Search results

I was unfamiliar with the acronym but wow, what a bag of rancid rubbish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way Eh, let em' go their own way...a long way away...

It is? Darn...

Saw it the first time unfortunately. A quick word of advice: Acquaint yourself with critical thinking skills. You'll see through the likes of TGP, infowars & similar ilk in a heartbeat. You'll also see through the facile and childish defending of such in similar time.

Ya got me there. I'm still in remedial school...

Hey dude. You buy into their stuff if ya like. Maybe all of their reports are true and maybe the same goes for 'Q' and Infowars. Wow, wouldn't that be something?

Sure I did. And, then, some. no less.

Hardly just Wikipedia but hey, you buy into stuff like TGP all ya want if you're that gullible. Uh huh. Those promoting wholesale bunk won't be able to back it up as with TGP - Infowars etc. You are such a pompous pillock to return the kindergarten stuff as that's where you seem to want to...

Hmm. TGP's a joke, much like you, and, grammar. Kind regards anyhoo...

You were answered about it. You gonna parrot on about how you supposedly weren't? Have fun...

Some of this MAGA lot prob still think it's his natural skin tone...

Oh dear, are you a TGP reader?

Of course it's supported. Not that anyone grounded in reality should need a link after seeing their joke of a website but here ya go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit May as tell me that the onus is on me to disprove any given claim by anyone out in la-la land. Hey, my next...

"Parrot"? Uh, yeah, sure. I use the term like it's going out of proverbial fashion...

I'll give ya this much. At least you haven't tortured the English language as you're normally prone to do. Also - good one!

It's a pretty common term actually, one in which a quick google search would aid you with. It mostly (unsurprisingly) relates to North America.

The Gateway Pundit is well established for posting unsubstantiated nonsense. I'm not in the habit of giving credence to discredited rags that promote complete bunk. If you're one of those who buy into any given site sans verifiable corroboration then you can take your oh so predictable third...

Well, it's funny that you bring this up Jefferson because in fact, you didn't.

The onus isn't on me to disprove a claim made from a discredited rag that plies its stock in trade with conspiracy rubbish. It's on those who are dumb enough to buy into it to corroborate it. Care to give it a whirl?

The Gateway Pundit doesn't "report" on anything. It prints a whole load of unsustainable bunk to a select audience that are too gullible/brainwashed/thick to question the veracity of anything it claims - namely the North American far right...

Any non wingnut/bat crazy/loop the loop and round again evidence to support this claim of yours?