Search results

There's already a thread on 'Captain Pillow'... https://theologyonline.com/threads/mike-lindells-absolute-proof.55435/post-1784432

It was deemed constitutional. If you want to throw hissy fits about it then eh, crack on with it if you must but it's not going to change anything...

They're based on common sense. Any civilized society needs laws that outlaw extremes such as murder and the like. What countries are you referring to and in what way? There's plenty of places where there are grievous laws in place and where human rights are practically non existent. Good thing...

Uh, you asked for proof that the Trump impeachment trial is constitutional. You were provided with it. Get a grip.

No, unfortunately I've seen all too much far right wingnuttery to be ignorant of it...Sure don't want to check out more of the same so if this is all you had as 'proof' then blah blah blah is all you actually had to bring to the table.

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/trump-impeachment-trial-senate-constitutional-day-1/

Good grief...

It was deemed constitutional and rightly so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_American Pass.

Pfft, I'm not interested in plenty of the tabloid press over here so if that's the extent of your "proof", then yeah, pass. Find a credible source, one that can be corroborated.

How are they not defending the product when they're issuing lawsuits against nuts like Powell? Why are 'news' outlets at pains to distance themselves away from any such claims? If you've got proof to bring to the table as to how Dominion & Smartmatic machines are insecure and there was fraud...

Random mud it is then...

Of course I do. How would you feel if you owned a company and some nut started spreading baseless lies about your business being fraudulent? You telling me that you wouldn't do something about it?

That's kinda ironic considering that some of the Trump supporters accuse the "left" of inflating the election results...

In what way am I lying? If you don't respond then that's your prerogative of course but flinging about the term 'liar' doesn't amount to anything in itself. It is fact that there is plenty of evidence to support the efficacy of wearing masks whether you like it or not. It's why I wear them...

According to who? She wants to worry more about her own reputation, whatever there is left of it along with her bank balance...

Well, firstly, they're sensible laws that we have whatever. Any civilized society has laws in place to protect the populace. Secondly, that was one example of a law that I disagree with. Someone deemed old enough to fight in a war is old enough to have a drink AFAIC. Thirdly, already have...

The latter methinks...

She hasn't 'damaged their reputation' at all. She's on the receiving end of a lawsuit in excess of a billion dollars because of her nonsense claims. Far right news outlets have stressed that they acknowledge that there's no evidence to support such in order to avoid the same.

Says it all...