can you identify the king of the south?
The belief that the great tribulation is the last 7 years of the 490 year prophecy in Daniel is the wrong one.Your belief that these past two millenia are the great tribulation is unique and wrongheaded.
Try reading Leviticus.The 6 things were not things Israel had to do, or could do. ONly God can atone
Leviticus 9:7 7 And Moses said unto Aaron, Go unto the altar, and offer thy sin offering, and thy burnt offering, and make an atonement for thyself, and for the people: and offer the offering of the people, and make an atonement for them; as the Lord commanded. |
You are assuming that the word עוֹלָם only means everlasting in the way that only God can make it., only God can bring in everlasting righteousness.
Leviticus 3:17 17 It shall be a perpetual statute for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood. |
can you identify the king of the south?
The belief that the great tribulation is the last 7 years of the 490 year prophecy in Daniel is the wrong one.
I have carefully studied what the Old Testament declares to be the fate of the children of Israel, and the great tribulation of the children of Israel have gone through in the last 1950 years matches every point.
Try reading Leviticus.
Here is a sample:
Leviticus 9:7
7 And Moses said unto Aaron, Go unto the altar, and offer thy sin offering, and thy burnt offering, and make an atonement for thyself, and for the people: and offer the offering of the people, and make an atonement for them; as the Lord commanded.
You are assuming that the word עוֹלָם only means everlasting in the way that only God can make it.
That is not the only way the word is used in the Bible.
Leviticus 3:17
17 It shall be a perpetual statute for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood.
Perpetual (everlasting) righteousness in the verse from Daniel 9 means each successive generation of the children of Israel being righteous instead of turning to wickedness.
can you identify the king of the south?
_____Antiochus was the king of the north and Ptolemy was king of the south.
DANIEL 11 - PROPHECY FULFILLED!
After much fighting and jockeying for position, Alexander's empire was divided into four major portions by 301 BCE: (1) Cassander ruled over Greece, (2) Lysimachus ruled in Asia Minor, (3) Seleucus I Nicator ruled in Babylon and Persia, and (4) Ptolemy I Soter ruled over the Holy Land and Egypt.
Twenty years later (281 BCE), when Seleucus I killed Lysimachus in battle, only two dynasties remained in Alexander's old empire – the Seleucid kings in the north and the Ptolemaic kings in the south.
In 249 BCE, king of the South Ptolemy II Philadelphus sent his daughter Berenice to king of the North Antiochus II Theos. His plan was to stop the war that was raging (the Second Syrian War) and unite the two kingdoms through their marriage. Unfortunately, this plan had a flaw: Antiochus II was already married. However, because he knew his marriage to Ptolemy II's daughter would ensure peace and allow him to regain most of the Syrian possessions his father had lost to the king of the South, Antiochus II put away his wife Laodice and married Berenice. She persuaded him to reject Laodice's children and set up her own to succeed him on the throne.
_____
_____Antiochus was the king of the north and Ptolemy was king of the south.
DANIEL 11 - PROPHECY FULFILLED!
After much fighting and jockeying for position, Alexander's empire was divided into four major portions by 301 BCE: (1) Cassander ruled over Greece, (2) Lysimachus ruled in Asia Minor, (3) Seleucus I Nicator ruled in Babylon and Persia, and (4) Ptolemy I Soter ruled over the Holy Land and Egypt.
Twenty years later (281 BCE), when Seleucus I killed Lysimachus in battle, only two dynasties remained in Alexander's old empire – the Seleucid kings in the north and the Ptolemaic kings in the south.
In 249 BCE, king of the South Ptolemy II Philadelphus sent his daughter Berenice to king of the North Antiochus II Theos. His plan was to stop the war that was raging (the Second Syrian War) and unite the two kingdoms through their marriage. Unfortunately, this plan had a flaw: Antiochus II was already married. However, because he knew his marriage to Ptolemy II's daughter would ensure peace and allow him to regain most of the Syrian possessions his father had lost to the king of the South, Antiochus II put away his wife Laodice and married Berenice. She persuaded him to reject Laodice's children and set up her own to succeed him on the throne.
_____
how do you explain mat 24:15?
Wait, wait... don't ptolemy yet... I can guess...can you identify the king of the south?
can you identify the king of the south?
Antiochus was the king of the north and Ptolemy was king of the south.
how do you explain mat 24:15?
The two topics must not be mixed. It will be incessant confusion if they are.
Revelation is about the end of the old covenant, and the bringing in the new.
Eph 3:21 Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.
Raised in Baptist and Evangelical churches, indoctrinated in Dispensational Eschatology, then I found God, studied the Bible, and was shown that Dispensational Eschatology was a false representation of God's plan for both the children of Israel and for Christians.It would be interesting to know your background.
It is a shame that some Christians are taught to be self-centered and believe all of scripture is only about Christians.As for the content above, you haven't read the NT. You haven't read Is 53, either.
I know almost no other theme in Romans than the arrival of the righteousness of God, and it is not what transforms a person; rather, it is imputed to them in spite of their works.
how do you explain mat 24:15?
The writers of Mark and Matthew did not convey the actual words of Jesus regarding the armies that were coming to surround Jerusalem, but concealed them in code phrases, as shown by the words, "let the reader understand."
The writer of Luke wrote the actual words of Jesus instead of the code phrases.
Raised in Baptist and Evangelical churches, indoctrinated in Dispensational Eschatology, then I found God, studied the Bible, and was shown that Dispensational Eschatology was a false representation of God's plan for both the children of Israel and for Christians.
It is a shame that some Christians are taught to be self-centered and believe all of scripture is only about Christians.
are you going to publish your version of the bible that conveys the actual words of Jesus?
Not everyone in NT churches read. This message was for a reader, who read it aloud to the others. Jesus was saying, here is the official interp of Dan 9's AofD. He will be in the temple in the midst of this cataclysm in this generation; get yourselves out of there, out of the country!
The actual words of Jesus are already in the Bible.are you going to publish your version of the bible that conveys the actual words of Jesus?
Matthew 24:15-16 15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand: ) 16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: |
Mark 13:14 14 But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains: |
Luke 21:20-21 20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. 21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto. |
The great tribulation is mentioned in the first part of the Olivet Discourse, and is the great exile of the children of Israel from the land of Israel. This great exile began with the destruction of the Temple, just like the Babylonian exile did, but lasts for much longer than the 70 years of the Babylonian exile. It is called the great tribulation because the length of time of the exile is so much greater than the time of the Babylonian exile.There are some prophecies in Daniel that have to do with intertestament events, but 8-9 is not one. That's because the 'rebellion that desolates' (later 'abomination that desolates') is part of the 490 period marked in 9. This is why 1st century priests refer to a rebellion that would ruin the entire country; both Josephus and Caiaphas did.
Mt24A is about 1st century Judea as anyone reading from ch 21 can tell. It is about immediate, first-hand, direct instructions about being around those events.
B starts in v29 but a delay was allowed.