Right Divider
Body part
Your "interpretation" of scripture is just anything goes. In other words, ridiculous.
ECT Great Commission
- Thread starter SaulToPaul 2
- Start date
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
His signature is a list of people who are not Dispensationalists.
This coming from someone who thinks NT writers re-prophesied OT prophecies.
Right Divider
Body part
You are like a very small child... incapable of actual logical reasoning.
BTW, Paul was a dispensationalist because God gave him one.
Right Divider
Body part
Liars always like to put words in other peoples mouthes.
Confirming that prophecies will be fulfilled is not equal to "re-prophesying".
There are a number of times in scripture where MULTIPLE prophets proclaim the SAME events. Is this re-prophesying?
You are truly clueless and incapable of having a discussion with anyone.
There was no such thing as a Dispensationalist until the mid 1800's
No NT writer quoted an OT prophecy with the purpose of the prophecy having a future fulfillment.
Over and over again in the NT, Jesus and many others quote OT prophecies to show they have been fulfilled.
NT writers quoting OT prophecies isn't the same thing multiple OT prophets giving the same prophecy.
NT writers did not quote OT prophecies because they were still yet to be fulfilled.
When NT writers quoted OT prophecies verbatim, it was to show that the OT prophecies were fulfilled and/or being fulfilled.
Confirming that an OT prophecy would be fulfilled is not the same thing as quoting it because it was fulfilled.
For example: Jesus said the following:
(Matt 24:15) “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand
Jesus told His audience that Daniel's prophecy would be fulfilled in the future when they saw standing in the holy place the abomination that causes desolation.
Notice Jesus didn't re-quote Daniel's prophecy verbatim. Jesus made it clear the prophecy still had a future fulfillment.
This language is nothing like what is found in Hebrews when the writer of Hebrews quotes Jer 31.
Right Divider
Body part
Paul!
Er, no.
Why don't you try explaining Matt 10:23:
(Matt 10:23 KJV) But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.
Give it your best shot?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Means what it says.
Yes, I know.
But you claim it doesn't mean what it says.
Why don't you explain how Matt 10:23 fits your Dispensational eschatology?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
:chuckle:
They had no intention of fulfilling Matthew 28:19 (KJV) until the LORD came a second time. And they didn't fulfill it.
Simple.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
:idunno:
I asked you to explain Matt 10:23, not Matt 28:19
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
It means what it says. What don't you understand?
I already told you, it's both.
The gospel was preached to every nation, and the Apostles didn't finish preaching in every town of Israel before the destruction in 70AD.