Real Science Radio: Creation Evolution Headlines II with David Coppedge

[Jefferson]

Creation Evolution Headlines II with David Coppedge on RSR

This is the show from Friday, January 27th, 2017

SUMMARY:

* CREV Headlines on RSR: Bob Enyart welcomes back to Real Science Radio the former JPL employee David Coppedge to once again discuss amazing scientific discoveries. Coppedge is a former Cassini Saturn mission lead ground systems administrator for NASA and author of the Creation-Evolution Headlines site over at www.crev.info. One might think that by now, secular scientists would have figured out how the Moon go there, it being the closest of all celestial bodies. Yet, while they want people to believe that they can explain how the universe got here, the galaxies, the stars, and the planets, in reality, they can't even explain how the Moon got here. The guys also discuss how the latest discoveries about Pluto and Ceres once again fundamentally contradict the secular worldview. And the guys discuss yet another mammal that ate dinosaurs, biomimetics, and the grotesque inhumanity inspired by Darwinism.

EVENT -- ENYART: 9 a.m. this Saturday come out to hear Bob Enyart as the keynote speaker at Colorado RTL's 2017 March for Life across the street from Denver's Planned Parenthood.

EVENTS -- RIDDLE: 7 p.m. Thurs., Feb. 2nd hear creationist Mike Riddle in Arvada, Colorado at Peace Lutheran Church and again there from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on Sat., Feb. 4th attend Mike's "Beginning Creation Training" seminar!

* More Great CREV Interviews: Find our other great RSR programs with David at rsr.org/coppedge.

 

[Jonahdog]

More of Pastor Bob's "science does not know everything, therefore the Genesis deity"

 

[6days]

More of Pastor Bob's "science does not know everything, therefore the Genesis deity"

No... more like Darwinism and secular opinions fail as adequate explanations in comparison to God's Word.

 

[Jonahdog]

No... more like Darwinism and secular opinions fail as adequate explanations in comparison to God's Word.

Really? If your interpretation of the universe was really supported by the facts then there would be real evidence that the universe is but 6000 years old. But there is not, so either your deity left evidence just to confuse us or it simply did not happen the way you need it to happen.

 

[6days]

Really? If your interpretation of the universe was really supported by the facts then there would be real evidence that the universe is but 6000 years old. But there is not, so either your deity left evidence just to confuse us or it simply did not happen the way you need it to happen.

The evidence best fits the Biblical model of a created young universe. The OP mentions the moon as an example - The recession rate of the moon is a problem for believers in deep time; but not a problem for the Biblical model. We can also see evidence of a young universe in Pluto....in comets...in the low number of super novas...in magnetic field decay rates...tightly wound spinning galaxies....in population 3 stars....in 'mature' galaxies in the distant universe...etc. *


Since the evidence is consistent with God's Word, we dont need to invoke psuedoscientific ideas like evolutionists do such as multiverse. We don't need to create rescue device explanations such as faster than speed of light expansion, Oort cloud, dark energy etc.*


The evidence from the universe fits the eye witness testimony...God's Word.*

 

[Jonahdog]

The evidence best fits the Biblical model of a created young universe. The OP mentions the moon as an example - The recession rate of the moon is a problem for believers in deep time; but not a problem for the Biblical model. We can also see evidence of a young universe in Pluto....in comets...in the low number of super novas...in magnetic field decay rates...tightly wound spinning galaxies....in population 3 stars....in 'mature' galaxies in the distant universe...etc. *


Since the evidence is consistent with God's Word, we dont need to invoke psuedoscientific ideas like evolutionists do such as multiverse. We don't need to create rescue device explanations such as faster than speed of light expansion, Oort cloud, dark energy etc.*


The evidence from the universe fits the eye witness testimony...God's Word.*

Ah, no.

 

[Jonahdog]

Ah, no.But just for giggles, how old is Pluto? And how do you know?

 

[6days]

how old is Pluto

Pluto is just one of many evidences we live in a young universe less than 10,000 years. We know this from God's Word. Evidence supports scripture...we don't need rescue device / explanations.
For example...this article starts stating Pluto looks young. They ignore the most obvious answer; maybe it looks young, BECAUSE IT IS YOUNG.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/07/150715-pluto-flyby-photos-pictures-closeup-space/#close

 

[Jonahdog]

Pluto is just one of many evidences we live in a young universe less than 10,000 years. We know this from God's Word. Evidence supports scripture...we don't need rescue device / explanations.
For example...this article starts stating Pluto looks young. They ignore the most obvious answer; maybe it looks young, BECAUSE IT IS YOUNG.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/07/150715-pluto-flyby-photos-pictures-closeup-space/#close

Ah, other than your deity's "Word", how do you know Pluto is less than 10K years old? Please explain the evidence.

 

[6days]

Ah, other than your deity's "Word", how do you know Pluto is less than 10K years old? Please explain the evidence.

Already answered this Jonah, so I will just repeat..."...we live in a young universe less than 10,000 years. We know this from God's Word. Evidence supports scripture."

 

[Jonahdog]

6: you have no answer.