mighty_duck, isn't it funny how badly your argument has been debunked at this point and yet you try desperately to stick to it. You remind me of a man who made similar arguments to justify his using women and them "cleaning them out" to be used again. After all, it didn't matter that the argument holds no logical weight, it was better that you could cling to something to justify his mistreatment of women.
Of course a rape is a violation of a woman's body. A pregnancy is not. A rapist is guilty of a crime. A baby is not. A rapist can be killed in self defense so long as he is sufficiently guilty. A baby is guilty of nothing.
That you are at this age of your life and do not understand concepts like "guilt" and "innocence" exposes you as a fool.
