I don't have time to look at all these. A cursory examination reveals just how bad Dr. Brown's "science" is.
1)"The Theory of Organic Evolution Is Invalid." The page said, "Organic Evolution Has Never Been Observed". Brown defined organic evolution as, "naturally occurring, beneficial change that produces increasing and inheritable complexity." This is incorrect. The lactase gene produces increasing and inheritable complexity. It evolved under laboratory conditions. This was done in the 80s.
2) "The Law of Biogenesis". The page states, "The theory of evolution conflicts with this scientific law when claiming that life came from nonliving matter through natural processes."
Incorrect, again. The theory does not state this. I checked the author's source, and it had nothing to do with evolution stating this. This is blatantly wrong.
3) Brown states, "While almost all evolutionists agree that acquired characteristics cannot be inherited, many unconsciously slip into this false belief. On occasion, Darwin did." He cites no support for the fact that
modern evolutionists slip into this false belief. It is true that Darwin did, but at the time there was no model for inheritance.
I clicked randomly on "Complex Molecules and Organs". I was greeted with, "Many molecules necessary for life, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins, are so incredibly complex that claims they evolved are questionable. Furthermore, those claims lack experimental support.". I checked the source on this reference, which was “There has never been a meeting, or a book, or a paper on details of the evolution of complex biochemical systems.” Michael J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box (New York: The Free Press, 1996), p. 179.
Behe is wrong (as demonstrated in court)
If you use Dr. Brown as a scientific resource, you might want to check out
this book. It should be right up your ally.
