Right Divider
Body part
If you want to talk about the real Jesus instead of your fairy tale one... sure.
Acts 2:34
- Thread starter oatmeal
- Start date
If you want to talk about the real Jesus instead of your fairy tale one... sure.
God's Truth
New member
You say what Jesus says when he walked the earth wasn't to us!
Right Divider
Body part
I did not say that. You lie once again. Does God like habitual lying?
Some of what Jesus said was universally applicable and some was not. Problem is, you cannot tell the difference.
God's Truth
New member
You sure are twisty. Okay then, was what Jesus said for us but not to us; or to us but not for us?
lol!
Right Divider
Body part
Besides your lying ways, you are also childish and immature.
God's Truth
New member
Come on you know you get it mixed up yourself. HA! You say it one way and then when I say what you say you change it the other way. Either way, it is wrong.
oatmeal
Well-known member
To be honest, you yourself have taught me not to value your words, for your words clearly contradict God's words
Should you ever start stating God's words, then you will begin to gain some credibility with me.
Right Divider
Body part
You're lying again... what a surprise.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
It doesn't say "David's Lord", either, you liar.
I did not say that it says "YHWH the Son"; I said that, in the verse, we have YHWH the Father saying something to YHWH the Son.
Oh, also, notice that you for some reason chose to not point out that it also does not say "YHWH the Father", nor "God the Father". Why did you not also complain about the phrase I used--"YHWH the Father"--ya hypocrite?
God's Truth
New member
You are lost and I couldn't care any less about having credibility with you. You don't even know Jesus is the Christ. You said Jesus isn't living in you.
God's Truth
New member
Come on you know you get it mixed up yourself. HA! You say it one way and then when I say what you say you change it the other way. Either way, it is wrong.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Well, I wouldn't go quite that far. However, I do agree with you that adsqo4q34b n05b 43b0q0vr, so perhaps you're on the right track. I'm curious, though: Strrrerwhklickickicku7uut thrithrith? Yes or No?
Greetings again 7djengo7,
Psalm 110 (KJV): A Psalm of David
1 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
Matthew 22:41–45 (KJV): 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
Kind regards
Trevor
The quality of your posts seem to be deteriorating and you then also resort to abuse. Psalm 110 is a Psalm of David and he calls Jesus “my Lord” in other words as I stated Jesus, the Son of God is in truth David’s Lord, no lie.
Psalm 110 (KJV): A Psalm of David
1 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
Matthew 22:41–45 (KJV): 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
Kind regards
Trevor
Right Divider
Body part
You're lying again... what a surprise.... NOT!
God's Truth
New member
It means nothing different, 'for', 'to'.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Here, you're playing stupid. You're continuing in your lie. Here is what you wrote:
Obviously, in Psalm 110:1, David is talking about David's Lord. But that's not what you're saying, here. You're saying that Psalm 110:1 says the phrase, "David's Lord". Because of your Satanic guile, you chose to not put quotes around the phrase, "David's Lord", as you put quotes around the phrase, "YHWH the Son".
Notice the difference:
- Except it does not say "YHWH the Son", but [it says] David's Lord.
- Except it does not say "YHWH the Son", but [it says] "David's Lord".
David's Lord is not something that can be said, whereas the phrase, "David's Lord", is something that can be said. So, whereas David, in Psalm 110:1, speaks about his Lord--about David's Lord--he, therein, neither says David's Lord, nor the phrase, "David's Lord".
You can say the phrase, "Mt Rushmore", but you can't say Mt Everest; Mt Everest is not something you can say, but it is something that can be climbed.
You can say the phrase, "potato salad", but you can't say potato salad; potato salad is not something you can say, but it is something that can be eaten.
You can say the phrase, "David's Lord", but you can't say David's Lord. David's Lord is not something you can say, but is someone Who can raise people from the dead.
You're not as stupid as you're trying to let on like. Rather, you're a liar. By stating the truth, that you are a liar, I'm not resorting to abuse; it's not abuse to state the truth; in saying that you are a liar, I'm resorting to stating the truth about you.
You can say the phrase, "Mt Rushmore", but you can't say Mt Everest; Mt Everest is not something you can say, but it is something that can be climbed.
You can say the phrase, "potato salad", but you can't say potato salad; potato salad is not something you can say, but it is something that can be eaten.
You can say the phrase, "David's Lord", but you can't say David's Lord. David's Lord is not something you can say, but is someone Who can raise people from the dead.
You're not as stupid as you're trying to let on like. Rather, you're a liar. By stating the truth, that you are a liar, I'm not resorting to abuse; it's not abuse to state the truth; in saying that you are a liar, I'm resorting to stating the truth about you.
Greetings again 7dengo7,
Kind regards
Trevor
The reason why I wrote David's Lord and not "David's Lord" is because it actually says "my Lord", but as this is David speaking or writing it is David's Lord. Yes, obvious, but you like to play with words and not communicate correctly.
Kind regards
Trevor
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
You did not write David's Lord. David's Lord is not something you can write. The phrase, "David's Lord", is something you can write. You wrote the phrase, "David's Lord", and erroneously chose to not put the phrase in quotes.
David, in Psalm 110:1, wrote the phrase, "my Lord". David neither wrote David's Lord, nor the phrase, "David's Lord".
You're a Satanic liar. I will pray for you.
Greetings again 7dengo7,
Kind regards
Trevor
I did write David's Lord. Would you have been happier if I had said David's "Lord". I was objecting to your introduction of the phrase "YHWH the Son", a phrase or title that is not found in the Scriptures and especially cannot be deducted from Psalm 110:1..
Kind regards
Trevor
oatmeal
Well-known member
Thanks for the question.
It seems to get to the heart of the matter.
in reply, my best answer is dghkyte$&+868)-22srgb.