What can be done to prevent future voter fraud?

marke

Well-known member
1. Require voter IDs whether potential crooks like it or not.
2. Eliminate extended periods of days or weeks following an election to allow biased precinct workers to 'find' more votes.
3. Eliminate mail-in balloting that is not tied to voter IDs that can be checked against all votes nationwide in any single election.
4. Allow equal democrat and republican access to voting computers as well as opening up details to impartial investigators if questions arise.
5. Have incorruptible paper document trails to verify vote choices in voting machine ballots.
6. Do not allow secret counting of ballots and instill cameras in places where votes are counted.
7. Remove unsecured ballot drop boxes to prevent illegal ballot harvesting.
8. Do not allow persons to collect multiple ballots from voters to be turned in without verification of validity.

And possibly more restrictions. Had these provisions been in place in the 2020 election there likely would never have any situation arisen that caused so many Americans to question the validity of hundreds of thousands of unverifiable ballots.
 

marke

Well-known member
1. Require voter IDs whether potential crooks like it or not.
2. Eliminate extended periods of days or weeks following an election to allow biased precinct workers to 'find' more votes.
3. Eliminate mail-in balloting that is not tied to voter IDs that can be checked against all votes nationwide in any single election.
4. Allow equal democrat and republican access to voting computers as well as opening up details to impartial investigators if questions arise.
5. Have incorruptible paper document trails to verify vote choices in voting machine ballots.
6. Do not allow secret counting of ballots and instill cameras in places where votes are counted.
7. Remove unsecured ballot drop boxes to prevent illegal ballot harvesting.
8. Do not allow persons to collect multiple ballots from voters to be turned in without verification of validity.

And possibly more restrictions. Had these provisions been in place in the 2020 election there likely would never have any situation arisen that caused so many Americans to question the validity of hundreds of thousands of unverifiable ballots.
Let's examine the facts. Tens of millions of Americans are begging Congress to strengthen securities in voting in order to close the existing windows that remain open to the possibility that crooks may commit hard to detect voter fraud and get away with it without getting caught. However, democrats put up strong opposition to blocking avenues of fraud and then condemn good Americans for suggesting democrats commit voter fraud and will do everything possible to protect those avenues of fraud. Democrats are being unreasonable.

If democrats claim they did not commit fraud in 2020 then let them prove they did not commit relatively undetectable voter fraud by helping prevent the possibility of voting fraud in future elections.
 

marke

Well-known member
Democrats admit voter fraud is hard to detect and uncover, but they claim they did not commit fraud in 2020 even though they fight like hell to keep lawmakers from making elections more secure against the possibility of fraud. Americans who measure democrat obstruction to voting security against unverified democrat claims they committed no fraud in 2020 can only conclude that democrats quite possibly committed fraud and did not get caught and do not want laws established to make it hard for them to commit fraud in the future.
 

marke

Well-known member
Democrats admit voter fraud is hard to detect and uncover, but they claim they did not commit fraud in 2020 even though they fight like hell to keep lawmakers from making elections more secure against the possibility of fraud. Americans who measure democrat obstruction to voting security against unverified democrat claims they committed no fraud in 2020 can only conclude that democrats quite possibly committed fraud and did not get caught and do not want laws established to make it hard for them to commit fraud in the future.
Why else would democrats not support strengthening securities to make voter fraud harder to commit without getting caught?
 

PureX

Well-known member
Wow, and no mention at all of ending gerrymandering. Or of eliminating the electoral college. Or of stopping PAC advertising and probaganda. Or of increasing the accuracy and oversight of voter registration logs. Instead, it's all about punishing the voters by demanding that THEY prove their worthiness to vote. Which is exactly contrary to the whole point and process of democracy. No wonder this country is going to hell.
 

Right Divider

Body part
So that every citizen's vote would have an equal say in who gets elected.
That would be horrible for people in small states. They would have NO say in the matter.
The states elect the president and NOT every individual. We are the United STATES of America and NOT the United STATE of America.
 

PureX

Well-known member
That would be horrible for people in small states. They would have NO say in the matter.
They would have exactly the same say as anyone else. And to what "matter" are you referring? In a national election everyone would have the same say. State lines are irrelevant. In a state election everyone in the state would have the same say. In a local election everyone in the locality would have the same say. Why do you think small populations need special representation? The whole purpose of government is to repsesent the people. Not the 'state", or the "land", or any commercial entities.
The states elect the president and NOT every individual. We are the United STATES of America and NOT the United STATE of America.
Yeah, and that has been a mistake from the beginning. The president's job is to represent all the people of the nation, not represent all the "states" of the nation
 

Right Divider

Body part
They would have exactly the same say as anyone else. And to what "matter" are you referring? In a national election everyone would have same say. State lines are irrelevant. In a state election everyine in the state would have the same say. In a local election everyone in the locality would have the same say.
🤪
Why do you think small populations need special representation?
Because the majority should not be able to abuse the minority If we used a single popular vote, a candidate would only have to campaign in CA, NY, IL, FL, TX (and maybe a couple of others)... they could simply ignore the rest of the country... so much for "every vote counting".
The whole purpose of government is to repsesent the people. Not the 'state", or the "land", or any commercial entities.
We have 50 governments to be concerned with. Consolidated power is always the most corrupt.
Yeah, and that has been a mistake from the beginning.
You are truly an unthinking moron. Sorry to have to be the one to break the bad news.
 
Top