Does even one scientific organization think creationism is valid?

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Darwinists love arguments like this. The think that the number of people who believe something supports the truth of an idea.
 

Ben Masada

New member
Does even one scientific organization think creationism is valid?
I do and I don't care if the scientists do or not. No that every time one is created, was created by God; but because as a result of the beginning of creation. HaShem created the beginning and now all happens as a result of that creative act of His. Today we have the help of all parents with the creation process but the Lord created the beginning. For instance, let's take yourself as an evidence. If you did not create yourself which is logically impossible, it is only obvious that you must have been created by someone else that preceded you. Your parents, their parents and so back all the way into the past till the very beginning. That's how I know that Creationism is valid. Why don't you?
 

SonOfCaleb

Active member

genuineoriginal

New member
Does even one scientific organization think creationism is valid?
There is a reason scientific organizations think creationism is invalid.
_____
Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternative possibilities. It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs.​
 

Jose Fly

New member
Does even one scientific organization think creationism is valid?

Well, everyone here knows the answer is "no". The amusing part is in watching creationists trying to explain why that is so. :chuckle:
 

genuineoriginal

New member
Well, everyone here knows the answer is "no". The amusing part is in watching creationists trying to explain why that is so. :chuckle:
Many people know why it is so.
_____
Brainwashed is the explosive exposé of the leftist agenda at work in today's colleges, revealed by firebrand Ben Shapiro, a recent UCLA gratudate, syndicated columnist, and one of today's most exciting new conservative voices, who's been on the front lines of the battle for America's young minds. This book proves once and for all that so-called higher education continues to sink lower and lower into the depths of liberal madness as close-minded professors turn their students into socialists, atheists, race-baiters, and sex-crazed narcissists​
 

Jose Fly

New member
Many people know why it is so.
_____
Brainwashed is the explosive exposé of the leftist agenda at work in today's colleges, revealed by firebrand Ben Shapiro, a recent UCLA gratudate, syndicated columnist, and one of today's most exciting new conservative voices, who's been on the front lines of the battle for America's young minds. This book proves once and for all that so-called higher education continues to sink lower and lower into the depths of liberal madness as close-minded professors turn their students into socialists, atheists, race-baiters, and sex-crazed narcissists​

Like I said....highly amusing. :chuckle:
 

6days

New member
Jose Fly said:
Well, everyone here knows the answer is "no". {Does even one scientific organization think creationism is valid}
Evolutionists know lots of facts.... which aren't true. The Korean Association of Creation Research has over 500 PhD scientists who are members. They think Biblical creation is the best explanation of the evidence.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Can anyone name a scientific organization that endorses Darwinism?
 

Jose Fly

New member
The Korean Association of Creation Research has over 500 PhD scientists who are members. They think Biblical creation is the best explanation of the evidence.

Why is it when I point out the widespread and near universal support of evolutionary theory among the world's scientific organizations, you cry "appeal to popularity", but when you say the above it's just fine?
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Why is it when I point out the widespread and near universal support of evolutionary theory among the world's scientific organizations, you cry "appeal to popularity", but when you say the above it's just fine?

Because you use popularity as if it is evidence, whereas 6 was asked to provide a creationist organization.

Simple, huh?
 

6days

New member
Because you use popularity as if it is evidence, whereas 6 was asked to provide a creationist organization.

Simple, huh?
:)
Ha..... funny, isn't it?
They ask a question, but develop amnesia when the question is answered. They suddenly think the goalposts are somewhere different.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
:)
Ha..... funny, isn't it?
They ask a question, but develop amnesia when the question is answered. They suddenly think the goalposts are somewhere different.

One of these days we'll get a rational discussion out of one of them.
 

genuineoriginal

New member
One of these days we'll get a rational discussion out of one of them.

That is doubtful.
Evolutionists believe being able to rationalize (of, relating to, or constituting reasoning powers) is the same as being rational (having or exercising reason, sound judgment, or good sense).

Believing in Evolution is only made possible by throwing away sound judgment and good sense.
 

Jose Fly

New member
As I previously described my conversation with other biologists...

See, we all know how things are in the world of science. Every single accredited university that has a science program teaches evolution and that the universe is billions of years old. Every single biotech firm operates under the paradigm of evolutionary theory. Every single scientific organization that has voiced their opinion on the issue has unequivocally stated that evolution is reality. Every single biological journal publishes multiple papers per year expanding our understanding of how evolution works, how it proceeded in the past, and uses that information to add to our scientific knowledge. And when you get into "billions of years" it's just as clear. IOW, in the earth and life sciences, evolution and "billions of years" are an essential part of the entire framework and have been for a very long time.

At the same time, not one accredited university, scientific organization, biotech firm, scientific journal, or other productive scientific endeavor incorporates or utilizes creationism or the idea that everything is less than 10,000 years old in any way, shape or form. Creationism hasn't accomplished or even contributed to anything science in well over a century. From a scientific standpoint, creationism is 100% irrelevant and has been for a very long time.

So the state of the issue from a scientific perspective couldn't be any more clear, right? There is no debate, there is no controversy, there really isn't even anything to discuss.

Yet if you come into forums like the one I showed you, you encounter all sorts of Christians who will tell you...apparently with a straight face and in all seriousness (if you could see them)...that the exact opposite is true. Evolution is failed and/or disproven, and has not only failed to contribute anything to science in any way at all, it has actually "hindered science". Creationism is the superior explanation, has produced all sorts of wonderful contributions to modern science, and is without any doubt perfectly in line with all the evidence.​
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
That is doubtful.
Evolutionists believe being able to rationalize (of, relating to, or constituting reasoning powers) is the same as being rational (having or exercising reason, sound judgment, or good sense).

Believing in Evolution is only made possible by throwing away sound judgment and good sense.
You might be right.

They are utterly enamored with how popular their religion is.
 
Top