Creation vs. Evolution

Status
Not open for further replies.

MichaelCadry

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Michael, anyone can have a catharsis and believe it is divinely inspired.

I would be more inclined to believe you about your visions (which I have not seen) if you were accurately reporting the things I can see. I hope you can see the logic of my reasoning there, and the wisdom involved. Jesus even touches on that subject in the Gospel.


Dear noguru,

I did not have a catharsis. I had a miracle, a rare thing happened. You'll not find out I'm telling the truth until after I die. That's how it works. The prophets were taunted and disdained during their lifetimes, and as it is with paintings (like Rembrandt, Van Gogh, etc.), after their death is when they are believed, if what they said comes true. That's when what they wrote will be helpful in the present for them. I guess if I were one of the two witnesses that are written about in Rev. 11:3, you'd believe that I'm the Internet Prophet poster. I can't help it that I experienced all the things that I have, at the same time that the computer is at it's height. Thanks be to God, for the Internet, that I can reach others with the Good News!!

Much Respect For You,

Michael

:confused: :think:
 

MichaelCadry

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Biblically speaking: Creation is proof of the creator.

The problem is, evolutionists want to invent their own creator instead of getting to know Him through His word.


Dear Stripe,

Excellent!! That says it ALL in a nutshell. Just wonderful!! God tells us right in His Word that He created and made everything, so why search for some other story?? He said He stretched out the heaven. What more is necessary?

Thanks, Stripe, And May The Lord Bless You For Your Wisdom!!!

Michael
 

MichaelCadry

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Dear Noguru,


PART ONE


The 3rd angel that visited me told me about the things that follow. The Lord also helped me to understand certain things, or else I would not know them. The 3rd angel that visited me said, "Do not follow after the beast and his image, nor receive his mark in your right hand or forehead." And the angel told me that this man would also urge others to acquire these powers or abilities and God would not allow more than six hundred sixty six other people to receive these abilities. (See Rev. chapter 13). And they could 'buy or sell' these powers to other friends, etc. And the angel said, "Let him who hath understand count the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666. The angel said that this number was like the number of followers to a leader, or the number of the army men to a captain. Do you understand at all?

Now, as far as the whore/beast mentioned of in Rev. 17:5, the Lord told me that the seven kings were the seven deadly sins, which are kings with the devil for a time. Not literal kings, but spiritual kings of sins. Now the 10 horns are the seven kings/deadly sins, plus three more, additional sins of the devil that are newer. Drugs may be one of them, fornication may be another (I'm not talking about adultery here), and the other could POSSIBLY be smoking cigs, or allowing gay marriage. Both are nearly impossible to quit. Quite definitely highly improbable to the point of sheer torture. I'm not saying either way, because I can't say for sure. I don't have ALL of the answers ALL of the time. I'm not God, nor Jesus. But I do tell you that I know what I'm talking about and what I was told, I am writing, and what I was not told, I am letting you know that also, just so there is no question later.

The little horn that comes up is the Antichrist, who comes up with a mouth speaking great things. And he deceives people with mental telepathy and negativity, and accusations (See Rev. 12:10). A very GREAT sin that is running rampant in the earth right now. The angels had a very hard time with it, so don't think it's a piece of cake. It will be very difficult for us on earth to do the same as the angels did, but you'll make it if you persist. And the Antichrist's name is Uri Geller, and he is an Israeli psychic who could do great wonders that others couldn't do normally, but only by sleight-of-hand. So when he came doing his silver spoon bending, the magicians did it too. Now Uri had asked his teacher if Jesus could do miracles like the ones he did. I don't know what the teacher said, but I know what the angel said to me and that's that he was the Antichrist. Now a while afterwards, since Uri's believability was damaged by the magicians (especially The Amazing Randi) and that was Uri's deadly wound, a French man (False Prophet) came being able to do the same things as Uri, and the scientists started to wonder about it all and did many tests. But Uri's fame waned, just like the 'little horn'. (See Dan. 7:8). But the French psychic caused Uri Geller's wound to heal. (See Rev. 13:12, 17:8) "...when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is." Those whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world will be faced with this dilemma. (See same verse).

I'm just being as honest as I can. I could make things up, but I'd get clobbered by God. And the horns and heads that you see on the beast and whore are 'kings' of the devil. And the woman which you saw is that great CITY, which reigns over the kings of the earth. (See Rev. 17:18). Word for word. The CITY is Hollywood. This is what was TOLD to me. Where the girls and guys too, line the streets trying to be prostitutes for money, just like in Babylon. The angel told me that Hollywood was spiritually like ancient Babylon. They've been caught up in a bad situation. They go there for fame or money, and find out they can't afford a place to even stay or even food to eat, and there are no jobs, so they sell themselves out of lack of choice. And it's Hollywood doing all of this, teaching all of the world through it's movies, games, magazines, books, TV shows, music, etc., all kind of evil ways and the earth thinks, because they see them on TV, they should be that way or imitate them. Only those who don't have a sane head on their shoulders. It's awful. And Hollywood is going to get clobbered with a huge earthquake. But there will be one bigger than that which will occur before the Hollywood earthquake, and it shall be such a great earthquake that has ever been since man has been on the earth. You shall hear of it, or be in it. I have a strong idea of where it will be, but I will keep it to myself because every little mistake I make, I've got to pay for. So I will speak only of those things which I know as fact from now on.

Oh, I could tell you SO many things, but I have to type forever. Sometimes, the things I tell you here are not even in my book, because it's easier over the days and days to explain myself. For myself, I know that 3 kings are fallen, namely, I quit being gay or masturbating (bear with me) or thinking about sex. I abstain and I'm glad I do it. I do like women that way, but I cannot have sex with one. See Rev. 11:4. I must remain a virgin with WOMEN. It has not been easy and it's been a rough life with everyone wondering why I don't have a family and children, and a 2nd or 3rd wife. I'd have to be tied down by a wife and family. That's a sin right there that I don't have to worry about. Plus, I quit smoking cigs after 40 years! One of the hardest things I've done. It took a few efforts before I got it done for good. I've also quit drinking so much beer, and now I think it tastes terrible. I hardly ever drink now. Maybe a bottle of wine in a month. A a couple glasses on Passover. Yes, I make my own homemade Matzoh Bread.

No, I am a witness for God, bearing my testimony in front of the Judge, bearing what I have seen and heard from Him, the angels, the Holy Ghost, visions, and angels. I've been blessed so GREATLY for this happening, but it has not come with a HUGE PRICE. I have paid dearly mentally and spiritually for the information I have, and Satan trying his best to shut me up. And he tries EXTREMELY hard. He does not want me to tell all of my experiences to others, because they will be saved and they will become immune to him and his demons. There's a lot for him to lose if he doesn't come out a winner. He won't because God is more powerful than him and it is written that the Lord God plays with him as a little bird. So God IS in charge, nevertheless.


PART TWO

And the False Prophet's name is Jean-Pierre Girard and he was at the Stanford Research Institute in CA, showing the scientists there that he displayed the same powers as Uri Geller did. And because of what he was doing and because it was done to fulfill the scriptures, the False Prophet 'caused' God to send down lightning where he was and it was done to fulfill Rev. 13:13, "And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men; And deceived them that dwell on earth 'by the means of' those miracles which he had the power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak...."

I know that was very lengthy for a quote. Please hang in there. The newspaper had printed a big picture of Uri's head on one page and had an article that came with the photo (image). And the article that came with the photo was how the image/he was able to speak. I hope you can understand this. It said in the article to put your silverware, broken watches, compasses and small appliances on the large image of his picture in the paper. Then, during the week, on Wed., Uri would fly over the U.S. and see how many people over the whole U.S. who had read the article and put their objects on his photo had anything happen. Well, people wrote in that they had bent silverware, and watches working again, and small appliances working again when they were broken, etc. (See Rev. 13:15).

See Dan. 9:27, "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week; and in the midst (Wed.) of the week he shall cause the" abomination of desolation to be set up.' See also Dan. 11:38. "But in His estate (in place of God) he shall acknowledge a God of forces: and a god whom his fathers never knew shall he honor with gold (watches), silver (silver spoons), and with precious stones (in watches, diamonds, sapphires, etc.), and pleasant things (compasses, small appliances)." The compasses he would hold his hands around them and cause the needle to move on them. It's all done by the devil and electromagnetic force, but it is allowed to Satan, and that is the only reason it is possible, because it is allowed from God above so the devil will have a chance to have someone like Jesus come doing miracles, so the people would follow him/the false prophet. I know I haven't explained this superbly, but I do hope you all understand it, and can read the Bible Scriptures I give and read them in the Bible and the verses that are before and after them. Then, you will understand.

So much is already fulfilled and you all don't know it already. There's just about nothing left to do yet. I could tell you other secrets, but I cannot for certain reasons. You certainly might as well know what's going on around you and realize it's just so Satan can have a chance to have a man doing miracles, just like God had Jesus down here before doing miracles. It is the devil's hope that you all begin to believe in aliens and other worlds, and that we come from them and not created by God like it says in the Bible. Just for an example, I have a friend who is totally mesmerized with something called the Urantia Books/Pages and they are about other worlds and heavens, and universes (seven of them). It's just ridiculous. And he even has a few followers. What he has is not even a religion. It is a perverse way of thinking about someone Holy, namely Our God in Heaven. And he's getting away with it. And his few followers believe in it all also. They are in their own little world, as evil as it is, and they don't even know it. It sure isn't God giving them the way they believe in. Well, I must go for now. God Bless You EACH and EVERY ONE!! He loves those who seek Him. I've explained this in the best way I can. Well, you all. Any questions, just feel free to ask. Keep a good head on your shoulders and a sane, smart mind and loving heart.

May God Make All Of Your Dreams Come To Fruition,

Michael
 
Last edited:

DavisBJ

New member
Dear BJ,

I don't want anyone to buy my book. Why do you think I offered it Free online?
I said “buy or download”. You know what buy is, like at Barnes and Noble where you informed us it can be purchased for a modest sum? And you know what download is? I explicitly told you the first time I posted to you that I had downloaded, and read it. Sheesh.
I'm sorry that we don't get along better. I get along with almost everyone on this TOL website. But you don't want to so what can I say?
Precisely, you hit the nail on the head. Let’s see what it really means when you say something. (I told noguru that I would tone down my comments to you dealing with your inability to differentiate reality from illusion. That closed the door on my pointing out a number of surreal comments you have made.) But treating you just as a normal person, there are still some evident issues that should be noted.

In early January, noguru must have said something to the effect that this thread seems to be largely a vehicle for you to publicize your book. You acknowledged noguru’s feelings, and said:
Dear noguru,

That's the last time I will mention how to get my book on this thread. I didn't know it bugged you that much, but I can tone it down. Michael
Noguru politely thanked you for that:
OK, Michael that is much appreciated. I have to admit that you have grown on me, since I first started reading your posts. … Peace Brother
But unfortunately, as has happened over and over in this thread, you dishonored your promise within a few weeks:
… Dear All,

If you'd like a FREE copy of my book, go to the link below: (www.jesusreturningverysoon.com, then click on 'Book Copy', then SKU-text.pdf and …
This is not a matter of fuzziness between reality and imagination on your part, this is a consistent pattern of willful dishonesty.

You want to be friends? At least make a token effort to show your word means something. Quit sating your need to inject your comments into huge numbers of conversations that you only distract from. You have made your point over and over and over again that soon us atheists are going to be in deep doo doo. Fine, you have made the threat, now act like a real friend and lay off it. Capisce?
 

Mark SeaSigh

BANNED
Banned
Looks Like Davis really is a BJ.

=M=

Bet you never heard that one before, Eh Davis?

=======================================

I like your book Michael!!! I'm not done Reading it Yet, but I'm working on it.

=======================================

Maybe old BJ, doesn't realize that this is Michael's Thread, and if he wanted to make a Post about Poodles Doing Hand Stands, then he Can.

BJ, instead of meaningless things, why don't you try to Say more Meaningful things, which are Related to the Subject.

For instance, since you believe that Man looked like an Ape 3.2 Million years ago, why don't you go find some Proof of it, and Post it?

=======================================

And now, a Word from Evolution Tale;

ALgae? Vid Date Mar 23, 2014
 
Last edited:

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
I wonder where they found someone who can do a cultured, semi-British accent, who doesn't know how to pronounce "algae."
http://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/pronunciation/british/algae

The first plant cell was the result of endosymbiosis, the union of a photosynthetic bacterium with a eukaryotic cell. BTW, "blue green algae" are not algae at all, but bacteria, i.e. prokaryotes. The algae depicted in the video are eukaryotes; organisms with cell nucleii.

So is there any evidence for this endosymbiosis as the origin of plants? Turns out, there is. The chloroplasts within an algae cell are essentially cyanobacteria, with their own circular bacterial DNA, and they reproduce independently of the plant cell in which they live.

Is there any evidence that such an endosymbiotic event can happen? Turns out there is.

Bacterial endosymbiosis in amoebae.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14732171

Any ignoramus can make a video. Which is what happened it this case.
 

Mark SeaSigh

BANNED
Banned
Well, you sound Smart, but I'm going to go with, "you're not Really"; considering you are a Catholic, Named Barbarian.

Furthermore, You missed the Point of the Video.

The Point is, that These Organisms are supposed to Have Remained Unchanged for 3 Billion Years.

That Proves that the Theory of Evolution, is Wrong. When you consider that the Theory of Evolution States that Organisms Change through Mutations Over Time. Why have All the Algae Remained Unchanged up to Present Day?

=M=

Which was the Whole point of the Video; Not that I believe you when you Say that a Cell that Allows Photosynthesis to take place, can Happen over time Through Small Mutations to the DNA of the Organism.
 

Mark SeaSigh

BANNED
Banned
Here is A Question, for the Barbarian Catholic;

If you believe the Biblical Work, How can you Also Believe in Evolution; Given that the Biblical Work Says God Made Adam in One Day?


I'm guessing that you claim to believe the Bible, because you have a Religion that is Supposed to be Based on the Bible, Right?

Or, Are the Catholics completely Ignoring their Own Holy Book?

=M=
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
Well, you sound Smart,

The guy in your video sounds smart, too. But as you see, he's a complete nitwit, who has no idea what he's talking about.

but I'm going to go with, "your not Really", considering you are a Catholic, Named Barbarian.

Funny how I got that name. I was debating with a rather aggressive atheist, who finally (like you) abandoned any attempt at a rational argument, and told me I had no idea how "barbaric" Christianity is. So I suggested he call me a barbarian from then on. The other atheists thought it was funny, but he didn't. And that's where it started.

Of course Catholics are accustomed to hostility from various sects; He told us the world would hate us, and some of you do.

Furthermore, You missed the Point of the Video.

I assumed the point of the video was to present accurate information. Clearly, I got that wrong.

The Point is, that These Organisms are supposed to Have Remained Unchanged for 3 Billion Years.

I don't know any species of algae that goes back even 50 million years, much less three billion. Plants didn't even exist back then. Some cyanobacteria (what your guy thinks are algae) did exist, but again, no evidence for any modern species from that time. What do you have?

That Proves that the Theory of Evolution, is Wrong.

You seem to have out a few steps in your proof. Can you try again?

Which was the Whole point of the Video; Not that I believe you when you Say that a Cell that Allows Photosynthesis to take place, can Happen over time Through Small Mutations to the DNA of the Organism.

See the link. Endosymbiosis has been directly observed to happen. Can't get much more certain than that.
 

Mark SeaSigh

BANNED
Banned
The guy in your video sounds smart, too. But as you see, he's a complete nitwit, who has no idea what he's talking about.



Funny how I got that name. I was debating with a rather aggressive atheist, who finally (like you) abandoned any attempt at a rational argument, and told me I had no idea how "barbaric" Christianity is. So I suggested he call me a barbarian from then on. The other atheists thought it was funny, but he didn't. And that's where it started.

Of course Catholics are accustomed to hostility from various sects; He told us the world would hate us, and some of you do.



I assumed the point of the video was to present accurate information. Clearly, I got that wrong.



I don't know any species of algae that goes back even 50 million years, much less three billion. Plants didn't even exist back then. Some cyanobacteria (what your guy thinks are algae) did exist back then, but again, no evidence that any modern species existed back then. What do you have?



You seem to have out a few steps in your proof. Can you try again?



=M=

Which was the Whole point of the Video; Not that I believe you when you Say that a Cell that Allows Photosynthesis to take place, can Happen over time Through Small Mutations to the DNA of the Organism.

No, i will stay with that, you did miss the Point.

Do you tell that Story about how you Got your name to Everyone you Meet, or am I Special?

=M=

Do you Really believe that the Chlorophyll Molecule, Evolved?

Do you Realize How complex they are, and that the Chances of them Happening through any of the Mechanisms Included in the Theory of Evolution are Zero?

There are no Chances that Evolution could Lead to Such Complex order like what we See in the Chlorophyll Molecule.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorophyll

The Algae that he mentions had Chlorophyll from the Day it was Created.

So, Here is Your Question, Catholic Barbarian;

Does Blue Green algae Exist Today?

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/bacteria/cyanofr.html

From Wiki;

The name "cyanobacteria" comes from the color of the bacteria (Greek: κυανός (kyanós) = blue). They are often called blue-green algae, but some consider that name a misnomer as cyanobacteria are prokaryotic and algae should be eukaryotic,[4] although other definitions of algae encompass prokaryotic organisms.[5]
 
Last edited:

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
Do you Really believe that the Chlorophyll Molecule, Evolved?

There is no single chlorophyll molecule. In most plants there is an alpha and a beta form. And genetically, there is evidence for the way these evolved:

Abstract

The genome of Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. "Dare" contains a chlorophyll a/b binding (Cab) protein gene family consisting of 10 genes. The primary structures of two linked Cab genes (Cab 4 and Cab 5) were determined. A comparison of the nucleic acid and predicted amino acid sequences of Cab 4 and Cab 5 revealed a high degree of similarity (96% and 98%, respectively). Phylogenetic inferences drawn from sequence comparisons between previously characterized soybean Cab 1, 2, and 3 and Cab 4 and 5 suggested that soybean Cab 3 was an evolutionarily distant member within this family. We further investigated the molecular evolution of the Cab gene family by comparing nucleotide sequences from 25 different Cab genes representing diverse phylogenetic taxa including monocot and dicot species. Phylogenetic inferences from these data support existing morphological phylogenies in that all species within one family clustered together. These data suggested that the Solanaceae were more evolutionarily distant from the monocots than the Fabaceae and Brassicacea. In addition, these data supported the theory that Cab Type I and II genes originated prior to divergence of the monocots and dicots.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2506360

And the evidence suggests that retinol (which is a much simpler molecule, derived from fatty acids which are easily synthesized and common in all organisms) preceded chlorophyll. The archaea often use retinol, and they are most evolved to the conditions of the early earth where oxygen was mostly absent.

And we see the different versions of chlorophyll show evidence of a common origin.

So not that surprising. It is, btw, made up of two simpler molecules with a magnesium atom held in the porphyrin ring.

Do you Realize How complex they are

Take a look:

200px-Chlorophyll-c1-3D-balls.png


This one is chlorophyll c1, and it's simpler than most organic compounds. Which is not surprising since it evolved very early. Not as simple as the cell membrane, but of course that would have evolved even earlier.

and that the Chances of them Happening

Darwin's great discovery was that it doesn't happen by chance.

So, Here is Your Question, Catholic Barbarian;

Does Blue Green algae Exist Today?

That should be "Do blue green algae exist today?" "Algae" is plural.

There are an incredible number of different species of cyanobacteria (the proper name for "blue-green algae", which as you learned, are not algae at all). There is no evidence that any of the modern species existed billions of years ago. At least, I haven't see any. Do you have something showing the existence of a modern species from that time?

Your source doesn't say that, and although I haven't worked in the field for many years, I do have a degree in bacteriology, and no one had any evidence for your claim back then. And such evidence would have rocked the world of bacteriology, if such a thing happened. Keep in mind, bacteria are very small and simple, and organisms with very similar morphology will often have very different genes and physiologies. Hence, "they look the same" won't do much for identification in bacteria.
 

Mark SeaSigh

BANNED
Banned
There is no single chlorophyll molecule. In most plants there is an alpha and a beta form. And genetically, there is evidence for the way these evolved:

Abstract

The genome of Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. "Dare" contains a chlorophyll a/b binding (Cab) protein gene family consisting of 10 genes. The primary structures of two linked Cab genes (Cab 4 and Cab 5) were determined. A comparison of the nucleic acid and predicted amino acid sequences of Cab 4 and Cab 5 revealed a high degree of similarity (96% and 98%, respectively). Phylogenetic inferences drawn from sequence comparisons between previously characterized soybean Cab 1, 2, and 3 and Cab 4 and 5 suggested that soybean Cab 3 was an evolutionarily distant member within this family. We further investigated the molecular evolution of the Cab gene family by comparing nucleotide sequences from 25 different Cab genes representing diverse phylogenetic taxa including monocot and dicot species. Phylogenetic inferences from these data support existing morphological phylogenies in that all species within one family clustered together. These data suggested that the Solanaceae were more evolutionarily distant from the monocots than the Fabaceae and Brassicacea. In addition, these data supported the theory that Cab Type I and II genes originated prior to divergence of the monocots and dicots.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2506360

And the evidence suggests that retinol (which is a much simpler molecule, derived from fatty acids which are easily synthesized and common in all organisms) preceded chlorophyll. The archaea often use retinol, and they are most evolved to the conditions of the early earth where oxygen was mostly absent.

And we see the different versions of chlorophyll show evidence of a common origin.

So not that surprising. It is, btw, made up of two simpler molecules with a magnesium atom held in the porphyrin ring.



Take a look:

200px-Chlorophyll-c1-3D-balls.png


This one is chlorophyll c1, and it's simpler than most organic compounds. Which is not surprising since it evolved very early. Not as simple as the cell membrane, but of course that would have evolved even earlier.



Darwin's great discovery was that it doesn't happen by chance.



That should be "Do blue green algae exist today?" "Algae" is plural.

There are an incredible number of different species of cyanobacteria (the proper name for "blue-green algae", which as you learned, are not algae at all). There is no evidence that any of the modern species existed billions of years ago. At least, I haven't see any. Do you have something showing the existence of a modern species from that time?



http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/bacteria/cyanofr.html

Ok, then Betty,

Does Prokaryotic Blue Green Algae Still Exist Today?

=M=

I think Barbarian, Like No Guru, believes that Evolution does Happen, But it is Controlled by God; And that there is nothing Random About it.

Right, Barbie?


PS, I obviously Don't believe in Evolution. There is no Need For Evolution if God Created all the Creatures in Adult Fully Functional Form, Like the Bible Says. However, there is A Need For Mutation, and Mutation is Observable; For Instance, No Creature of the same Species Looks Alike, that is Because of Mutation through Reproduction.

However, Evolution Theorists believe that Given Enough Time, these Mutations Will Lead to a New Type of Creature, and that Eventually a Dog, will Give Birth to something that is not A Dog, They call that Speciation. Which is a Word that Still Remains Undefined, which is Why the spell check says it's Wrong, even though it's Spelled Right.

Evolutionists believe in using Undefined Terms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciation
 
Last edited:

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
Ok, then Betty,

Touchy, touchy. The first rule of debate is "don't get too upset to think."

Does Prokaryotic Blue Green Algae Still Exist Today?

That should be "Do prokaryotic blue green algae still exist today?" Plural, remember.

Algae aren't prokaryotic. The proper term is "cyanobacteria", and of course we don't have any evidence at all that the species from the Precambrian still exist. There are modern species, but they don't seem to be anything like a billion years old.
 

Mark SeaSigh

BANNED
Banned
Touchy, touchy. The first rule of debate is "don't get too upset to think."



That should be "Do prokaryotic blue green algae still exist today?" Plural, remember.

Algae aren't prokaryotic. The proper term is "cyanobacteria", and of course we don't have any evidence at all that the species from the Precambrian still exist. There are modern species, but they don't seem to be anything like a billion years old.

So, that is a Yes, they do Still Exist today!!

The Answer you are Looking For Is, "YES".

Good for You, Barbie.

=M=

Why Not?


"Her", is No Guru.
 
Last edited:

Mark SeaSigh

BANNED
Banned
Maybe if you read up on it a bit, it would be easier to figure out. Couldn't hurt.
"That should be "Do prokaryotic blue green algae still exist today?" Plural, remember."

Or, I can Say it, "Does Prokaryotic Blue Green Algae Sill Exist Today?";

If I am referring to the Type of Life known as Blue Green Algae.

=M=

Why do Evolutionists always try to Get Caught up in Errors in Other People's Grammar, when Their Grammar is Usually the Worst of All, and the Theory of Evolution has Been Put in Jeopardy?
 

noguru

Well-known member
random variation plays no role in evolution?

If many random alternatives are supplied. Yet only one or a couple of those survive to reproduce in mass because of environmental factors. How would you describe the entire process, random or selective?
 

noguru

Well-known member
Maybe if you read up on it a bit, it would be easier to figure out. Couldn't hurt.

Markseemshigh would rather not thoroughly understand the subject he is discussing. If he understood it thoroughly he would have to find another place for his "God of the gaps".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top