Search results

Oh, for sure they do, as evidenced by many reports on the news and some of the fixation even on here.

Um, no, I'm referring to the 'far right' as they actually happen to be. That "amended" graph is just flat out ridiculous.

Unfortunately there's still those who buy into it, and absolutely.

I understand fine well what vulnerable means. There are people who are at higher risk from this virus - the elderly, people with underlying health conditions - but that doesn't mean that younger people who have been considered to be in good health haven't succumbed to it. Don't need to read up...

Yes, I saw it and I posted a video of that on an adjoining thread. "Way 2 Go's" I think. My mistake, it was jefferson's on the 'coronavirus scam'

How dare you insult me like that?! Oh, in context, you actually weren't. Well, let's see if RD has a substantial reply to bring to the table if he bothers to do so.

I join you in such shame...

And now for Canada's take! :D

In the case of a pandemic, most people are vulnerable to the disease. In what way would you 'destroy' not more than the disease? By what measures and how? What protocols would you advocate to reduce the spread of infection? What restrictions, if any, would you enforce? What advice would you seek...

And as such have enacted the following: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/03/us/politics/capitol-riot-qanon-trump.html Probably a prudent move but it just goes to show the sad state of affairs with the American far right.

I reiterate. Crowder can't have much to do these days...

Oh, get a new trope will ya?

Hmm, Crowder can't have much to do these days...

Interesting. That isn't what Trump was suggesting in that bonkers briefing was it? No need to search it out. Right up there on this page in video format no less. Funny how he tried to claim sarcasm the following day after the furore that subsequently happened. Well, it wasn't really...

There was nothing dishonest about it. The floor is yours. If you had the power to implement procedures during a pandemic such as this then what measures would you take?

Sure there is, not only were you indulging and continuing to indulge in personal jibes, you'd made an erroneous presumption that I equated lockdowns with safety protocols. Much like the time where you bizarrely claimed that I believed that scientific theories are based on consensus. So by your...

Sure there is, by your own standards no less. You're the one who had a go at me over a response to Hilltrot that ironically, wasn't even an insult. You're the one who stated that it's childish to do so when engaging with someone of an opposing view and twice now, you've indulged in name calling...

Of course I can tell the difference and I see you're reduced to childishly and hypocritically insulting those with an opposing view. Ho hum.

As the article states at the end, Gov De Santis might have wanted to find another punching bag before mouthing off. I realize there's nothing that would convince you of the effectiveness of lockdowns but hey, that's okay. You'd have probably kept everything open if you'd be in charge, right? All...