Deception Station is #7 down the left on the left hand side. Can anybody prove this wrong yet?
Flat earth proven false
- Thread starter User Name
- Start date
Deception Station is #7 down the left on the left hand side. Can anybody prove this wrong yet?
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Nope.
Burden of proof lies with the OP and those who believe it.
I know nothing of Buddhism.
NOPE.
"It is a general rule that the party who alleges the affirmative of any proposition shall prove it."
-https://www.lectlaw.com/def2/o038.htm
You are asserting that the earth is flat, that the images/video provided above are fake, etc. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you to prove it.
NOT THE POINT. Do you reject that a Buddhist's claim that 1+1=3 is wrong based on the fact that he's a Buddhist, or because 1+1 does not equal 3?
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
The image was computer generated.
Reality proves it.
If you have a point, by all means get on with it.
Repeated assertion does not make the assertion true. Another logical fallacy, "proof by (repeated) assertion."
"Reality" has nothing to do with the onus being on you to prove that the images/video are CGI, which you still have yet to do.
So you are unable to answer a question unless there's a point to it?
Just answer the question and we can move on.
The proof is in the OP.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
¸.•´¸.•*¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.•´ .•´ ¸¸.•¨¯`•.•:*¨¨*:•..•:*¨¨*:•..•:*¨¨*:•..•...
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
If you can't see something as simple as the image being CGI, you and I have nowhere to move on to.
Yes, your appeal to magic while denying fairly basic science is just what the conspiracy theory calls for in this case.
Keep up the good work.
Stuart
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
The irony.
The utter stupidity.
The indoctrination. The denial of reality.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
There is a boat load of common sense evidence pointing toward a flat plane...more than a curved surface. If anyone should be wearing tin foil hats, it's them.
There is a boat load of common sense evidence pointing toward a flat plane...more than a curved surface. If anyone should be wearing tin foil hats, it's them.
Common sense is one of the most uncommon things in the universe.
There is a boat load of common sense evidence pointing toward a flat plane...more than a curved surface. If anyone should be wearing tin foil hats, it's them.
Try reading the OP.
Why strive to believe in something that you have no evidence for?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Flat earthers have lots of questions about how airplanes can work on a spinning spherical earth, that they seem to think cannot be answered. Well of course these questions are based on misconceptions, and are easy to answer, when you understand some simple scientific principles, and the physical forces involved. Here are the common flat earth airplane questions addressed in this video.
1. Why does it take the same time to fly east as it does west if the earth is spinning at 1000 mph?
2. How can a plane land going north or south, if the earth is spinning sideways at 1000 mph?
3. Why doesn’t a plane have to dip it’s nose to follow the curve of the earth?
4. Why did a plane flying from Taiwan to Los Angeles make an emergency landing in Alaska?
5. Why do all intercontinental flights in the southern hemisphere make “fueling stops” in the northern hemisphere?
6. How can gyroscopic artificial horizons work if the plane is curving around the earth? Why don’t they roll backwards?
Here is the video in which these questions are answered:
1. Why does it take the same time to fly east as it does west if the earth is spinning at 1000 mph?
2. How can a plane land going north or south, if the earth is spinning sideways at 1000 mph?
3. Why doesn’t a plane have to dip it’s nose to follow the curve of the earth?
4. Why did a plane flying from Taiwan to Los Angeles make an emergency landing in Alaska?
5. Why do all intercontinental flights in the southern hemisphere make “fueling stops” in the northern hemisphere?
6. How can gyroscopic artificial horizons work if the plane is curving around the earth? Why don’t they roll backwards?
Here is the video in which these questions are answered:
| = | |
Cosmology is not science intentionally. It's all a large bunch of theories. No proof of a flying spinning ball shape earth has EVER been proven let alone observed. No evidence. What, pray tell is your evidence? Videos?
According to YOUR model, the sun would be 1.72 million miles away from an observer when the sun is only 1 degree above the horizon (based on a 3000 mile height), yet it is overhead for people in other locations on the earth at the same time, and wouldn't even be visible (based on a 62 mile diameter) at that distance, because for the human eye to even see a speck at that distance, an object would have to be 320.436 miles wide.
The math is evidence against your model.
This coming from someone who posts videos left and right to "prove" his position...
How ironic.