the society. and of course his intelligence and ability in the law.
So, other men decide if the woman deserves a divorce or not. Woman has no say so in the procedure.
No, the "wise" is not defined in gender, firstly, secondly if all of this procedures (which are the same whether who wants divorce is the man or the woman) didn't work out for the woman she goes to the judge or and tell him about the problem and her tries and he then divorce her forcefully, even if her husband doesn't accept, the only side that might look like as against female in the system is the "Esma" part where a man can divorce without going to a judge while the woman can't, and thus most people give the "Esma" right to their wives in the marriage contract before marrying. which is no against Sharia but recommended, and you know before anything there's after woman a full tribe to defend her and a father and brothers, so don't expect it to be an easy job to make woman a "slave" under your hand. especially in our communities. because it is not the woman you are marrying but a full tribe behind her to defend her rights.
Now we also need essence, when before was only in the name of Allah.
ambiguous.
No, the reason the Roman Catholic Church waited 200 years was because they hoped that they could reason with the Muslim religion and understanding that there is no reasoning with the Muslim religion, they got tired of all the atrocities the Muslims were doing to the pilgrims, their churches, their crosses, etc., and took action and crusaded against the Muslims.
You say that they wanted to crusade Jerusalem because it is a christian land taken by muslims, Ok so it is not a Jewish land as the other one was trying to convince me 5 pages ago which make you choose between the next :
1- The Imperial pope who tried to crusade Jerusalem is a real chrisitan and thinks Jerusalem is a Christian right and you are wrong as Jewish Chrisitans in giving the Jews that right.
2- The Imperial pope is wrong and you are right.
3- The Imperial pope was trying to conquer the land not for a prophecy but for imperial gain.
if it is one, then your defense about Jews and atheist Israel should be withdrawn, and you must explicitly say it is NOT a jewish right. and then we can speak about history.
it it is two, then this Imperial pope was not a good christian and indeed doesn't have the authority to re-gain a right, that is not his land nor his religion to even defend, and the jews (who are supposedly the right people) were fighting with muslims against Christians, which means it was righteous for muslims to have the land with their jewish allies.
it is three, which is against your hypothesis.
each one of these three means you have a fault in your theory.
I know exactly what you were saying and I repeat myself, we can stop talking.
I again say, I said you not we.
Thank you.
Thanks all for Allah.
That is why if a person does not say the Muslim creed, their head is chopped off, or maybe just their hands, or feet, etc.
ambiguous.
Not true and you know it. The Voice of the Martyrs and The Barnabas Fund have collected hundreds of stories, updated daily, of infidels who are mistreated or even murdered without any repercussion for the Muslim murderer. Yet, Muslims still play the “victim” card whenever they can.
Pedestrians killing other pedestrians under weak governments, nothing to do with Theology.
In the internet group forums at gawaher.com one comment reads: “the kafirs’ (unbelievers) have been attacking Muslim countries killing Muslim people from the beginning of time…when we have done nothing. Like the people of Israel attack the Muslims from Palestine because they do it for the land and because they hate Arabs/Muslims…we defend them for Allah. We try and spread Islam. The one and only true word of Allah. THEY REJECTED IT; therefore we are ALLOWED to KILL THEM (kafirs). It is NOT forbidden to kill a kafir. Of course, we want to by the will of Allah, peacefully live with them and teach them about the beautiful religion.”
So you are now trying to make a some reply for a cyber unknown person as an evidence against me ? I am sure he's either Qaeda or not scientist because he's lacking right syllogism in his own comment, he's not even mentally right to even be an evidence, so please notice. And he's right IN ONE TERM (not all of them) if the unbelievers start a war against muslims, whoever they are, they would be indeed enemies of Islam, but the problem that there's no country of Islam that have defined Sharia law so it can be defended, which makes the one in the comment not-knowledgeable of simple "Imara" (political) Fiqh.
Only Islam has such a long-standing historical tradition of beheading with even, specific commandments recorded in its ‘holy book’ to “strike off their necks” (Qur'an 47:4).
Okay, I am having war with swords, am I supposed to kill people with shotguns or behead them ?
and then "their" in the verse is meant for Jews of Medina who made an alliance with polytheists telling them that "a polytheist is better than a Muslim" so 2 verses before this verse it was talking about this idiotic move for Jews who were living in the middle of an Islamic city (Medina) and trying to plot the regime, it says (Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Scripture, purchasing error [in exchange for it] and wishing you would lose the way?) and after it it also talks about this jew (Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Scripture, who believe in superstition and false objects of worship and say about the disbelievers, "These are better guided than the believers as to the way"?) and the verse you put in your comment is in between of these two verse : (O you who were given the Scripture, believe in what We have sent down [to Muhammad], confirming that which is with you, before We obliterate faces and turn them toward their backs or curse them as We cursed the sabbath-breakers. And ever is the decree of Allah accomplished.) which was a very kind answer for those who were traitor of their own country, and this verse was before the war with them started by months, so you can see how Allah was trying to tell them not to be with ATHEISTS against monotheists, but they didn't want to hear, because they had reasons of money and land [like the prophecy you have] to ally with polytheists, and Allah indeed gave victory to his worshipers, and shall give them same victory against today's ATHEISTS and those who say are monotheists but ally with non-believers.
Yes, to a Muslim.
Muslims are just obliged with it, so yes.
As Muslims say that we worship the same God, I concur with you, all praise be to Jehovah the God of Israel, and His Prophet, Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God.
I have seen christian kids who also know in bible too much while 16, so not a big deal.
